It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Islamic hardliners became incensed after a teacher at the prestigious private school allegedly made a mistake while copying Islamic text from an exercise book and then distributed the text to her students.The teacher was in hiding today but the school’s 77-year-old principal has been arrested and remains in police custody.
Meanwhile, the school’s management have today denied all responsibility for the ‘dirty act’ and called for the teacher, Arfa Iftikhar, to be punished. Ms Iftikhar allegedly set homework - for her students to do during Eid holidays from 26 to 29 October - which supposedly made derogatory references to the Prophet Mohammad.
According to the AFP, a search has been launched for Ms Iftikhar and Asim Farooqi, the school’s headmaster, has been remanded in custody for 14 days on charges of blasphemy. Pakistan’s laws on blasphemy are extremely strict and charges can carry the death penalty.
Daily Mail
The laws have been contentious since the formation of Pakistan in 1947, but have been especially in the spotlight since a Christian mother-of-five, Asia Bibi, was sentenced to death in November 2010 for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.
The following January Punjab Governor Salman Taseer - a prominent critic of the law - was assassinated by his bodyguard. The assassination divided Pakistan, with some hailing his killer as a hero.
In March 2011 Religious Minorities Minister Shahbaz Bhatti, a Christian who spoke out against the laws, was shot dead in Islamabad.
In 1986, a separate clause was inserted to punish blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad and the penalty recommended was "death, or imprisonment for life", in that order.
BBC
Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, secretary-general of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), said the international community should "come out of hiding from behind the excuse of freedom of expression", a reference to Western arguments against a universal blasphemy law that the OIC has sought for over a decade.
He said the "deliberate, motivated and systematic abuse of this freedom" were a danger to global security and stability.
Separately, the Human Rights Commission of the OIC, which has 57 members and is based in Saudi Arabia, said "growing intolerance towards Muslims" had to be checked and called for "an international code of conduct for media and social media to disallow the dissemination of incitement material".
Reuters
Originally posted by chadderson
When a civilization that has flourished for thousands of years upholds their laws that have survived the ages... we think we can question the practices, when this country has not even been around for a quarter of the time?
Originally posted by chadderson
If someone is spreading lies, it should be stopped. When an ancient civilization, in which almost all of its inhabitants conform to a specific belief... that also has been successful for AGES.... upholds its views against outsiders that think they 'know better' than them, i believe it is justified.
You are astonished at the impact of the penalty if i had to guess. Thats just how they do it over there. They have existed far longer than the USA as a civilization and culture.
Originally posted by chadderson
reply to post by ollncasino
It seems you believe you have the answer. If someone is spreading lies, it should be stopped. When an ancient civilization, in which almost all of its inhabitants conform to a specific belief... that also has been successful for AGES.... upholds its views against outsiders that think they 'know better' than them, i believe it is justified.
You are astonished at the impact of the penalty if i had to guess. Thats just how they do it over there. They have existed far longer than the USA as a civilization and culture. In wisdom one learns that spewing negativity in any regard is frowned upon by the universe. To spew it towards the One? Bad idea.
If someone is spreading lies, it should be stopped.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I'd say it's their right to have whatever laws they want. It's their nation and it's a diverse world.
...carry the death sentence and are "often used to justify censorship, criminalisation, persecution and, in certain cases, the murder of members of political, racial and religious minorities,"
Link
Originally posted by chadderson
Who are we to judge what is good or what is bad?
Originally posted by bloodreviara
So let me get this strait, they want an international law that makes it illegal to make
fun of the prophet mohammund
Im so sick of morality being warped by religion it isnt even half amusing anymore,
it makes me sick.
Originally posted by TheMaverick
You know this was done, because it was a successful all girls school, and this won't do in a Islamic state, that wants complete sharīʿah.
Islam the religion of peace and they will kill YOU too prove it.
• Muhammad authorised the murder of a number of poets (male & female) who had mocked him. One poet was a mother sleeping with her young children. The Muslim assassin had to move the child aside before thrusting his dagger into her chest. Another victim was a male poet who was, according to Muslim sources, over 100 years old. Mohammed then absolved the Islamic murderers of any wrong doing.
• He was also an accomplished caravan raider who had the propensity to execute prisoners who had been political opponents in the past. One such man had fallen foul of Muhammad when Muhammad was in his early days due to being a better story teller than Muhammad,. "Who will look after my young daughter?" cried the man, moments before he was executed. Muhammad then cursed him.
The Life of Muhammad (768 AD) by Ibn Ishaq
Originally posted by khimbar
I say threatening to kill a teacher over a homework mistake based on a fairy tale book written thousands of years ago is bad.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I'd say it's their right to have whatever laws they want. It's their nation and it's a diverse world.
Pakistan blasphemy laws used to justify 'murder': EU parliament
The EU has stated that Pakistan's blasphemy laws
...carry the death sentence and are "often used to justify censorship, criminalisation, persecution and, in certain cases, the murder of members of political, racial and religious minorities,"
Link
Pakistan may have the legal right to persecute political, racial and religious minorities. That doesn't make it right.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by khimbar
I say threatening to kill a teacher over a homework mistake based on a fairy tale book written thousands of years ago is bad.
Of course, people may say that Western Muslims, unlike Pakistani Muslims are a more moderate bunch. But is that necessarily true?
Poll: Nearly Half of U.S. Muslims Believe That Critics of Muhammad Should Be Criminally Prosecuted
Not only do half believe people should be prosecuted for criticizing Islam, an eighth believe they should be executed!