reply to post by JiggyPotamus
While I'm all for new research, new theories, new hypothesis, etc, I'm afraid you have hit the nail on the head here.
This Pane Andov presents his article, not as a scientific exploration and proposal article, but spends a lot of time suggesting NASA cover ups and
conspiracies. Worse, several things in his article he presents as fact that are wrong. Here's a few of them:
From the article:
Today we know that super massive Black Holes are spinning at unbelievably high rates due to their overwhelming mass. At this high rate of spin,
the Black Hole's projected gravitational field is no longer sphereical but rather flattens out to form a massive yet extremely thin spinng
This statement right here shows me that he does not actually have an understanding in physics or astrophysics, let alone "advanced knowledge" in
The disks that we see in the images provided in the articles is actually the
of mater around a black hole:
Due to conservation of angular momentum, gas falling into the gravitational well created by a massive object will typically form a disc-like
structure around the object.
Then he goes on to state this:
Another important thing that we need to know about super massive black holes is that they go through cycles that last for many thousands of years
and at the end of each cycle they explode and from the point of sigularity they release powerful and for human kind still unknown form of
There is no evidence to support that Supermassive Black Holes
go through cycles that
last for many thousands of years and explode.
I have a feeling that he is trying to suggest that this is what the source of Gamma Ray Burts
Then it get's worse in his article, he then says this:
It is so powerful that it affects the DNA of Life, the whole energetic makeup of the galaxy and usually stretches to the very distant corners of
the galaxy and beyond. It is completely intelligent and like the point of Sigularity possesses unusual properties. In other words we can see it as a
scanning program of the Cosmic Designer Himself, powerful enough to upgrade the DNA and manifest evolution to species and the other way
So at first he says that this "energy" is unknown, then goes on to say exactly what it is and what it does.....that is a direct contradiction.
Worse, he is saying that it is "intelligently controlled", and that all DNA on this planet is changed every few thousands of years.
From what I understand, Evolution takes a wee bit longer than thousands of years.
Energy that does get released from Supermassive Black Holes, like Relativistic
leave perpendicular to the accretion disks, and do not spread out parallel to it, and out into the galaxy.
There is a lot more I could ping on, but I'm limited to how long this post is, so I'll pick two other things:
Once this energy makes physical contact with the surface of the Sun it will change the rate of how our star is spending its fuel.
This is not true, as he is basing it on the temperature of the recently discovered gas cloud that our solar system is entering heating up our sun.
That is not how nuclear fusion
works. You need more than high
temperatures. You need more mass. That is how the Sun's Core
works, and it's temperature is 15 times hotter than this cloud we
are entering. As a mater of fact, the temperature of this cloud is not near enough to cause fusion, or increase it in any way.
If you want to increase the sun's rate of nuclear fusion so that it will fuse it's hydrogen faster, then you need ot increase it's mass.
By a LOT. And when I say by a LOT I mean you would need to change the sun in to a Supergiant
life spans are measured in 10's of millions of years, instead of billions of years like smaller stars. So we'd have to make the sun at least 10
times more massive than it is now.
He also barely mentions the Heliosphere
and with good reason, since it helps protect us from many
things out there......like million degree clouds, and cosmic energy.
Again, while I believe we should stretch our minds, and consider what might be impossible sometimes (as that is how we progress and advance), I don't
think that was Mr. Pane Andov's intention. His entire article reads instead like many other "Doomsday" articles out there. His paper is not
science. It's sensationalism.