It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hotel1
You may be on too something significant with this. I raised this point in a thread of my own recently, and it brought about some discussion. Your example of the Thatcher 91 election is a pertinent one for the US 2012 S&F I will be watching to see how this thread develops.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
My own reasoning?
Obama got 99% of the black vote before, he will get that again, but only 50% of that 99% will be voting. Also, the novelty, the newness of having a black president has worn off. I actually don't believe people (as a whole) are that racist, maybe biased, but not racist. So the caucasian vote will swing back to issues and not a "newness" issue. And Romney wins on the issues.
The reason why the polls are so tied? People just aren't being honest.
Originally posted by works4dhs
this happened years ago in Virginia. Limbaugh called it 'the Wilder effect' after then-gov Douglas Wilder. people being polled apparently were reluctant to admit they were voting against him.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by beezzer
Interesting that you mention it.
November 1 I posted this.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
My own reasoning?
Obama got 99% of the black vote before, he will get that again, but only 50% of that 99% will be voting. Also, the novelty, the newness of having a black president has worn off. I actually don't believe people (as a whole) are that racist, maybe biased, but not racist. So the caucasian vote will swing back to issues and not a "newness" issue. And Romney wins on the issues.
The reason why the polls are so tied? People just aren't being honest.
Originally posted by Taiyed
Originally posted by beezzer
Interesting that you mention it.
November 1 I posted this.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
My own reasoning?
Obama got 99% of the black vote before, he will get that again, but only 50% of that 99% will be voting. Also, the novelty, the newness of having a black president has worn off. I actually don't believe people (as a whole) are that racist, maybe biased, but not racist. So the caucasian vote will swing back to issues and not a "newness" issue. And Romney wins on the issues.
The reason why the polls are so tied? People just aren't being honest.
Obama got 95% of the black vote in 2008, not 99%.
And there is no indication that the black vote is going to be lighter this year than last year, just baseless assumptions.
A new CNN poll that samples 11 percent more Democrats than Republicans yet has Romney and Obama tied at 49 percent has instilled confidence in Team Romney.
The poll seems to suggest CNN may have oversampled too many Democrats since the same poll shows Romney defeating Obama with Independents 59 percent to 35 percent.
To many observers, it is curious how CNN figures Mr. Obama is attracting so many Democrats to the polls in 2012 that they must over-sample them in the final poll by 11 points.
The CNN poll surveyed 41 percent Democrats to 30 percent Republican to come up with a tie race, which is a wider gap than has existed recent elections, including 2008, according to The Washington Examiner.