The mayan calendar end date is not 2012, its 2087, 100% proof here., page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 4-11-2012 @ 01:58 PM by xxshadowfaxx
For those of you that don't understand how the Mayan Calendar works, I will break it down for you, and show you how long each cycle is and how the year 2012 is wrong. I am getting my information from the book, The end of days by zecharia sitchin, and it makes complete sense and is mathematically sound. I have backtracked myself, and done the math, over and over again, researching all sorts of different cycles, and I have found that the real end day of the Mayans is not til the year 2087, just like sitchin found. I know many of you are against sitchins work, but this really has nothing to do with him, as the math speaks for itself. Here are the cycles to the Mayan Calandar.

1 kin = 1 day
1 uinal = 1 kin x 20 = 20 days
1 tun = 1 kin x 360 = 360 days
1 ka-tun = 1 tun x 20 = 7200 days
1 bak-tun = 1 ka-tun x 20 = 144,000 days
1 pictun = 1 bak-tun x 20 = 2,880,000 days

So given that information, we know that the end of the 12th bak-tun and the start of the 13th, signifies the end of the cycle, the end date. So you when take 144,000 and multiply it by 13, you get, 1,872,000 days.

This is where it gets tricky. As you can see, the mayans used a sexagesimal numerical system. They called one year to be 360 days. Not 365.25 as in our current calendar. So when you take the 1,872,000 days, and you divide it by 360, you get, 5200 years. When you take the same number and you divide it by 365.25, you get 5125 years, which doesn't make any sense because that is no longer a part of the sexagesimal system.

The start date of the Mayan calendar, is supposed to be august 11th, 3113 BC so when you take 5125 years, and go into the future, you come up with the year 2012, right down to dec 21st. However, this is inaccurate because the math has taken two different calculation and combined them. They have taken our current calendar year, and mixed it with the mayans sexagesimal system, how can that be accurate, when the mayan themselves weren't doing the math with 365.25 in mind.

However, when you do the math properly, and divide 360 into 1,872,000, you get a mathmatically sound 5200 years. So when you add the 5200 onto the 3113BC, you get the year, 2087AD.... That is when the end of the calender occurs, if you are using mayan only calculations. Why would we use any other calculations? That just doesn't make any sense. So the mayan calendar is far from over! It won't even end in most of our lifetimes. This is something that our children will see, and hopefully it is the dawn of a new age and not the destruction of the world. I just hope we can make it to 2087 without killing ourselves first.

The math speaks for itself. We simply made the wrong calculations, by adding our own calendar into the mix.


reply posted on 4-11-2012 @ 02:08 PM by ThoughtIsMadness
reply to post by xxshadowfaxx



When you use words like "supposed" then you lose all credibility and have no right to have 100% proof in your title.
this is another example of moving the goal posts for the apocalyptic end date. What happens when the calendar ends you ask. you get a free one in the mail and it starts over. Not entirely unlike all the threads about the END TIMES......... pce
edit on 4-11-2012 by ThoughtIsMadness because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 4-11-2012 @ 02:12 PM by MonkeyFishFrog
reply to post by xxshadowfaxx



Have you spoken to a Mayan about this? Who is your source of information? How do you know they are 100% accurate when it comes to the Mayan calendar?

The world will end when the world will end. No stone tablet is going to lay down an exact date.


reply posted on 4-11-2012 @ 02:37 PM by gnosticagnostic
reply to post by xxshadowfaxx



LMAO that would only hold true if we as well used 360 days instead of 365.... FAIL


reply posted on 4-11-2012 @ 02:41 PM by baburak
reply to post by xxshadowfaxx



all i have to say is FU i thought it will be the end of "Mayan calendar" threads after 21.12 .. but now i see i'll have to read about it for the next 75 years



reply posted on 4-11-2012 @ 02:50 PM by xxshadowfaxx
Originally posted by ThoughtIsMadness
reply to
post by xxshadowfaxx



When you use words like "supposed" then you lose all credibility and have no right to have 100% proof in your title.
this is another example of moving the goal posts for the apocalyptic end date. What happens when the calendar ends you ask. you get a free one in the mail and it starts over. Not entirely unlike all the threads about the END TIMES......... pce
edit on 4-11-2012 by ThoughtIsMadness because: (no reason given)


The calendar is supposed to have started on august 11th 3113BC.... That is the date everyone from all fields is working with. Do we have the start date wrong maybe.... But using the word supposed in this context has nothing to do with the mathematical calculations. So please don't twist the words around.


reply posted on 4-11-2012 @ 03:03 PM by MonkeyFishFrog
reply to post by xxshadowfaxx



Did you consider/incorporate leap years when you were doing your calculations?


reply posted on 4-11-2012 @ 03:12 PM by xxshadowfaxx
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog



Leap years only apply to the current calendar we use, hence the 365.25.

The mayans simply calculation in the number of days. 360 days was one of their cycles, all the rest of their cycles stemmed off of the 360 day calculation. So when you simply count the number of days using their calendar, you get the year 2087. Nothing else matters. 1,872,000 days after august 11th, 3113BC is 2087AD, when using their calendar.

If you use our calendar, and forget about their 360 days cycle, and change it to 365.25, you get 2012AD.... which changes the entire math of their calendar, made up by modern day people, not by what the ancients calculation themselves. The entire 2012 end date is based on calculations of modern scientists. But clearly the ancients knew more than we do, and with their calculations its 2087. Leap years don't matter when you're counting days, not years.


reply posted on 4-11-2012 @ 03:23 PM by Unity_99
reply to post by xxshadowfaxx



What I'm trying to say is I think it may be later like you say, and that the days should be marked according to the mayan calendar. But that TPTB have chosen that date and also, these energies are coming in and could be for some time. We need to transmute the energies turn it to Love, Joy, Bliss and Equality, Freedom for every single man woman and child on this planet.

I've given you a star and flag just for coming up with alternative math and doing a lot of work with this. Its a good effort and it may be the right one.
edit on 4-11-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 4-11-2012 @ 03:29 PM by eriktheawful
Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
For those of you that don't understand how the Mayan Calendar works, I will break it down for you, and show you how long each cycle is and how the year 2012 is wrong. I am getting my information from the book, The end of days by zecharia sitchin, and it makes complete sense and is mathematically sound. I have backtracked myself, and done the math, over and over again, researching all sorts of different cycles, and I have found that the real end day of the Mayans is not til the year 2087, just like sitchin found. I know many of you are against sitchins work, but this really has nothing to do with him, as the math speaks for itself. Here are the cycles to the Mayan Calandar.

1 kin = 1 day
1 uinal = 1 kin x 20 = 20 days
1 tun = 1 kin x 360 = 360 days
1 ka-tun = 1 tun x 20 = 7200 days
1 bak-tun = 1 ka-tun x 20 = 144,000 days
1 pictun = 1 bak-tun x 20 = 2,880,000 days



I'm afraid your math is off a bit there:

Mayan Calendar


Table of Long Count units
Days Long Count period Long Count unit Approximate Solar Years
1 day = 1 K'in
20 days = 20 K'in or 1 Winal
360 days = 18 Winal or 1 Tun or 1 Solar Year
7,200 days = 20 Tun or 1 K'atun or 20 Solar years
144,000 days = 20 K'atun or 1 B'ak'tun or 394 Solar years
2,880,000 days = 20 B'ak'tun or 1 Piktun or 7885 Solar years

Solar or Tropical Year =

The mean tropical year, as of January 1, 2000 was 365.2421897 or 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, 45.19 seconds. This changes slowly; an expression suitable for calculating the length in days for the distant past is 365.2421896698 − 6.15359×10^−6T − 7.29×10^−10T^2 + 2.64×10^−10T^3


A Solar or Tropical Year is not the same as a Calendar Year.

Back to the Mayan Calendar:

The Long Count calendar identifies a date by counting the number of days from the Mayan creation date 4 Ahaw, 8 Kumk'u (August 11, 3114 BC in the proleptic Gregorian calendar or September 6 in the Julian calendar). But instead of using a base-10 (decimal) scheme like Western numbering, the Long Count days were tallied in a modified base-20 scheme. Thus 0.0.0.1.5 is equal to 25, and 0.0.0.2.0 is equal to 40. As the winal unit resets after only counting to 18, the Long Count consistently uses base-20 only if the tun is considered the primary unit of measurement, not the k'in; with the k'in and winal units being the number of days in the tun. The Long Count 0.0.1.0.0 represents 360 days, rather than the 400 in a purely base-20 (vigesimal) count.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Pane andov - expected cosmic events in 2012-2013
  Posted 8 days ago with 9 member flags
Near Earth Asteroid Sept 14 2012
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags
Let\'s take a look at the PoleShift/PlanetX doomsayers, shall we?
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
2012 Is not the End.
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags