As Mitt Romney becomes irrelevant, Ron Paul tinkers with invitations to speak on the global stage

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


I don't understand how you can compare Reagan to Bush, but that's a small point.

If they keep selecting such candidates might as well cut the two party system.

Let's say pigs fly and you are right. What happens then? Say the US becomes entirely controlled by the Democrat party, does another party rise up? What would it be like?

If another party doesn't rise up and we stay Democrat, will we end up like California? Will we become broke, disarmed and destroyed? And do you think that would be a good thing?

reply to post by charles1952


The only party that can rise up is the Libertarian party. As those are the only ideals that can save the country and honestly a libertarian is what we need.

Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter

 

I don't understand how you can compare Reagan to Bush, but that's a small point.

If they keep selecting such candidates might as well cut the two party system.

Let's say pigs fly and you are right. What happens then? Say the US becomes entirely controlled by the Democrat party, does another party rise up? What would it be like?

If another party doesn't rise up and we stay Democrat, will we end up like California? Will we become broke, disarmed and destroyed? And do you think that would be a good thing?

The Ron Paul Republicans are too overwhelming, now mainstream NEOCON Republican pundits are forced to admit it.

Infamous NEOCON, Bill Kristol, as much as it pains him, just admitted Rand Paul will be a top tier presidential candidate in 2016 because of the libertarian/Ron Paul wing of the party.

Originally posted by eLPresidente
[Infamous NEOCON, Bill Kristol, as much as it pains him, just admitted Rand Paul will be a top tier presidential candidate in 2016 because of the libertarian/Ron Paul wing of the party.

He also said yeah let's tax the rich a bit more - it won't hurt......