It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by windword
Even if you say that a fertilized egg or a fetus has the right to life, that right doesn't trump the right of the mother not to care for it. Slavery is illegal and t is also illegal to force someone to donate organs or blood, so why would it even be considered that we should force a woman to rent out her body for 9 months?
You enter into that contract the moment you LET sperm enter your love canal.
You may want your kids to come up in a world where sex has no consequences, but I sure don't.
I think we both want our children to grow up in a world where sex has consequences for both parties and not solely on the shoulders of women which we are seeing in this thread and real life.
As I said before, most of us learn sex ed at an early age. So from an early age the woman knows what her role is. It's not like she should be surprised if she gets pregnant. It is called Biology. Time to grow up and take responsibility for your actions instead of killing someone for a bad decision.
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
reply to post by Bone75
So then you must've applauded the hospital for this.
I don't even have to look at the link to know what you're referring to. And no, I don't applaud the hospital. That was a tragedy.
Should we also perform a genetic comparison to the fetus and then go kill the father too? He is just as responsible.
That's just silly, but genetic comparisons between fetuses and fathers is something I would whole-heartedly support.
But why aren't we doing that now?
Because that would give the father RIGHTS now wouldn't it?
edit on 15-11-2012 by Bone75 because: somehow erased the first sentence. no disrespect intended.edit on 15-11-2012 by Bone75 because: oops again. I think its fixed
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog
There's no sense debating the non sensible. Anyone who believes that a female should taught her role in society based on biology, and should die for objecting to her biological fate, isn't worth another finger flick on my keyboard.
Peace out/ until a more worthy discussion comes along. Something serious. I'm not getting into Neanderthal logic.
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
reply to post by Bone75
So then you must've applauded the hospital for this.
I don't even have to look at the link to know what you're referring to. And no, I don't applaud the hospital. That was a tragedy.
Should we also perform a genetic comparison to the fetus and then go kill the father too? He is just as responsible.
That's just silly, but genetic comparisons between fetuses and fathers is something I would whole-heartedly support.
But why aren't we doing that now?
Because that would give the father RIGHTS now wouldn't it?
edit on 15-11-2012 by Bone75 because: somehow erased the first sentence. no disrespect intended.edit on 15-11-2012 by Bone75 because: oops again. I think its fixed
It was a preventable tragedy but because they have all-or-nothing abortion laws the woman dies. Forced to carry a fetus in her that was dying because it still had a heart beat and nothing could be done for it. You don't think the same thing will occur here or other places if we adopt this kind of approach?
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog
There's no sense debating the non sensible. Anyone who believes that a female should taught her role in society based on biology, and should die for objecting to her biological fate, isn't worth another finger flick on my keyboard.
Peace out/ until a more worthy discussion comes along. Something serious. I'm not getting into Neanderthal logic.
I agree. The last page with posts saying it is okay for women to die for an abortion and that they need to learn their places/roles is beyond reproach. I would have to explain human decency and equality to even start unpacking those posts.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog
There's no sense debating the non sensible. Anyone who believes that a female should taught her role in society based on biology, and should die for objecting to her biological fate, isn't worth another finger flick on my keyboard.
Peace out/ until a more worthy discussion comes along. Something serious. I'm not getting into Neanderthal logic.
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
reply to post by Bone75
And yet you are okay with a woman dying because it isn't equal today and it wasn't equal in the decades before when it was occurring (back alley abortions)
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
What are the role of men then?
You should also know with all your sex ed classes that there is no 100% effective way to prevent pregnancy even with contraceptives. The only 100% way is abstinence. MEN are the only way to get a WOMAN pregnant so why doesn't he learn his role?
Double standard, double standard.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog
There's no sense debating the non sensible. Anyone who believes that a female should taught her role in society based on biology, and should die for objecting to her biological fate, isn't worth another finger flick on my keyboard.
Peace out/ until a more worthy discussion comes along. Something serious. I'm not getting into Neanderthal logic.
Neanderthal logic?????
You ever heard of partial birth abortions?
Yea, someone getting upset over legalized murder is real neanderthal like, I'm sure.
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Quadrivium
A fertilized egg may be a human life form, but it's hardly a human being or a person. Nor is it the beginning of life, as both the sperm and the ovum are alive and are human.
You're letting terminology get in the way of common sense. Yes, sperm is human life. Yes, the ovum is human life, but a fertilized egg is A human life.
DNA tests on all 3 can prove it if you like.edit on 15-11-2012 by Bone75 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Quadrivium
A fertilized egg may be a human life form, but it's hardly a human being or a person. Nor is it the beginning of life, as both the sperm and the ovum are alive and are human.
You're letting terminology get in the way of common sense. Yes, sperm is human life. Yes, the ovum is human life, but a fertilized egg is A human life.
DNA tests on all 3 can prove it if you like.edit on 15-11-2012 by Bone75 because: (no reason given)
Your conclusion is fundamentally Flawed. I can do a DNA test on a STRAND OF HUMAN HAIR with a FOLLICLE....and it will give me the same data that a DNA test will give me on a Cell taken from a Clump of Cells that are dividing and have implanted themselves in the Uterine Wall. The HAIR STRAND is NOT ALIVE but the Dead Hair cells will give me Living Cells still even those these Cells also have Human DNA these Cells will not have the ability to naturally grow into a Child. Point is that just because something can be tested to have Human DNA does not mean it is a Human Being
Yes carrots and cabbages are alive but they are not human.
In fact a Human Being is a collection of many Life Forms such as the Bacteria that lives inside a Humans Digestive Track as without this Bacteria existing in our Bodies Large and Small Intestines and through out the Digestive Track...a person would not be able to live. A CARROT is alive...a CABBAGE is alive...that does not mean it is SENTIENT. The same can be said for a clump of cells attached to the uterine wall. Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Quadrivium
A fertilized egg may be a human life form, but it's hardly a human being or a person. Nor is it the beginning of life, as both the sperm and the ovum are alive and are human.
You're letting terminology get in the way of common sense. Yes, sperm is human life. Yes, the ovum is human life, but a fertilized egg is A human life.
DNA tests on all 3 can prove it if you like.edit on 15-11-2012 by Bone75 because: (no reason given)
Your conclusion is fundamentally Flawed. I can do a DNA test on a STRAND OF HUMAN HAIR with a FOLLICLE....and it will give me the same data that a DNA test will give me on a Cell taken from a Clump of Cells that are dividing and have implanted themselves in the Uterine Wall. The HAIR STRAND is NOT ALIVE but the Dead Hair cells will give me Living Cells still even those these Cells also have Human DNA these Cells will not have the ability to naturally grow into a Child. Point is that just because something can be tested to have Human DNA does not mean it is a Human Being In fact a Human Being is a collection of many Life Forms such as the Bacteria that lives inside a Humans Digestive Track as without this Bacteria existing in our Bodies Large and Small Intestines and through out the Digestive Track...a person would not be able to live. A CARROT is alive...a CABBAGE is alive...that does not mean it is SENTIENT. The same can be said for a clump of cells attached to the uterine wall. Split Infinity