Who took this picture?... MARS

Cookie for the correct answer.

Also, check out the lens on the Rovers head.. IS that someone's outline?

Looks like Seti took a dump and is about to step in his own fecal matter.




Gross............

Marvin?




They claim they did it with the robot arm, but how did they get it out of the photos? Stitched, photoshopped, it would be good to see the originals...

Here is your answer.

Sorry no green people on Mars did this.

Originally posted by gorgi
Here is your answer.

Sorry no green people on Mars did this.

What?

Differnt picture.

A whistleblower? For the last holdouts who actually believe this was taken on Mars and not the Atacama Desert of Chile or Hawaii or Arizona or other likely locales for staging.

Originally posted by gorgi
Here is your answer.

Sorry no green people on Mars did this.

I think the OP is implying that the photo of the Rover was taken here on Earth and the pic was taken by a man who appears in the lens. Correct me if I'm wrong OP.

If the shadow in the lens is the person who took the picture, then why is the shadow shaped like that? Wouldn't there be an arm up in the shadow? That shadow is typical of someone standing with arms down...how do you take a photo like that? It is not typical of a shadow of someone who is taking a photo. The shadow in the lens is not a person taking a photo.

reply to post by CALGARIAN


thats funny i just seen a video about that on youtube 5min ago.

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Originally posted by gorgi
Here is your answer.

Sorry no green people on Mars did this.

What?

Differnt picture.

How bout this one:

www.wired.com...

The image was taken by Curiosity’s MAHLI hand-held camera, which sits on the end of the rover’s extendable arm. MAHLI snapped 55 pictures from different locations. The different positions overlapped just enough so that the arm couldn’t be seen in the final result.

did anybody notice that lake in the background. nasa is getting lazy.

even if this was somehow the rover's camera taking the picture, then explain the footprints to the left of it....

I'm not seeing foot prints? where are they?

reply to post by CALGARIAN

Also, check out the lens on the Rovers head.. IS that someone's outline?

Darth Vader?

Peace

reply to post by doesntmakesense


i'm not here to defend nasa.. or this picture.. or whatever.. but if you look at the tread on the rovers tires.. you will see how it matches the tread in the dirt.. like it backed up and rotated a few times.. honestly i don't care if it was redneck bobby who snapped this pic in the desert.. lmao

reply to post by Meldionne1


bottom left part of the picture, about 6 of them

Look CLOSELY at the reflection of the camera in the pic, you'll see ANOTHER CAMERA taking the pic
Read the story at the OP's link:

Two days ago, we showed one of the best rover selfies ever, which came from amateur astronomer Stuart Atkinson, who stitched together raw images beamed back from Curiosity. But the pictures used there were only thumbnail versions of the high-res pics. The above image represents the full-sized 5,400-pixel-wide version generated from the complete set of photographs. The detail is so stunning you can zoom in on Curiosity’s “eye” at the top and see a reflection of Mars and the rover’s arm.

What can be seen are tire tracks, scoops in the Martian dust that Curiosity made, and the foothills of the 3-mile-high Mount Sharp in the background

Mars Curioiosity: 1
Mars landing hoax debunkers: 0
Thank you for playing, come back again soon

I, too, have to wonder why the arm is not visible in the picture. Interesting.

Besides that, look at the tracks. Has that thing just been spinning in circles, doing doughnuts in the martian dirt? Bunch of jokers over at NASA.

I'd give Nasa # for the picture, but one in ten people still take at least one photo with their thumb in view.

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Originally posted by gorgi
Here is your answer.

Sorry no green people on Mars did this.

What?

Differnt picture.

Thats how the process is done for pictures in general, not necessarily this exact picture. I thought it was obvious.