It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by windword
No! No!
The moment of birth, when one draws their first breath. You know, their birthday? The day that is written on that thing called a "Birth Certificate?" That is beginning of ones existence into this existence.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
It is sad to see that abortion had became the second next issue that would be critical to the presidential election, and see how such an issue had been MISUSED by both religions and politicians to divide the nation of the ignorant and the faithful to achieve their personal glory and agendas.
Mankind had been given the gift of free will by our common Creator. When a woman is pregnant, it is her free will and responsibility over the life of the child inside her.
If mankind were to create laws that take that decision and free will from her, then it will become mankind's responsibility over what happens next.
There are a variety of reasons why a female would get pregnant. We should not just simply base the reason that she was a 'loose' woman and thus resulted in such situations, for there is empirical evidence to suggest NOT so, only is the most convenient one to fool others to accept the anti abortion stance.
If a female is forced against her will, resulting in a live birth, then is mankind prepared to take FULL responsibility for the child should the mother not be able to when it imposes its will to ban abortions?
Truth is, very very seldom does mankind accepts such responsibilities, but instead DEMAND the mother to take care of her child. Worse, at times resulting in the loss of both mother and child in tragedies of life and modern living such as poverty, lack of emotional support, discrimination, etc.
Then will mankind equally be held accountable for such losses in life when it imposes its will to ban abortions?
I applaud the humans whom stalk abortion clinics and try to sway women away from abortions in lands where abortions are not banned. Such is the manner to fight abortions - peacefully through winning hearts and minds, and NOT by force.
The insignificant nobody me is FULLY, TOTALLY and ABSOLUTELY against abortions, but I will never force anyone against their free will, more so over the issue of abortions., for it takes away precious lives, a murder upon an innocent child human
RATHER, education and family orientated motivations are the way to win hearts and minds for a mother to want her child, and love him/her for life, along with society's support.
Mainstream religions and politicians must comprehend that the best laws are those that a citizen will accept and abide by on their own free will, and not by imposition, for no mortal can look beyond the heart of human, which is capable of deeds well hidden, of both good and bad.
Let the woman take FULL responsibility and free will for the child, the way EVE accepted, not from man but by our common Creator, and we mankind give her the fullest support in terms of education, motivations, goals and material needs where we can, for her to keep and love the child.
I believe in gender equality. If Men do not have a reasonable right to opt out of parenthood then neither should women. Frankly spoken, the whole "I have the uterus so I make the rules" BS is now gone.
Originally posted by GideonFaith
Some just don't realize it's not complicated. They like to make it complicated. Abortion is murder and life starts on day one of conception. See, not so hard. Some people want it to be complicated. The complicated and miracle part of it all is that human life starts when one sperm and one egg fertilize and at the end of 9 months creates a beautiful baby.
Originally posted by GideonFaith
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
reply to post by GideonFaith
It is not a baby or infant until birth.
Biologically and medically they are fetuses while still in the womb.
Baby, infant or fetuses; they are still human life.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by GideonFaith
Originally posted by MonkeyFishFrog
reply to post by GideonFaith
It is not a baby or infant until birth.
Biologically and medically they are fetuses while still in the womb.
Baby, infant or fetuses; they are still human life.
Actually no. You could state it is the beginning process of Human Life but a Fertilized Egg that is implanted itself in the Uterine Wall...is NOT a Human Being as of yet. A Fetus does not become Sentient until way down the line in it's later development.
THAT is what should be at issue. When exactly or PLUS or MINUS an amount of time...is a Fetus Sentient? Prior to this all we have is an empty Biological Shell designed to create a Sentient Being. Split Infinity
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Quadrivium
What you mean to say is that "another potential human being should not forfeit the prospect of existence over the rights of the woman to not be a mother."
I don't care what you use for justification, A fertilized egg is not a human being. It's not worth of any rights that the woman doesn't give to it herself.
Sperm is also human life, yet we kill sperm by the bazillions, with no guilt.
edit on 14-11-2012 by windword because: (no reason given)
www.prolifephysicians.org...
Furthermore, that life is unquestionably human. A human being is a member of the species homo sapiens. Human beings are products of conception, which is when a human male sperm unites with a human female oocyte (egg). When humans procreate, they don't make non-humans like slugs, monkeys, cactuses, bacteria, or any such thing. Emperically-verifiable proof is as close as your nearest abortion clinic: send a sample of an aborted fetus to a laboratory and have them test the DNA to see if its human or not. Genetically, a new human being comes into existence from the earliest moment of conception.
Originally posted by windword
While anyone can take care of a human baby, only the mother can bear her child, she can't pay someone take on her pregnancy for her. The very thought that a person resides within another person is ridiculous. A person is a sovereign individual.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by windword
Who are you to say one human life is more important than another? If you have consensual sex, don't you understand you might get pregnant? Why should another human life be taken because you made that decision?
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by windword
Who are you to say one human life is more important than another? If you have consensual sex, don't you understand you might get pregnant? Why should another human life be taken because you made that decision?
That's exactly what you're doing. You're saying that the right to life of a fertilized egg is more important than the right of the woman to exercise her own morality. You made yourself the judge.
Do you also want to force a pregnant rape victim to carry her rapist's child?
Savita Halappanavar, 31, went to University Hospital Galway with back pain on October 21 and was found to be miscarrying.
She died of septicaemia a week after being admitted, 17-weeks pregnant.
Her husband Praveen Halappanavar told the Irish Times that after days of "agony" his wife had asked for an abortion.
He said she had repeated her request over three days but was told Ireland was a Catholic country and by law nothing could be done because of the presence of a foetal hearbeat.
In 1992, when challenged in the "X-case" involving a 14-year-old rape victim, the Supreme Court ruled that abortion was permitted when the woman's life was at risk, including from suicide.
But an earlier constitutional amendment banning abortion remains in place, leaving medical professionals to navigate a legal minefield when treating pregnant women.