November 2012 Interview of George Kavassilas, page 1

Originally posted by Mary Rose

Originally posted by LittleByLittle
The question is are they symbiotic in nature or parasitic.

He talks about an entity or species - I'm not sure what word to use - that is using the chakra system for purposes not in our best interest.

Typo

In answer to your query, one has to go very far back, and very deep to understand what is being said. In simple form, "unity" of self does not require 7 different "emotional" areas in order to exist, as unity is unity by definition. what is being said about the chakra is that way, way back, when the human body system was hijacked, these were installed, as well as the "split" in the brain. The brain split was done to keep unity from happening, the Charkra's do the same thing. The are really a kind of implant that allows a collection of information, then, a place for feedback of information - an area for information to be broadcast to. Think of it like a computer program, you have your main programs, but you've installed some viral programs to monitor things, they don't really work with the other programs, but monitor the various part of the system and you can tell them to do various tasks without really informing the other programs.

When the religions were created, and they were, one sect latched on to the use of them. Back then we were more adept at seeing them, so the chakra system religion was created to "honor" them instead of breaking them down. Over time, each successive generation of devotees altered the doctrine to reflect the changes and the followers just feel in line, never questioning as they don't now. So now, the new age who honor the chakara lineage just go with what they read, then apply, never venturing deeper into the system. If you actually go into them, past all the programming, all the history, all the thoughts etc. you'll see they are not only not needed as a spiritual tool, but don't really serve one at all.

Unity is unity, it isn't broken up parts. The idea George is expressing, is simply to drop ALL the dogma, ALL of it, as there is no reason to pick it apart all the religions and find what is "true" or "liked" and what is not - this act is a religion too. The origins of most of this crap are suspect at best, so simply toss out the baby, the bathwater and the bath and see what is left, what is you.

Most people cannot do this, and won't. The idea of shedding all the programs in favor of what they might think without them brings up the programming that says you'll die without the programming. Deny your chakra system complex and see what happens - not likely you'll die.

As for the entities he is referring to. If you have not interacted with them, there can be no real conversation as there is no frame of reference. Think of it this way, can you have a deep conversation about the Papua New Guinna Tribes and their eating habits without having lived with them? No. The same goes for the offworlders, the problem is for some reason people think the know all about the offworlders even though they don't know them. If you want to understand whether they are helpful or not, consider this. Your neighbor, who has an IQ of 45, nice, but 45, wants to help you by doing your taxes. He insists, nice guy, IQ of 45, demands you let him do your taxes. You btw, are a tax accountant. Why do you need help from him? Why does he insist? What do you get out of it? Now, remember, he just really wants your attention, he does not really care about your taxes as he really doesn't know what they are. They offer help, help that serves their agenda, help that seems really wonderful, I've met some that offer help with money, fame, health, you name it, and they provide - what happens in exchange is beyond unhelpful - think your favorite melted-down starlet.