Romney, as viewed from over here.

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 08:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


I am not looking at plans....anyone can say anything, I am looking at their past acts.

Obama never held a real job, never created any jobs anywhere.

I support keeping Iran from creating nuclear weapons, they already stated why they want them, their past actions prove they are not to be trusted.
edit on 5-11-2012 by timetothink because: (no reason given)


they already stated why they want them.

No they didn't they stated they want the nuclear power for civilian uses.




I support keeping Iran I support keeping Iran from creating nuclear weapons,.


Oh you mean just like how we kept Iraq I support keeping Iran from creating nuclear weapons and acually invaded them over it?




I am not looking at plans....anyone can say anything


So according to you Romney has no plans to create Jobs.




posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 08:10 PM
link   
Have many of you stopped and thought that perhaps Obama "wanted" to do these things in the past 4 years, but couldn't because of the "machine" in the back room.

I fear the "Machine" in the back room is more supportive of Romney's sabre rattling.


We don't need more war. I'm sick of it



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 08:15 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptainBeno
 


That`s a great excuse. You can use that one for every politician.



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 08:27 PM
link   
reply to post by hououinkyouma
 


Trouble is my friend, You and I both know it's true.



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 09:11 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptainBeno
 



Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Trouble is my friend, You and I both know it's true.


That's hogwash...largely because they aren't victims, they're participants.


You imagine Obama and others being forced against their will. I judge the actions. In that manner, if necessary, we get to exchange one bozo...every four years....for another bozo.


Under your approach, which requires faith, you would have your bozo perfect his game and increase his opportunity to screw us even harder in a second term.

No thanks.
edit on 5-11-2012 by loam because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 11:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by flexy123

Originally posted by timetothink
I support keeping Iran from creating nuclear weapons, they already stated why they want them, their past actions prove they are not to be trusted.
edit on 5-11-2012 by timetothink because: (no reason given)


Do you think that dems or even ultra left liberals "support" Iran to mass up nuclear weapons?
So what is Romney's "solution"? Send a few bombs in advance? Or threat Iran by raising fists toward the middle-east? What if it escalates into a WW III?

Too bad, you can't solve this with threats, there must be REAL solutions de-escalating this. Problem only, Romney is not exactly known for solutions. He is more likely to escalate this into a serious situation, where DIPLOMACY and smart acting is more required than anything.

Do you think Obama "likes" Iran amassing nuclear technology???


Romney is perfectly capable of compromise. He proved that well enough when he was governor. Though I suppose it does all depend on whether or not he chooses to try to compromise with Iran or if he does do as you said, and raises his fists to the middle east.

However, you can't really blame America entirely for this one. We've tried to work things out with the middle east countless times but they can't seem get over their anti-Americanism long enough to even hear us out. Then they get all angry and riled up when we are forced to take military action just to get their attention. To solve this conflict we will need diplomacy on BOTH sides.
edit on 6-11-2012 by PassingOfNights because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 11:42 AM
link   
reply to post by solidguy
 


I agree, let's see how he solves the Iran problem from there....

edit on 6-11-2012 by timetothink because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 11:45 AM
link   
reply to post by Trustfund
 


Not impressed....he has no knowledge of economics..."visiting professor" lol in other words a professional talker, he talks and talks and talks.

And working for the Anneberg whatever....o you know who's behind that?

I stand by what I said.



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 11:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


I never said he didn't have any plans, I said I look at actions....don't put words in my mouth to suit your agenda.

Which by the way, seems to be to convince us that a government like your country has is right for us..... no way would I want a to be in some socialist wimpy country.



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by CaptainBeno
 


Funny that Machine didn't stop him from signing all the executive orders he did including the NDAA...fail on that theory.



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 12:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Trustfund
 


Funny how the left hates the rich unless they are on their side:


I didn't feel the Depression at all. I always had a pocketful of money. Walter Annenberg Read more at www.brainyquote.com...




Live rich, die poor; never make the mistake of doing it the other way round. Walter Annenberg Read more at www.brainyquote.com...



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 12:33 PM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 


Now that one is just plain stupid. 'The Machine' would WANT the NDAA enacted. Duh!



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 12:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by hououinkyouma
reply to post by CaptainBeno
 


That`s a great excuse. You can use that one for every politician.


We can use it for every politician whose gone up against the Tea Party
and Senate and House Republicans whose intent was openly stated as ruining Obama's
chances for re-election. Ruining our credit, saying no to every jobs bill and no
to bills that were originally Republican bills if it hurt Obama.
So what's that bring us down to?
One politician.



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 12:59 PM
link   
I rather have a guy that knows how to run a company and balance a budget then a community organizer.

How did a community organizer get elected in the first place???



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 01:17 PM
link   
I think America politics has run full circle. When the government was first constructed, it was built so not to have a monarchy or despotic rule. However today, with all the finger pointing and fear-mongering, I can only see two despotic groups vying for control. According to Republican, the Democrats are going to their best to destroy America and according to Democrats the Republicans are out to do the same thing.

Now a two party system is good to keep control out of the hands of a single power, but when those parties become more interested in fighting against each other while foregoing the betterment of the people they serve, what good are they? There is nothing wrong with having a differing opinion but to hold onto your own view and refusing to even listen to another view point makes you nothing more than a petulant child throwing a tantrum. Unfortunately this is how I see 90% of our elected officials.



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 01:32 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptainBeno
 


Romney is not Bush. How anyone could vote for 4 more years of the same crap we just had just boggles the mind. If America votes Obama in again, we can look forward to 4 years of absolutely not accomplishing anything. The Republicans need to take the White House, House and Senate. If they can't fix things in four years we need to throw them all out and try something else.



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by camaro68ss
 


Well you had Bush Jr., he was a business man (oil tycoon).

Look how well that ended for us all.


It's s-for-brains thinking to just "assume" that a business man is the best for the country...unless you, yourself are a business man.





top topics
 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join