Report: Islamist radicals find warm welcome in Obama White House

page: 2
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 03:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247

Please. If I would have said anything racist, the mods would have deleted my post. Anyone else with a knowledge of recent history and an ear for sarcasm would easily understand the context of my statement.


You appear somewhat confused. You stated


Originally posted by sheepslayer247

So please, let's not start this crap again. There is no reason to be scared of the brown-skinned Muslims and they are not terrorists.



You did throw out the race card in a clumsy attempt to stop anyone questioning why Obama has had so many Muslim groups with links to jihadists at the White House.


Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Islamophobia is a real issue that has been at the forefront of religious relations at least since 2001.

Just because other religions are not demonized in the American media and in the agenda of a certain political group, does not mean that Islamophobia doesn't exist.



Have left wing apologists for radical Islam never pondered why the words Christophobia, Hunduphobia or Buddaphobia do not exist?

Is it perhaps because only Islam engages in jihad?




Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Ok. It must be a Marxist, socialist conspiracy to force the pansies within the Republican party to fear Muslims! I got it now.


No conspiracy is necessary. Since 9/11 Muslims in the USA has tried to



• Destroy the Brooklyn bridge

• Blow up an Ohio shopping mall

• Blow up the New York stock exchange

• Blow up the NY subway

• Blow up an Indian diplomat with a shoulder fired grenade launcher

• Blow up National Guard facilities and synagogues in the LA area

• Blow up the Wyoming natural gas refinery & the Transcontinental Pipeline

• Set off a dirty bomb in the USA

• Blow up the US Capitol and Word Bank Headquarters

• Blow up the Sears tower in Chicago

• Blow up NY city train tunnels

• Set off hand grenades in a shopping mall outside Chicago

• Conspiring to attack Fort Dix, New Jersey

• Set off a TAPT bomb in the NY subway

• Blow up a Dallas skyscraper

• Set off a car bomb outside the courthouse in downtown Springfield, Illinois

• Murder civilians in US shopping malls

• Blow up “aviation fuel tanks and pipelines at the John F. Kennedy International Airport”

• Shoot down planes with stinger missiles.

Link




posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 03:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vitruvian
reply to post by ollncasino
 

AND -------------
Undercover photo capture during the secret meeting. The bald pate at the lower right of the (cropped) picture is that of Nihad Awad (see below) I am trying to locate an uncropped version of that picture plus any other photos of the event.


As promised - the un-cropped version of photo of secret Pelosi meeting mentioned above.
As a matter of fact, I wonder why it was ever cropped in the first place?


From this site -
First few paragraphs:

During one of history's most important presidential campaigns, former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) appears to many observers to be uncharacteristically quiet. However, many believe she's merely allowing the dust to settle after the blogosphere discovered her campaign fundraiser with what many describe as "unsavory characters," according to an Investigative Project on Terrorism report on Friday.

Besides raising money during her secretive fundraiser, Pelosi plotted the downfall of former U.S. Army Lt. Col. Allen West, a U.S. Congressman from Florida, and other Republicans with the support of Islamists.

Democratic leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi proudly headlined the high-dollar, but secret, campaign fundraiser last May that was attended by Islamist groups and individuals linked by the U.S. government to the Hamas jihad group and to the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood movement.
edit on 3-11-2012 by Vitruvian because: txt



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 03:26 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 



You did throw out the race card in a clumsy attempt to stop anyone questioning why Obama has had so many Muslim groups with links to jihadists at the White House.


No, I made the comment because the hard-Right uses fear and race to get the base all worked-up. You know that, but insist on playing games. I'm still waiting for evidence to prove that these people are linked to terror groups. A Bush executive order is proof of nothing except that they want them to pay taxes.



Have left wing apologists for radical Islam never pondered why the words Christophobia, Hunduphobia or Buddaphobia do not exist?



It's because there is no widespread fear being perpetuated by certain political groups against Christianity and others. Islam is being portrayed as a radical religion and that breeds fear and ignorance...which is illustrated by your next statement.



Is it perhaps because only Islam engages in jihad?


*sigh* The good ole jihad argument.

I've never been threatened by a Muslim, nor do I fear them. Your list is comprised of things that these "Jihadists" have not been able to accomplish...and you fear a group that can't even pull it off?

Well, at least I am grateful that you have proven my point. It all comes down to fear. Fear of Muslims, Jihad and....hell I bet you fear the Hamburgler! Pretty sad existence if you ask me.

Here is an idea: Put on your big-boy panties, go out into your community and meet the local Muslims. I will guarantee that you have a few of them around your area. After you get the nerve to talk to them, come back and tell me if they tried to blow you up....or if they offered you a fresh baked cookie.


edit on 3-11-2012 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 03:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
*sigh* The good ole jihad argument.

I've never been threatened by a Muslim, nor do I fear them.


No. Apparently you buy cookies from your local mosque.


Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Here is an idea: Put on your big-boy panties, go out into your community and meet the local Muslims. I will guarantee that you have a few of them around your area. After you get the nerve to talk to them, come back and tell me if they tried to blow you up....or if they offered you a fresh baked cookie.


Cookies again? What is it with you and cookies?

Big boy pants?

Do they let you out of the house on your own?


Originally posted by sheepslayer247

I'm still waiting for evidence to prove that these people are linked to terror groups.


So you didn't actually even look at the report then?

Why doesn't that surprise me.


• U.S. District Court Judge Jorge Solis later ruled that, "The Government has produced ample evidence to establish the association" of CAIR to Hamas, upholding their designations as unindicted co-conspirators. In 2008, the FBI formally ended all contact with CAIR because of its ties to Hamas.

• Louay Safi, formerly executive director of the Islamic Society of North America, visited the White House twice – meeting in intimate settings with Paul Monteiro on June 29, 2011 and July 8, 2011. Law enforcement first noticed Safi in 1995 when his voice was captured in an FBI wiretap of now-convicted Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Sami Al-Arian. At the time of his conversation with Al-Arian, Safi served as executive director of the International Institute of Islamic Thought, an organization listed in law-enforcement and in internal Muslim Brotherhood documents as one of the movement's top front groups in North America.

• Esam Omeish, former head of the Muslim Brotherhood-created Muslim American Society, visited the White House three times. In 2000, Omeish personally hired the late terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki to be the imam of Falls Church, VA, Dar al-Hijrah mosque. According to IPT analysis, more terrorists have been linked to Dar al-Hijrah since 9/11 than to any other mosque in America. Omeish publicly mourned the Israeli airstrike that killed Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin at an April 10, 2004, MAS conference.

Report: A Red Carpet for Radicals at the White House


Try reading the report. It may challenge some of your politically correct assumptions.



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 




Cookies again? What is it with you and cookies?


You didn't catch the play on words and the attempt at witty correlation? See, that means......nm.



Do they let you out of the house on your own?


Only if I am wearing a helmet and I promise not to lick the bus windows.



So you didn't actually even look at the report then? Why doesn't that surprise me.


Yes, I read it. I still do not see any evidence. It is all an attempt to insinuate guilt by association. The key term used: Unindicted co-conspirator.



An unindicted co-conspirator, or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment. Prosecutors choose to name persons as unindicted co-conspirators for a variety of reasons including grants of immunity, pragmatic considerations, and evidentiary concerns.



The United States Attorneys' Manual generally recommends against naming unindicted co-conspirators, although their use is not generally prohibited by law or policy.[1] Some commentators have raised due process concerns over the use of unindicted co-conspirators.[2] Although there have been few cases on the subject, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed these concerns in United States v. Briggs.


So again, I ask where is the evidence to prove your assertion? You have to admit that there is none. Therefore, this website and what they imply is nothing more than hogwash until such time that evidence can backup their claims.



Try reading the report. It may challenge some of your politically correct assumptions.


Try some critical thinking. It may challenge some of your fear-based pre-conceived notions.

It's been fun, but I have to catch the bus.....have you seen my helmet?



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 04:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247

You didn't catch the play on words and the attempt at witty correlation? See, that means......nm.


You aren't very witty?


Originally posted by sheepslayer247

Yes, I read it. I still do not see any evidence. It is all an attempt to insinuate guilt by association. The key term used: Unindicted co-conspirator.


Duh...

The whole point is that the Muslim organizations invited to the White House are associated with jihadist groups.

Congratulations on missing the whole point of the thread.

You know, the OP was a give away. Maybe you should have read it?


Originally posted by OllnCasino

A year long investigation has revealed that Obama has hosted a series of meetings with radical Islamic groups with ties to jihadi groups while top White House officials have had hundreds of meetings with those radicals.



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 04:41 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 




The whole point is that the Muslim organizations invited to the White House are associated with jihadist groups.


No, the OP and your link only "insinuates" that these people were connected to extremist groups. Where is the proof?



Congratulations on missing the whole point of the thread.


No I got it. You think Obama let terrorist sympathizers into the White House. But there is no evidence to suggest they are "Islamist radicals" or that they are tied to jihadist groups. Just because a NeoCon website said it's true and Bush made them pay taxes through executive order does not prove anything.

So I will patiently wait for you to provide evidence that these people are radical Islamists and that they are ties to jihadist groups.



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 04:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Logarock

Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by Logarock
 





Well the dems drop thier share of bombs and the republicans are not bad at international relations.


I agree with the first part, but not the second. Republican neo-cons have ruined our standing with the world.


You sound like a sound bite. I spoze when dems drop bombs the reaction is diff. Oh no the dems know how to bomb in good measure and know when to stop. No, no I know what it is....the world knows that when dems drop bombs that they really dont mean anything by it and are simply misguilded......but not those blood sucking republicans.....oooohhhhh nooooo.


As a non-American, I would say that the majority of the world saw your Pres Bush declaring war on Iraq and Afghanistan based on BS, securing the oil fields and highly lucrative deals for him and his billionaire buddies. As it turns out, there were no weapons of mass destruction, and neither the US nor UK were within "minutes" of being attacked. In case you don't remember, Bin Laden supposedly attacked America, not Iraq, and not Afghanistan.

I know it's hard to get your head around that, but America was lied to on a daily basis by Bush and his cronies in their lust for war and profits, and you all swallowed it willingly, suddenly forgetting who attacked you and assuming it was one of those nations, or both.

While I don't agree with a lot of what Obama has done (especially not drone strikes) it is a fact that Bush - REPUBLICAN - invaded two nations under BS pretences.

No matter how you'd like to spin it, those are the facts.



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 04:59 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 


All it takes is one right wing troll blog post to get the Obama-haters all stirred up.

Meanwhile, care to tell me WHY IN THE BLUE HELL anyone should vote for Romney?

Hmm?



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 05:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by David9176
I know diplomacy is difficult for Repubs to get their arms around, but yes, there are other ways to get out of conflicts besides dropping a bomb on someone.


Cause his diplomacy has worked so well in Syria, Egypt and Libya, and Iran right?

Im dumfounded that you can even bring up Obama and the word diplomacy even in the same paragraph , after the death of a DIPLOMAT under Obamas watch.........

edit on 3-11-2012 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
No, the OP and your link only "insinuates" that these people were connected to extremist groups. Where is the proof?


Err, do you have a reading comprehension problem?

CAIR leader convicted on terror charges

Judge upholds CAIR official’s conviction in terrorism funding case


•In 2008, CAIR was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist money laundering case in U.S. history – the trial of the Holy Land Foundation in which five HLF officials were convicted of funneling money to Hamas. In 2008, the FBI formally ended all contact with CAIR because of its ties to Hamas.

• Hatem Abudayyeh – executive director of the Chicago-based Arab American Action Network, founded by Rashid Khalidi, a friend of President Obama. Abudayyeh has been under criminal investigation at least since September 2010, when FBI agents raided his home and office in connection with a terror-support probe.

• Louay Safi, formerly executive director of the Islamic Society of North America, visited the White House twice. Law enforcement first noticed Safi in 1995 when his voice was captured in an FBI wiretap of now-convicted Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Sami Al-Arian.

• Esam Omeish, former head of the Muslim Brotherhood-created Muslim American Society, visited the White House three times. In 2000, Omeish personally hired the late terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki to be the imam of Falls Church, VA, Dar al-Hijrah mosque. According to IPT analysis, more terrorists have been linked to Dar al-Hijrah since 9/11 than to any other mosque in America.

• Hisham al-Talib–A founder and current VP of Finance for Herndon, VA-based, International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), an organization the FBI believes has housed key Muslim Brotherhood leaders in the United States since the late 1980s.

A Red Carpet for Radicals at the White House


I really hope you are at least getting paid for spreading your disinformation.

Where is the proof?


Just you keep eating those Islamic cookies...



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 06:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247

You did throw out the race card in a clumsy attempt to stop anyone questioning why Obama has had so many Muslim groups with links to jihadists at the White House.


You seem to be the one using fear and race though....You took a religious issue and turned in to one about race for no apparent reason, other than to incite fear.

You hard leftists have no idea how far gone you've become. Race is everything to you.



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 06:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by detachedindividual

While I don't agree with a lot of what Obama has done (especially not drone strikes) it is a fact that Bush - REPUBLICAN - invaded two nations under BS pretences.

No matter how you'd like to spin it, those are the facts.


I don't think you understand how the US government works and you're definitely not very informed on how we got in to Iraq. Needless to say, Democrats supported and promoted the invasion. Going all the way back to the Clinton admin and his regime change policy in Iraq.

Spare me your hypocritical outrage. What ever happened to all that international anger over Gitmo?



posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 06:41 PM
link   
...
edit on 3-11-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)





new topics




 
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join