posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 03:23 PM
It seems to me that this is a necessary evil in defence.
The school would have to make all attempts to prevent the loss of finances. That's pretty obvious.
As a part of their defence, one of the arguments is detailed. Yes, it might be disgusting, it might be unfair and make little sense, but this is
standard legal defence against accusations. As they stated, it's one of nine possible defence arguments, it doesn't mean a jury is gonna buy that
for one second!
Although I agree that it's not right, I can understand the point of this and agree that the media is blowing it out of all proportion. The defence
team HAS to use all methods they can to defend against the case, otherwise they are not doing their job. This is just one of those avenues of
I think there are just a lot of people who cannot understand this and jumping on the band wagon.