posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 11:50 PM
Originally posted by MRuss
reply to post by MaMaa
Obama's negative campaigning had a lot to do with it.
Rather than having a platform, Obama successfully attacked the better candidate. Rather than having answers, Obama spent most of his time making
Romney look bad.
By all accounts, Romeny is actually a good man.
A lot of people changed their minds about him once they turned off the MSM and got to know him.
I didn't like Romney and I promise you it had nothing to do with mainstream media or the Obama campaigning. Heck Romney did his own share of
negative campaigning but I can't tell who is the pot and who is the kettle between Obama and Romney. I don't think either candidate needed help
looking bad, they do it all on their own accord. LOL I don't believe that Romney would have been the better candidate. I didn't vote for Obama,
but part of me thinks that it is better to go with the devil you know than the one you don't. I don't trust Romney, there for I could not vote for
him. I ended up voting Libertarian.. in hopes of giving him the 5% he needs for the next presidential go round.
I am not in Ohio,but Colorado and I could not in good conscience vote for Romney, even though I'm a registered republican. Romney totally reminded
me of a sleazy used car salesmen, I didn't trust one word he said.