Without watching the film, I can see right away that this will be an extreme exercise in intellectual laziness. Such "inside job" claims
universally have to be, since for them to promote their claims they need to sweep a lot of inconvenient facts under the rug so than noone can see
are you serious
The 'truth' movement is about asking questions and demanding answers of the official hypothesized claims...what does one need, ASKING
for the evidential support of the 'already' in-place claims, that ARE
the official story?
anything else is basically nonsense thrown in by..."shills"...purposely here to...'muddy' the water...
-The US governnemt showed the classified intelligence proving the 9/11 attack was staged by Islamic terrorists to our NATO allies,
[shakes head]...dude....NIST scientific investigation that was bestowed by an Act of Congress to find out how and why three buildings fell on 9-11,
found the planes they 'flew" caused minimal localized asymmetrical damage to each tower, 14.5%, leaving 240 intact fireproofed vertical support
remaining....so technically, the "staged Islamic terrorists" failed!
NIST also couldn't find any WTC steel that did fail from the fires present to cause the collapse of all three buildings as officially HYPOTHESIZED
The scientific investigation did not check for explosives and accelerants, yet years later, they watch less than 30 seconds of youtube video's,
say...'NO big BOOMS there" then officially claim that "NO explosives or accelerants were used.....lol...the entire day by watching less than 30
seconds of video????