Ohio Union Workers Caught With Truckload of Stolen Romney Signs, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 5-11-2012 @ 02:54 PM by MystikMushroom
reply to post by beezzer



Research is pointing that social liberals tend to have higher IQ's. It's a very debateable topic, and I'm surprised you would even go there. But here's some information:


Despite their important implications for interpersonal behaviors and relations, cognitive abilities have been largely ignored as explanations of prejudice. We proposed and tested mediation models in which lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice, an effect mediated through the endorsement of right-wing ideologies (social conservatism, right-wing authoritarianism) and low levels of contact with out-groups


Here's the abstract for the study:
Bright minds and dark attitudes: lower cognitive ability predicts great prejudice through right-wing ideology and lower intergroup contact

Here's an article on that same study in Discover:
Social conservatives have a lower I.Q.? (probably)



Beezzer, won't you be glad after tomorrow so we can go back to talking about aliens and UFO's?
edit on 5-11-2012 by MystikMushroom because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-11-2012 @ 07:16 PM by GrimReaper86
reply to post by FlyersFan



Well I was going to vote for Romney, but then my neighbors sign supporting Romney up and vanished so now I'm voting for Obama.

Seriously though, your right, whose going to change their vote based on signs in peoples yards? Are their people out there that dumb that will actually change how they think based on something so simple as a sign in a yard?

As for me I'm probably not voting for either one of the two shiny turds.
edit on 5-11-2012 by GrimReaper86 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-11-2012 @ 07:36 PM by fnpmitchreturns
reply to post by xuenchen



I know... they were GOP plants stealing them there signs ... HA HA HA

Partisan people are such fools ..... funny I have seen you in two other thread claim them GPers who were caught were Dem plants .... HA HA HA

the blind leading the blind and the blind voting of pathetic sheeple!

a vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil! ...... but in this case both R & D parties represent the same evil!


reply posted on 5-11-2012 @ 07:47 PM by Swills
reply to post by FlyersFan



Eh, who cares? Like you said, it's not like taking the signs down a couple of days before election is gonna make anyone change their mind about voting for Obama or somehow not knowing that Romney exists. The fact these men have done this for that very reason makes them idiots. I wonder if they're gonna get in any trouble for using a company vehicle and making the news?




reply posted on 6-11-2012 @ 05:00 PM by LadyGreenEyes
reply to post by FlyersFan



What they think, based on the comments in Twitter, from various talking heads, from a sitting president telling people to vote for "revenge", etc, is that they can intimidate people into either voting for their guy, or not voting. Violence has been threatened against Romney supporters when Romney wins. This is yet another attempt at intimidation, coupled with trying to make people think that those whose signs were stolen might have changed their minds.


reply posted on 6-11-2012 @ 05:12 PM by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by ldyserenity
Quite honestly, I couldn't care any less for those signs. Personally if I owned a community it woulld be deed restricted and have an HOA Just for the sole purpose of keeping those ugly signs from being out on their front lawns. I think it's so white trash. You like your candidate, good go out and vote do not make my beautiful world a trailer park with campaign signs. The only signs they could put up is for sale signs, advertisement for their contractors that did their work (But only for a limited time), and those tiny signs that tell you their house has ADT security system or whatever security system. I think the only thing trashier than campaign signs are plastic lawn ornament Pink Flamingoes. I actually wish that St Petersburg would put a law in that says nobody can do it. I think that if they can raise hell about a woman putting a cross on her lawn and signs about bible study on her front lawn than they need to get on the ball and stop these white trash political trolling signs. That's my .02.
edit on 5-11-2012 by ldyserenity because: clarity and spelling


Well, that is your opinion, and you are, of course, entitled to it. That said, does "freedom of speech" mean anything to you? Personally, I plan to NEVER live anyplace with a HOA. Those organizations are nothing but fascist. Telling people what they can do on THEIR property, what color they can paint their house, that they can't have a satellite dish, etc, etc, ad nauseum. My sister lives in such a place, and can't get satellite TV because the place the dish needs to go, the HOA forbids them. You know, on the ROOF. Political signs are an exercise of free speech, and NO ONE should be able to restrict them. Not those, not a cross, or whatever. City coding laws tend to take care of real issues, that involve sanitation or safety. HOAs don't add anything useful, and are very controlling. Plus...."white trash"?? Interesting choice of words....care to elaborate?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags