It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

If you were the boss in charge of your own company, who would you hire to work for you, Obama or Mit

page: 1
2
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 08:43 PM
link   
I think too many people look at the presidential election as though they are choosing their leader or their own bossman in charge. Remember the president is supposed to work for us, WE the people. We are the ones paying the taxes and the salaries of all these elected officials. If you were the boss and had to hire either Obama or Mitt to work for you, who would you select and why?
edit on 1-11-2012 by CyberTruth because: (no reason given)

edit on 1-11-2012 by CyberTruth because: (no reason given)

edit on 1-11-2012 by CyberTruth because: spelling error

edit on 1-11-2012 by CyberTruth because: spellinf

edit on 1-11-2012 by CyberTruth because: cant figure out how to edit the thread title - oh well.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 08:50 PM
link   
Comparing the Executive office to a CEO position isn't a good match-up.

But to answer your question, I would hire Mitt. But if I had to choose a President out of the two, I would choose Obama.

Running the country for a profit would have dire consequences.
edit on 1-11-2012 by UnaChispa because: Typos



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 08:51 PM
link   
What job are you thinking of? Used car salesman? Chief Financial Officer? Someone I'd be grooming to take over the business?



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 08:51 PM
link   
reply to post by CyberTruth
 


I would hire Romney.

I want someone who can lead and impose respect to lead my company and of course with business and administration experience.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 08:53 PM
link   
I would hire the person with the better qualifications for the job im hiring for.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 08:58 PM
link   
I would hire Romney for a business.
I would hire Obama for president, if a businessman was running against him.

The ONLY thing scarier than Obama being president, is a businessman being president.




You know what, scratch all I said I didn't really answer your question....



If you were the boss and had to hire either Obama or Mitt to work for you, who would you select and why?

The answer would have to be Obama. Mitt seems like a man who wouldn't listen to my orders.
edit on 1-11-2012 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:00 PM
link   
reply to post by CyberTruth
 


Depends on the business.

For a used car lot? Mittens.
For a case worker? Obama.
For a real estate agent? Mittens.
For a tour guide? Obama.
For a military recruiter? Mittens.
For a Peace Corps recruiter? Obama.
For a Walmart greeter? Mittens.
For a firm lobbying against Walmart expansion? Obama.

The business I'm actually opening is one that Mittens wouldn't want to work in, though, so I'd have to hire Obama.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cuervo
reply to post by CyberTruth
 


Depends on the business.

For a used car lot? Mittens.
For a case worker? Obama.
For a real estate agent? Mittens.
For a tour guide? Obama.
For a military recruiter? Mittens.
For a Peace Corps recruiter? Obama.
For a Walmart greeter? Mittens.
For a firm lobbying against Walmart expansion? Obama.

The business I'm actually opening is one that Mittens wouldn't want to work in, though, so I'd have to hire Obama.

For a garbage man? Obama.
For a gay strip club? Mittens.
edit on 1-11-2012 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:03 PM
link   
reply to post by UnaChispa
 


Agreed CEO and President are not exactly the same but not completely different either. The Executive Office as you have mentioned is surely called Executive Office for a reason.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cuervo
reply to post by CyberTruth
 


Depends on the business.

For a used car lot? Mittens.
For a case worker? Obama.
For a real estate agent? Mittens.
For a tour guide? Obama.
For a military recruiter? Mittens.
For a Peace Corps recruiter? Obama.
For a Walmart greeter? Mittens.
For a firm lobbying against Walmart expansion? Obama.

The business I'm actually opening is one that Mittens wouldn't want to work in, though, so I'd have to hire Obama.


Eloquently stated. You hit it right on.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:07 PM
link   
I'd keep looking.


Why are we focused on just the two of them? For a website that touts the perils of the two-party system, boy do we ever love it.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by CyberTruth
reply to post by UnaChispa
 


Agreed CEO and President are not exactly the same but not completely different either. The Executive Office as you have mentioned is surely called Executive Office for a reason.


And what reason is that?



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:09 PM
link   
Which Romney?

Liberal Governor of Massachusetts Romney?

Ultra Conservative Republican Primary Candidate Romney?

Moderate Presidential Candidate Romney?


I'd have to know which personality I was dealing with first.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:10 PM
link   
reply to post by CyberTruth
 


With these two choices,I would place an ad in the paper
accepting applications for help.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by eNumbra
I'd keep looking.


Why are we focused on just the two of them? For a website that touts the perils of the two-party system, boy do we ever love it.


Sometimes when your hiring you have to choose amongst available applicants unfortunately.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:11 PM
link   
Obama, because he is a follower, not a leader.
2nd



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by CyberTruth

Originally posted by eNumbra
I'd keep looking.


Why are we focused on just the two of them? For a website that touts the perils of the two-party system, boy do we ever love it.


Sometimes when your hiring you have to choose amongst available applicants unfortunately.

You do realize there's always more than two available applicants right?



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:13 PM
link   
I wouldn't hire either of them, all they would do is sit around and BS all day. I doubt if either of them has done any hard real work in their life that lasted more than a day or two.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:13 PM
link   
reply to post by CyberTruth
 


Neitherthey'd want too much money, I want to pay under the table, and below minimum wage. Was this a serious question, because I would hire an illegal to work for me they are more dependable and don't ask for a lot of money.



posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 09:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by mamabeth
reply to post by CyberTruth
 


With these two choices,I would place an ad in the paper
accepting applications for help.


Unfortunately not an option however you could move to another country all together. That's seems the only real 3rd choice available.



new topics

top topics



 
2
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join