It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by rolfharriss
Nasa didn't put stars in because that would have been impossible to fake, one mistake - photo overlap and it is blown. The distance of stars is hard to replicate on a backdrop. Also they would have have to have taken the star photos from the moon itself - because of the slight difference in perspective from the Earth.
Easily done by computer. You can do it yourself:
www.stellarium.org...
You need to find a better answer. Use your knowledge of photography.
They didn't have Stelarium in 1969 ! Are you suggesting they should have travelled to the future to use to use a computer program to take photos of the stars for use in the Apollo hoax photos.. Are you on Hallucinogens?
Originally posted by rolfharriss
So the camera which recorded the decent of the lander has the exposure time set back on Earth?
With the thousands of images of the lunar surface did all of these use the same exposure time and aperture? Or was it adjusted to each shot along the way?
Through all this effort it was not considered prudent to get one shot of the stars?
Through all this effort it was not considered prudent to get one shot of the stars?
Originally posted by rolfharriss
So the camera which recorded the decent of the lander has the exposure time set back on Earth?
With the thousands of images of the lunar surface did all of these use the same exposure time and aperture? Or was it adjusted to each shot along the way?
Through all this effort it was not considered prudent to get one shot of the stars?
Originally posted by rolfharriss
This photo proves the moon dust in the apollo photos is fake as it has no resemblance to www.mentallandscape.com...
Originally posted by rolfharriss
So the camera which recorded the decent of the lander has the exposure time set back on Earth?
With the thousands of images of the lunar surface did all of these use the same exposure time and aperture? Or was it adjusted to each shot along the way?
Through all this effort it was not considered prudent to get one shot of the stars?
Originally posted by rolfharriss
Here is the problem when you say these are the cameras that were used.. That is a leap of faith that is not evidence. That is the same as me saying I was told by an astronaut they faked the landings.
People exposing the hoax have to stick to the truth, but people arguing against it can produce new 'evidence' from thin air.
This has been happening for years a steady assimilation of new information into the old account.
The whole nonsense of advanced alien technology is just to throw off the conspiracy theorists with something more interesting.
Threadkillers are here to keep the moon hoax off the top of recent posts, but it is a moral duty to keep debating it everyday until the truth is out.
Originally posted by rolfharriss
"the LM did not land straight down it had some lateral movement," your mate wm
Take a look at the -Y footpad in AS11-40-5850. You can see where the probe dragged along the ground (green arrows), as well as radial striations (red arrows) emanating from the direction of the engine bell (click on the image to see the whole thing, it's wide):
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Originally posted by rolfharriss
Here is the problem when you say these are the cameras that were used.. That is a leap of faith that is not evidence. That is the same as me saying I was told by an astronaut they faked the landings.
People exposing the hoax have to stick to the truth, but people arguing against it can produce new 'evidence' from thin air.
This has been happening for years a steady assimilation of new information into the old account.
The whole nonsense of advanced alien technology is just to throw off the conspiracy theorists with something more interesting.
Threadkillers are here to keep the moon hoax off the top of recent posts, but it is a moral duty to keep debating it everyday until the truth is out.
And that's your problem.
By your logic, any evidence YOU produce we have to take on faith too.
Can you prove that these cameras were NOT used? Can you show evidence that other cameras were used?
By the way - none of us that support the moon landings as historical fact are not "threadkillers". We are ATS members that are debating you in your thread.
If you don't want people to debate things you post or discuss it with you, then it would seem ATS is not the place for you. Some other forum, like GLP would be better suited to your needs.
No one has a gun to your head forcing you to be here and argue with any of us. If it bothers you that much then it would seem your choices are clear:
1) stop posting in or making Moon Hoax Landing threads.
or
2) Find another online site / medium that will not allow people to debate you.