It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For God to condemn you just to die for you is ridiculous and immoral
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
The bible is not uneditable. No matter what you say, the possibility that it has been edited will always be there. It would be so easy to do yet you seem so confident that it wasn't. How can you be so sure? You denying that possibility is ignore(ance). That is what you are doing, ignoring the possibility.edit on 5-11-2012 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by Greatest I am
Thanks for all this but I did not see if you embrace the notion of human sacrifice or not or if you believe that to punish the innocent instead of the guilty is good justice or not.
Care to share?
P.S. Anyone who dances around a simple question like you are doing knows he is on the wrong moral foot or he would give a clear yes or no.
Regards
DL
All pretext is based on twisted context. Paradox is created in such cases and I am simply showing you the proper context to your thoughts. What is a pretext? A reason given in justification of a course of action that is not the real reason. In this case, you equate mankind as innocent.
This is possibly based on a previous conversation you were having, but I will jump in anyway. We are veiled from a previous existence on a planet that is for fallen beings. Saying we are innocent denies God's goodness for allowing baptism as repentance. On this point you are inferring that you are above God. Pride does this. Most of those who deny God's goodness here will fall into this trap. There are few Atheists. In reality, there are many that do not agree with God.
For me to answer the question, I need your context and not a hidden pretext. Explain your own view and I can then clarify my answer in relation.
edit on 4-11-2012 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by Greatest I am
I said for no reason, it's ok to kill in self-defense but only if you have no other choice but to kill.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Until you open up to the possibility that it's not infallible then you will never see. The bible is a book, books are written by the hands of men, men are prone to lying.
Where did you get the belief that the bible could never be edited? How can you be so sure that it hasn't been edited?
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
[ Yet, if you read Paul's words, you see that it's by faith and not works. YES!!!! Because Christ is the one one who could have done what we cannot. This was the point. It's the larger context that matters. Paul had it right.
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
This is where I take a more Swedenborgian approach to scripture. I do not think that most Christians are correct in stating Jesus died for our sins. Sin is not transferred in such a manner. Rather, I believe that for Jesus to die on the cross was the last temptation necessary for him to become merged with the divine. See, evil works on people through temptation, and the only way God will fight this type of evil at the moment is through us humans. This is partly why Jesus had to die on the cross, although it may still seem counter intuitive the way I explain it, lol.
It still confuses me, although sometimes I think I have a good grasp on things. If anyone is interested in actually having this belief explained in a way that does it justice, look up the work of Swedenborg, who was someone who claimed that he had dreams where he was shown certain things by God. While others, like Smith of the Mormon faith, among others, have made claims like this, Swedenborg was quite different. Not only in one area either. There were even some psychic type events that were documented relatively well that occurred with him, which may bolster his claims to some. He really was quite different from most people we would think of today as charlatans, and he was opposed, it would seem, to organized religion to some degree. Maybe not organized religion itself, but certain types of it.
Originally posted by 0mage
reply to post by Greatest I am
for you to take the word so literally and unimaginatively is what's ridiculous!
2 cents not paid.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by Greatest I am
For God to condemn you just to die for you is ridiculous and immoral
He gives you a way to opt out, if you don't take it, thats your fault and we'll be kicking the dust off our shoes and walking on.
As for me? I'll be walking the line.