posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 10:01 PM
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
So a "rapid response" team is many many hours away?
Yes according to reports.
How is that rapid response?
That is the designation they hold. Kind of like Delta. Are you aware of the closest base?
They had drones overhead, all indications are they knew exactly what was going on, can you cite this confusion?
A armed drone was on scene two and a half hours after the first report came in it was then relieved by another unarmed drone over four hours later.
If you are watching in real time and you see what is happening how would a cable cause confusion?
The first cable stated they were under attack and people were missing hours later another cable came in stating the attack was over. The only picture
you have is from a drone with smoke from buildings interfering and communications were cutting in and out.
If you are a police officer and get a report of a burglar and you have access to security feeds and you can see the man is still in the house in real
time would you accept a report from a neighbor saying he thinks the guy left
This is a logical fallacy argument that I will overlook and play along a little. In this scenario is the house on fire where smoke is blinding most of
the camera views?
Have you forgotten that drones cannot see through smoke from burning buildings.
Two and a half hours means the Americans are alive today, nothing at all means they are dead. Nothing was done. Americans died.
So has it been released at what time they died or is this speculation?
I believe there were also assets closer which requested to engage and were denied.
This is still up for debate and has not been confirmed by reliable sources.
I believe two CIA officers went anyways and lost their lives. The response was completely inadequate.
They were providing intel which may have been part of the conflicting reports.
There is also a great deal of confusion over what happened because the administration intentionally created confusion for weeks rather than release
Yes there is confusion now and there was confusion at the time of the attack the two should be separate issues because one is dealing with the
administration and the other will be essential in determining if the right calls were made.
It is actualy their intentional hiding of facts and trying to blame a video and a spontaneous riot for their ineptitude that truly is what disturbs me
This is what has been pushed in the media but have you given any consideration that this is what their intel was telling them at the time
especially considering the demonstrations that broke out across the world?
What has disturbed me the most is the politicizing of this event and the disinformation, and opinions perpetrated as fact that the media has been
releasing. I want a timeline and the truth and everything that has been put out there to distort and invoke public outcry (which is working) is only
making it harder to discern what actually happened.
The information I provided is confirmed information and it has been hard to come by.
edit on 1-11-2012 by Grimpachi because: spelling