posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 07:50 PM
This is very disturbing news...and, if true, the implications are disturbing.
We already know that no other planes were sent to defend the Benghazi consulate during the seven hour attack...and we were also told that there were
two drones witnessing the attack in real time.
Now, we discover that the first drone was pulled off observation of terrorist training camps in the area and re-tasked over the consulate...and
unarmed...while the second drone was launched from Sigonella DURING the attack...and was sent UNARMED.
We now know that ex-SEAL Tyrone Woods was actively engaged in 'painting' terrorist mortar positions around the consulate with laser...and that by
risking his life in so doing, Woods also was giving away his position to the enemy which ultimately resulted in his death.
So, if we know that no other planes were sent...and the only drones in the air were BOTH unarmed, then WHY was Tyrone Woods painting targets?
Could he have been LIED to and told that planes were on the way or already over head? In essence, was he being 'set up' by his own government?
Fox News reports that, according to senior military officials, the predator drones flying above Benghazi during the attacks on our consulate were
unarmed. This is the question on which Chris Wallace pressed Democratic Senator Mark Warner over the weekend, to no avail. Correspondent Jennifer
Griffin notes that one of the two drones came from Darnah, a city in eastern Libya; the other took off from Sigonella, Italy, to provide backup once
attack was already underway. So why was it unarmed? The Fox report does not provide an answer.