It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Spacewalk, it is a famous or infamous photo depending on POV. What piqued my interest was that it seems to have been redacted from the latter publications of the book. I saw it in a '74 Ballantine paperback. I'll post a copy if I can find it. It is public domain stuff, NASA photo. I think Ralph Rene was the first to point this out publicly, but my father actually showed it to me before Rene had said anything about it in public. Rene featured both the spacewalk and vomit comet shots in his introduction and argued NASA has been lying habitually.
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Could some please explain to me this part of the thread title?:
"Moon dust confirmed to be Fly ash"
Did I miss the part of the OP where he confirmed this -- or even provided any evidence whatsoever supporting the specific hypothesis stated in the tile??
In short: he didn't.
And yes we have found the facility where the lunar remote control scale models were filmed.. In a vacuum chamber in Ohio with fly ash as the moon dust.
Something I have not heard discussed is the fact the astronauts brought large amounts of moon dust into the Lunar landing module. If the suits protected them whilst they were on the moon the amount on these suits brought back into the module would have been lethal. How did they ensure they were not harmed by the radiation coming from the dust on the space suits?
We have already established a scale model was used for the the lunar rover footage, so the size of the vacuum chamber is not as important.
Static driver prop.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by XaniMatriX
Because if you're going to compare apples to apples (Apollo to the shuttle), you can't say use 1970s dollars, and compare them to 2000s dollars. The value of the dollar changes quite a bit over time. If you want to compare them, you have to show the same value amount.
Originally posted by rolfharriss
We have already established a scale model was used for the the lunar rover footage, so the size of the vacuum chamber is not as important.
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
Originally posted by rolfharriss
We have already established a scale model was used for the the lunar rover footage, so the size of the vacuum chamber is not as important.
No rolf, you haven't established anything of the sort.
Originally posted by rolfharriss
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
Originally posted by rolfharriss
We have already established a scale model was used for the the lunar rover footage, so the size of the vacuum chamber is not as important.
No rolf, you haven't established anything of the sort.
But all of the astronauts in the Lunar rover footage are clearly dummies, this means the footage has been faked. What more proof do you need.