It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by webvida
Or maybe it was the timing of the DEMOLITION CHARGES???
www.911truth.ws...
Adjust browser size smaller to increase clarity.
Be sure to take special notice of the left side of the tower - see the charges going off before the collapse reaches them?
[edit on 20-10-2004 by webvida]
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Fact-there was no fireproofing on the structural steel above the 64th floor of either building. It was stopped due to environmental concerns during construction. (asbestos). The rapid colapse is due directly to environmentalist morons.................
Originally posted by HumptyDumpty
Originally posted by webvida
Or maybe it was the timing of the DEMOLITION CHARGES???
www.911truth.ws...
Adjust browser size smaller to increase clarity.
Be sure to take special notice of the left side of the tower - see the charges going off before the collapse reaches them?
[edit on 20-10-2004 by webvida]
I think you dont understand how the building collapsed... I belive that the "explosion" that you see is the force of the first or maybe first couple of floor collapsing (See my above post) onto the lower floors (creating that explosion you see right before the total collapse), in turn creating a chain reaction of total collapse... This is just my opinion, I havnt studied any of the "charged explosion" theorys but I also dont see any reason to. (ie: Jet Fuel, Angled Entry, Floor system as I described, The "explosion" that you describe, The melted/streatched "cleats" that were found after the collapse, the lack of fireproofing after the collapes... I could go on and on)
I dont buy this explosion thing for one min.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Fact-there was no fireproofing on the structural steel above the 64th floor of either building. It was stopped due to environmental concerns during construction. (asbestos). The rapid colapse is due directly to environmentalist morons.................
Originally posted by Djarums
Humpty, I wish I could tell you what was used instead, but I have been unable to find anything that gives a good chemical makeup of the replacement. I do, however, know for sure that some manner of fireproofing was used as New York City does have certain laws you know. DrHoracid, asbestos fireproofing was discontinued by the contractos Mario & DiBono after the FDA panic, not any and all fireproofing.
The question will always remain, as this speaker said, if asbestos had been used in the remainder of the buildings, would they have stood 4 extra hours as Levine said and allowed so many more people to get out.
~webvida
Ok I see what you mean, but howcome there was not more of these explosions as the collapse spread - that was quite a big explosion so what caused it? You would think anything that could explode like this would have done so already...
Originally posted by webvida
Ok I see what you mean, but howcome there was not more of these explosions as the collapse spread - that was quite a big explosion so what caused it? You would think anything that could explode like this would have done so already...
Also looking to left of the video you see bursts flying out the side of the building what are these? NOtice there are 3 of them just before collapse so it can't be from pressure, can it?