This topic is in the Military & Government Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


Foundations are in place for Martial Law in the USA




Topic started on 1-8-2002 @ 02:41 AM by Varde


By Ritt Goldstein
July 27 2002

Recent pronouncements from the Bush Administration and national security initiatives put in place in the Reagan era could see internment camps and martial law in the United States.

When president Ronald Reagan was considering invading Nicaragua he issued a series of executive orders that provided the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) with broad powers in the event of a "crisis" such as "violent and widespread internal dissent or national opposition against a US military invasion abroad". They were never used.

But with the looming possibility of a US invasion of Iraq, recent pronouncements by President George Bush's domestic security chief, Tom Ridge, and an official with the US Civil Rights Commission should fire concerns that these powers could be employed or a de facto drift into their deployment could occur.

On July 20 the Detroit Free Press ran a story entitled "Arabs in US could be held, official warns". The story referred to a member of the US Civil Rights Commission who foresaw the possibility of internment camps for Arab Americans. FEMA has practised for such an occasion.

FEMA, whose main role is disaster response, is also responsible for handling US domestic unrest.

From 1982-84 Colonel Oliver North assisted FEMA in drafting its civil defence preparations. Details of these plans emerged during the 1987 Iran-Contra scandal.

They included executive orders providing for suspension of the constitution, the imposition of martial law, internment camps, and the turning over of government to the president and FEMA.

A Miami Herald article on July 5, 1987, reported that the former FEMA director Louis Guiffrida's deputy, John Brinkerhoff, handled the martial law portion of the planning. The plan was said to be similar to one Mr Giuffrida had developed earlier to combat "a national uprising by black militants". It provided for the detention "of at least 21million American Negroes"' in "assembly centres or relocation camps".

Today Mr Brinkerhoff is with the highly influential Anser Institute for Homeland Security. Following a request by the Pentagon in January that the US military be allowed the option of deploying troops on American streets, the institute in February published a paper by Mr Brinkerhoff arguing the legality of this.

He alleged that the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which has long been accepted as prohibiting such deployments, had simply been misunderstood and misapplied.

The preface to the article also provided the revelation that the national plan he had worked on, under Mr Giuffrida, was "approved by Reagan, and actions were taken to implement it".

By April, the US military had created a Northern Command to aid Homeland defence. Reuters reported that the command is "mainly expected to play a supporting role to local authorities".

However, Mr Ridge, the Director of Homeland Security, has just advocated a review of US law regarding the use of the military for law enforcement duties.

Disturbingly, the full facts and final contents of Mr Reagan's national plan remain uncertain. This is in part because President Bush took the unusual step of sealing the Reagan presidential papers last November. However, many of the key figures of the Reagan era are part of the present administration, including John Poindexter, to whom Oliver North later reported.

At the time of the Reagan initiatives, the then attorney-general, William French Smith, wrote to the national security adviser, Robert McFarlane: "I believe that the role assigned to the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the revised Executive Order exceeds its proper function as a co-ordinating agency for emergency preparedness ... this department and others have repeatedly raised serious policy and legal objections to an 'emergency czar' role for FEMA."

Criticism of the Bush Administration's response to September11 echoes Mr Smith's warning. On June 7 the former presidential counsel John Dean spoke of America's sliding into a "constitutional dictatorship" and martial law.

Ritt Goldstein is an investigative journalist and a former leader in the movement for US law enforcement accountability. He revealed exclusively in the Herald last week the Bush Administration's plans for a domestic spying system more pervasive than the Stasi network in East Germany.

www.smh.com.au...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-8-2002 @ 06:28 PM by f16falcon


is the USA imposes martial law canada will probably cause were too stupid to be indepent so we just follow the usa



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-8-2002 @ 08:16 PM by jra


i highly doubt that Canada would follow. there would be no reason to do so. from what i see Canada doesn't "follow" the USA much at all.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-8-2002 @ 09:06 PM by psypher


actually the one that seems to be doing all the following is the UK. They'd probably do it too cuz of their foreign policy that states "we must be USA's biatch"!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-9-2002 @ 10:17 AM by TÍx’s RÍþÍ£


I sirously dought that marshall law will take effects on US soils this is why AMEICANS own the rights to bear arms in the United States "Incase our goverment ever trys to turn against us. we have the right to stand up for ourselves. For we the peopel are the goverment.
TÍx’s RÍþÍ£ out



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-9-2002 @ 12:36 PM by ultra_phoenix


TÍx’s RÍþÍ£, you right, but you're a little bit to much optimist.
If a majority is agree with the gov, the minority who will not be agree will be in deep troubles. Constitution or not.

A paper never stopped any gov'. Even if this paper is the Constitution.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-9-2002 @ 02:45 PM by Forevers End


hehe , true that ultra , i donno , though i do doubt this marshall law coming , sure its good to prepare , but just live you life !



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-9-2002 @ 02:36 AM by ultra_phoenix


Well, that's what I do. I live my life.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-9-2002 @ 09:48 PM by Ezekiel


I totally agree. I know that over here in Australia there is going to be a huuge stink kicked up if the attack on Iraq goes ahead, and Im presuming the same will happen in USA.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2002 @ 09:52 PM by derMorder


----------------------------------------------------"I totally agree. I know that over here in Australia there is going to be a huuge stink kicked up if the attack on Iraq goes ahead, and Im presuming the same will happen in USA. " ------------------------------


Why is there going to be a stinkup. It is every Australians patriotic duty to support our government in its fight against the chemical warfare stashing Iraqi's. If you simply "live your life" , you are never thinking about the big picture, in which millions are dying of disease, starvation and hunger all due to one mans stupidity.

Get your head out of the sand and your finger out of your ass, maybe youll realise there are things in this world worhth protecting.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-9-2002 @ 05:13 PM by MountainStar


Texas say's



I sirously dought that marshall law will take effects on US soils this is why AMEICANS own the rights to bear arms in the United States "Incase our goverment ever trys to turn against us. we have the right to stand up for ourselves. For we the peopel are the goverment.



If Marshall Law goes into effect you will loose your rights 'To bear Arms'! It would probably come to either turn in your guns or die trying to keep them.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , , , ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.411 seconds
Page processed in 0.387 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread