It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You're letting terminology get in the way of common sense. Yes, sperm is human life. Yes, the ovum is human life, but a fertilized egg is A human life.
DNA tests on all 3 can prove it if you like.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Your conclusion is fundamentally Flawed. I can do a DNA test on a STRAND OF HUMAN HAIR with a FOLLICLE....and it will give me the same data that a DNA test will give me on a Cell taken from a Clump of Cells that are dividing and have implanted themselves in the Uterine Wall.
The HAIR STRAND is NOT ALIVE but the Dead Hair cells will give me Living Cells still even those these Cells also have Human DNA these Cells will not have the ability to naturally grow into a Child.
Point is that just because something can be tested to have Human DNA does not mean it is a Human Being
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog
There's no sense debating the non sensible. Anyone who believes that a female should taught her role in society based on biology, and should die for objecting to her biological fate, isn't worth another finger flick on my keyboard.
.
Someone in one of these abortion threads mentioned: Medieval.
Pretty much sums it up.
BTW - - my role in society is anything I make it.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Bone75
I do not dispute your post as I was speaking in General Terms and of course you are right in that a Fertilized Egg would have Different DNA that the Cells of a Human Hair Follicle as the DNA would be different...but what my meaning was is that both HAVE Human DNA as well as the now DEAD Hair. The Hair was at one time a Living Cell that was excreted and containing Protein.
My Point is that just because something is ALIVE as you have used this argument that LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION. I stated that Life was present BEFORE conception as both the Egg and Sperm are independent LIFE FORMS. And thus to argue using the statement LIFE Begins at Conception is fundamentally flawed.
That is my point. Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Bone75
I do not dispute your post as I was speaking in General Terms and of course you are right in that a Fertilized Egg would have Different DNA that the Cells of a Human Hair Follicle as the DNA would be different...but what my meaning was is that both HAVE Human DNA as well as the now DEAD Hair. The Hair was at one time a Living Cell that was excreted and containing Protein.
My Point is that just because something is ALIVE as you have used this argument that LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION. I stated that Life was present BEFORE conception as both the Egg and Sperm are independent LIFE FORMS. And thus to argue using the statement LIFE Begins at Conception is fundamentally flawed.
That is my point. Split Infinity
Originally Posted by Bone75
You're letting terminology get in the way of common sense. Yes, sperm is human life. Yes, the ovum is human life, but a fertilized egg is A human life.
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog
There's no sense debating the non sensible. Anyone who believes that a female should taught her role in society based on biology, and should die for objecting to her biological fate, isn't worth another finger flick on my keyboard.
.
Someone in one of these abortion threads mentioned: Medieval.
Pretty much sums it up.
BTW - - my role in society is anything I make it.
Someone in this abortion thread mentioned: Parasites
Have I mentioned roaches yet?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Bone75
I NEVER SAID what you just quoted as I never had A LIVE in my statements. Your quote after your statement that says QUOTE is not my words also.
You are suiting and changing reality to your needs. Bad Move. Split Infinity
Originally posted by Bone75
Okay now that we've done a pretty good job of establishing that A life begins at conception, and that this is scientific fact that doesn't require belief. Shall we move on? Or are we still stuck on this?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog
There's no sense debating the non sensible. Anyone who believes that a female should taught her role in society based on biology, and should die for objecting to her biological fate, isn't worth another finger flick on my keyboard.
.
Someone in one of these abortion threads mentioned: Medieval.
Pretty much sums it up.
BTW - - my role in society is anything I make it.
Someone in this abortion thread mentioned: Parasites
Have I mentioned roaches yet?
Yes - - I stated a fetus is a Parasite - - - because that is exactly what it is.
Roaches? What you are trying to do is make personal insults.
i.word.com...
Senteit:
1 : responsive to or conscious of sense impressions
2 : AWARE
3 : finely sensitive in perception or feeling
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by Bone75
Okay now that we've done a pretty good job of establishing that A life begins at conception, and that this is scientific fact that doesn't require belief. Shall we move on? Or are we still stuck on this?
Life is present BEFORE CONCEPTION. This is the CRUX of the issue.