Left sees Sandy as an opportunity to push for bigger government , page 2

Pages: << 1 2 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times

reply posted on 31-10-2012 @ 03:33 PM by beezzer

reply to post by BritofTexas

You get unprecidented deficits by spending too much.

And if the numbers are correct, then attacking the source is. . . . . .

reply posted on 31-10-2012 @ 03:39 PM by BritofTexas

reply to post by beezzer

You also get unprecidented deficits by not raising revenue.

And if the numbers are correct from Heritage Foundation then I would be ...

reply posted on 31-10-2012 @ 03:44 PM by beezzer

Originally posted by BritofTexas
reply to post by beezzer

You also get unprecidented deficits by not raising revenue.

That's called, "spending money you don;t have" AKA "fiscal irresponsibility" AKA "Stupid money management" AKA See past 4 years of Obama.

And if the numbers are correct from Heritage Foundation then I would be ...

Get ready to

then. Not

nor

when Obama loses

many will be

reply posted on 31-10-2012 @ 03:49 PM by darkhorserider

reply to post by beezzer

Obama is not going to lose, and even if he does, nothing will change. Romney has already slid from "The first thing I will do is repeal Obamacare," to "well, I'll keep the good parts."

The only loser in this election is the American People, but I'll put my bettin cash on Obama, and I really expect to see it as a 5 point victory or higher! I think Obama wins this thing 51-46-4, with the 4 going heavily to Gary Johnson, plus the write-ins, and other 3rd party candidates. (yes, I know that is 101, but I didn't want to put 50.5 to 45.5 to 4, LOL!) Really, I'm afraid the electoral vote might be even more lopsided in Obama's favor, because some key battleground states Obama might just barely slip by Romney and it will skew the overall results. I think he takes the popular vote by 5 points, but I think he wins even bigger in the electoral college.

edit on 31-10-2012 by darkhorserider because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 31-10-2012 @ 03:54 PM by BritofTexas

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by BritofTexas
reply to post by beezzer

You also get unprecidented deficits by not raising revenue.

That's called, "spending money you don;t have" AKA "fiscal irresponsibility" AKA "Stupid money management" AKA See past 4 years of Obama.

No. That's called not raising revenues on those who have had a free ride and caused the latest recession.

And if the numbers are correct from Heritage Foundation then I would be ...

Get ready to then. Not nor when Obama loses many will be

One of us certainly will. It's far to close for me to make predictions. But a sick, twisted part of me is going to miss all this hare pulling nonsense in the political forums.

edit on 31-10-2012 by BritofTexas because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 31-10-2012 @ 03:58 PM by beezzer

reply to post by BritofTexas

It's about over, my friend. Afterwards, we can share a bottle of single malt and BOTH berate the Nirubu crowd!

reply posted on 31-10-2012 @ 04:03 PM by BritofTexas

reply to post by beezzer

SINGLE MALT!!!

You have just leaped even higher in my esteem.

I look forward to it greatly.

reply posted on 31-10-2012 @ 05:02 PM by hp1229

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by BritofTexas

It's about over, my friend. Afterwards, we can share a bottle of single malt and BOTH berate the Nirubu crowd!

Gosh I love single malt