It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by SplitInfinity
How good are the Chinese and Russians at "reverse engineering" American Tech? Im not talking about WW2 either, as an example. We know they can copy, but are their skills good enough to mass produce quality work?
China has long copied foreign technology, not always successfully. One of these unsuccessful efforts is becoming a major embarrassment, to the point where government officials are complaining about it openly. While the Chinese government tries to control news of leadership conflicts, they often allow arguments to go public when it is believed some public debate might do some good.
Such is the case with the uneven effort to manufacture military jet engines in China. The basic problem is the inability of the state controlled aviation company (Aviation Industry Corporation of China) to master the most advanced manufacturing and quality control techniques.
The problem is the inability of state-run firms to operate as efficiently as their privately owned counterparts in the West. The public debate points to the continued inability to even achieve the lower (than in the West) manufacturing standards of Russia, whose state-run firms (during the Soviet period) were also never able to match Western standards.
Some Chinese officials urge privatizing the engine manufacturers, but many others oppose that on political (not wanting to admit defeat) or practical (losing direct control of a key military industry) grounds. Meanwhile, the manufacturing bureaucrats cannot cope, even after many years of effort and much money spent.
While some 20 percent of Chinese warplanes now use Chinese made engines, 80 percent do not and that is something the government has not been able to keep secret....
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by ATSWATCHER
reply to post by SplitInfinity
How old are you the fighters/strike fighters and f-117 were 100% late 80's 1990/1 upgrades !!!!!!!!
I am TOO OLD. You are incorrect. The F-15 program started in 1968. The F-117 program started in 1975. I will detail this out for you. The B-52 program started in 1949. Most of the weapon systems used in Iraq and Afghanistan are programs that are over 40 or 50 years old. How old are YOU!?
The following information is from 'The Encyclopedia of Modern Military Aircraft' - General Editor Paul Eden - which I always keep handy, "The beginning of today's F-15 Eagle occurred in February 1968 when Tactical Air Command chief General Gabriel P. Disosway signed off on an ROC (Required Operational Capability) statement. This held that any F-4 replacement to emerge from thee F-X (next-generation fighter) studies must be an air superiority fighter. In May 1968, USAF Chief of Staff General John P. McConnell endorsed Disosway's package and allocated to the F-X effort his services highest priority.
In August 1975, Lockheed and Northrop were invited to develop and test an aircraft known as the Experimental Survivable Testbed (XST). Both manufacturers designed small single seat aircraft. The results of radar tests gave Lockheed victory in the Have Blue demonstration program in April 1976.
Have Blue was the development of the Lockheed F-117.
I think you would do yourself a favor and at the very least research what i post before you condemn it as it makes you look silly when I have to prove myself. Split Infinity
Originally posted by peck420
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by peck420
Peck...the COVERT ULTRA-HIGH TECH WEAPON SYSTEMS that the U.S. has developed are HIDDEN with the total Military Budget. This is why it seems as if we are not getting our Moneys worth.
Do you honestly think that other countries don't have covert operations? Every major player has them.
The REALITY is that the COVERT PROGRAMS BUDGET is larger than many Countries entire GNP.
Split Infinity
And, once again, in terms of absolute dollars that means jack squat. If it costs you $1 million to make a cruise missile, and it costs the other guy $100,000 to make a comparable missile, does it matter if his budget is 10 times less? No it doesn't. You will both be getting the same number of missiles as a percentage of your overall budget.
The unfortunate truth is, every Western military budget is grossly inflated in comparison to their true purchasing power, and every 3rd world country is grossly deflated.
Unless you actually think that $100 USD will get you the same goods in China as it would in the US. Or Russia, or Brazil, or India, or South Africa, etc.
Originally posted by ATSWATCHER
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by ATSWATCHER
reply to post by SplitInfinity
How old are you the fighters/strike fighters and f-117 were 100% late 80's 1990/1 upgrades !!!!!!!!
I am TOO OLD. You are incorrect. The F-15 program started in 1968. The F-117 program started in 1975. I will detail this out for you. The B-52 program started in 1949. Most of the weapon systems used in Iraq and Afghanistan are programs that are over 40 or 50 years old. How old are YOU!?
The following information is from 'The Encyclopedia of Modern Military Aircraft' - General Editor Paul Eden - which I always keep handy, "The beginning of today's F-15 Eagle occurred in February 1968 when Tactical Air Command chief General Gabriel P. Disosway signed off on an ROC (Required Operational Capability) statement. This held that any F-4 replacement to emerge from thee F-X (next-generation fighter) studies must be an air superiority fighter. In May 1968, USAF Chief of Staff General John P. McConnell endorsed Disosway's package and allocated to the F-X effort his services highest priority.
In August 1975, Lockheed and Northrop were invited to develop and test an aircraft known as the Experimental Survivable Testbed (XST). Both manufacturers designed small single seat aircraft. The results of radar tests gave Lockheed victory in the Have Blue demonstration program in April 1976.
Have Blue was the development of the Lockheed F-117.
I think you would do yourself a favor and at the very least research what i post before you condemn it as it makes you look silly when I have to prove myself. Split Infinity
You are 100% wrong, the F-14/15/16/18's used in O.D.S. (Operation Desert Storm) we're nothing but the latest 1987-90 tech.
1. www.tim-thompson.com...
edit on 25-11-2012 by ATSWATCHER because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by RAY1990
Ray...what ever you could imagine the level of Tech. the U.S. currently has...it is even more shockingly Advanced. The U.S. has Weaponry at such High Levels of Tech. that some of this weaponry has classifications and doctrine as to why, when and under what circumstances some Weaponry would be used.
There is also what is known as LAST USE WEAPONS which are only meant to be used in the case of a Catastrophic Breakdown in the U.S. Military's ability to protect the U.S. Mainland. I would NOT want to be the Country on the receiving end of such weaponry. Split Infinity
Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
Originally posted by ATSWATCHER
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by ATSWATCHER
reply to post by SplitInfinity
How old are you the fighters/strike fighters and f-117 were 100% late 80's 1990/1 upgrades !!!!!!!!
I am TOO OLD. You are incorrect. The F-15 program started in 1968. The F-117 program started in 1975. I will detail this out for you. The B-52 program started in 1949. Most of the weapon systems used in Iraq and Afghanistan are programs that are over 40 or 50 years old. How old are YOU!?
The following information is from 'The Encyclopedia of Modern Military Aircraft' - General Editor Paul Eden - which I always keep handy, "The beginning of today's F-15 Eagle occurred in February 1968 when Tactical Air Command chief General Gabriel P. Disosway signed off on an ROC (Required Operational Capability) statement. This held that any F-4 replacement to emerge from thee F-X (next-generation fighter) studies must be an air superiority fighter. In May 1968, USAF Chief of Staff General John P. McConnell endorsed Disosway's package and allocated to the F-X effort his services highest priority.
In August 1975, Lockheed and Northrop were invited to develop and test an aircraft known as the Experimental Survivable Testbed (XST). Both manufacturers designed small single seat aircraft. The results of radar tests gave Lockheed victory in the Have Blue demonstration program in April 1976.
Have Blue was the development of the Lockheed F-117.
I think you would do yourself a favor and at the very least research what i post before you condemn it as it makes you look silly when I have to prove myself. Split Infinity
You are 100% wrong, the F-14/15/16/18's used in O.D.S. (Operation Desert Storm) we're nothing but the latest 1987-90 tech.
1. www.tim-thompson.com...
edit on 25-11-2012 by ATSWATCHER because: (no reason given)
SplitInfinity is correct.
All of the aircraft you are mentioning, the F-14/15/16/18's used in O.D.S. were designed in the 1960's. In some cases their avionics suite used 1980's technology (F-15E with its APG-70), in other cases not ( A-10 famously improvising a poor mans FLIR using the AGM-65D IR targeting display)
F-14's first flight was in 1970
F-15 maiden flight was 1972
F-16' first flight 1974
F/A-18 was 1978 but its prototype, the YF-17 flew with the YF-16 in 1974.
Out of curiosity, what point are you emphasizing by posting the order of battle for the Gulf War coalition air forces?
edit on 26-11-2012 by Drunkenparrot because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by ATSWATCHER
You need to do some reading.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by ATSWATCHER
What links? The only links you have put up are to a video of a supercavitating torpedo, and the OOB of Desert Storm. There's nothing to read.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
For those of you here on this board...I tell you this. Whatever you can think of as a possible U.S. Military High Tech Weapon...Multiply your thoughts times a THOUSAND! We have capabilities and Weaponry that scare even those who have designed it and if any Nation were to actually attempt a Sneak Attack...the U.S. Military would use some of this weaponry. These systems are WORLD CHANGING and even knowledge of their EXISTENCE would put Political Strains on our relations with other countries and even our own allies.
Originally posted by alldaylong
reply to post by SplitInfinity
So it beggers the question. Why won't the US get involved in Syria. The answer would be that they FEAR Russian and Chinese involvement.
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
This is not a troll answer but what I think:
9/11
If the USA had as powerful and advanced a military as people believed then 19 minimally funded hijackers wouldn't have pulled off what they did.
Originally posted by justwokeup
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by peck420
The OP is 100% dead on correct about how insanely advanced our military has got to be. It's got to be a relatively small but very advanced group....because no vet or serving member I know or am related to has seen what accounts for this:
U.S. Defense spending in global context
The spending...when I first realized the true scale of it in real terms of what those dollars ARE...made me sick. One of those gut moments. Our military is smaller than China, by a large margin. Yet look at the spending difference. Russia isn't dramatically less advanced if noticeably less so than we are....they've stolen most before we've had a prototype of our own. ...but R&D doesn't...even...begin...to explain that. Annual spending. Every 12 months. (???) Seeing the breakdown doesn't make it more logical either. No..The OP is right about the advanced core somewhere...and it's costing enough to have the Starship Enterprise every couple years, too.
edit on 2-11-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
On one hand there is the possibility that the USA is building the Death Star
The other possibility is epic, mind altering levels of waste, fraud and corruption hiding behind a web of secrecy so big and deep nobody understands all of it.
I suspect reality is actually in between.
edit on 2-11-2012 by justwokeup because: Typo
Originally posted by Confusion42
On the surface, it may "look" like the US military budget is inflated. However, your not taking into account
all of the "super secret" weapon's the US has, and the black budget's for them.
In your example, the US pays 1mil for a cruise missile, and other countries $100,000?
1,000 Cruise Missiles x $100,000 = $1,000,000 (One Hundred Million Dollars) Other Countries
1,000 Cruise Missiles x $1,000,000 = 1 Billion dollars USA
Over half of that 1 Billion goes towards development of super secret high tech weapons.
You don't really think the US Military pays $200 bucks per hammer, do you?