Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Bigfoot does exist, claim scientists

page: 6
88
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 12:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Variable
reply to post by Dishonored
 


Yea, i have to agree. Don't you love that show where they are out in the woods yelling and whooping and then they here something and look all serious and say " We have a Squatch!." No, you have a drunk redneck whooping back (especially if they know some out-of-towners are out looking for a "Squatch"


It would be really neat, but guys and gals, there is no such thing as the Sasquatch in America. Many would have been shot by now. I could see something staying alive in remote Siberia or Alaska for a bit, but even there you have people everywhere and they are armed. No bones from dead ones, no nothing. Unfortunately, we have lots of humans who want to pretend to be a Sasquatch and really get a laugh out of it. We also have a lot of people who see what they want to see. There are no Mermaids, Unicorns or Dragons either. Sorry. If you want to put your "Hope" for something, vote for Obama...




V



Well there could have been dragons at one point considering this planet was dominated by giant reptiles, but since there's no 50 foot reptiles in the sky to speak of, I'd say they're all gone by now. But yes, if there was a big foot in North America I'm sure at some point during hunting season we would've found it by now... especially with Darth Chaney running around out there.
edit on 31-10-2012 by Dishonored because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 12:10 PM
link   
reply to post by truthseeker1984
 

My Grandpa told me, when I was a kid, that Bigfoot ate their dead, bones and all. He said a couple would breed, producing multiple offspring, often. they would allow some young to grow up and eventually replace them, keeping the overall small population size the same. The rest of the young ones would just be fattened up a little, then killed and eaten.

Grandpa's stories always seemed to work out to be true, so I naturally believed him as a kid......



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 12:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jalmo
reply to post by truthseeker1984
 

My Grandpa told me, when I was a kid, that Bigfoot ate their dead, bones and all. He said a couple would breed, producing multiple offspring, often. they would allow some young to grow up and eventually replace them, keeping the overall small population size the same. The rest of the young ones would just be fattened up a little, then killed and eaten.

Grandpa's stories always seemed to work out to be true, so I naturally believed him as a kid......


Grandpa seems to have gotten into the wine cabinet a bit too often.



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 12:12 PM
link   
There's no question some will stomp and snort at this reference but say what you might about Lloyd Pye he comes up with some very interesting things for his lectures. It's a slam dunk that academia is in a state of almost arrested development when it comes to changing its views on the "official" story of evolution. Darwinism, in my opinion is as far off the mark as Creationism is.

This is Pye's main talk on YouTube: www.youtube.com... His account of the various types of Big Foot animals out there gives the number as 5 if I remember correctly. The account of the Alma from back in the mid-1800's and her hybrid children is particularly interesting. Throw in his account of the Star Child skull from Mexico and you have a need to completely rewrite the history of humanity from the ground up. There's too much politics and idiotic "correctness" going around for truth to survive very long. Too many careers depend on the current deception.



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 12:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Ollie769
 


Ahhh Yes .... Loyd is who I was referring to on my last post (page before this one)

If you listen to what he has to say, he has a ton of knowledge on evolution and the like. He's very practical and reasonable.

I like how he calls out mainstream scientists on the bs contradictions and the theories that they push off as fact.




Too many careers depend on the current deception.


^ That, is an understatement. Well said.
edit on 31-10-2012 by dplum517 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   
Absolutely zero fossil records or recent carcasses found. Bigfoots eats their dead? Not even small bone fragments have been found. Teeth or jaw bones? Nope. Fingernail or femur? Nada.

I'd say there may be a slight chance something dwells the Himalayas or the Alps....but, for the most part, I ain't buying it.

And yes, the "Finding Bigfoot" TV show is a total clown show. The main guy comes to some ridiculous conclusions in every episode. I watch it for laughs. "Broken branch? There is definitely squatch roaming here tonight!!"



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by BigFrigginAl
 


If spelling and grammar are any indication ... this article is a hoax.



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 01:29 PM
link   
All the Dinosaur fossils that have been found and not one bone from Sasquatch? = Doesn't exist.

They eat their dead, Bones and all? Yeah right. Surely many would have perished from an accident in the bush, drowning, a slip off a cliff or by being attacked and killed by wild animals? Maybe even a few were banished from the tribe for not contributing or raping other Bigfoots?

Atleast in North America, once they murdered most of the Grizzly, they needed a new boogeyman. It's nonsense. ~$heopleNation



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 01:44 PM
link   
Moscow, St Petersburg at Idaho?

What? There is no such place. There is the University of Idaho in Moscow and where a professor there studies Big Foots (Feet whatever)



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 02:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Dishonored
 


Didn't check pages 2 and on to see if anyone threw this in, but the 911 call recorded here seems legit in terms of the 'anxiety' of the caller, though what he saw could be anything; but. the region gives some credence to it being BF:




If someone else already posted this, feel free to send me a nasty U2U...





posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Jalmo
 


did " grandpa " tell you santa was real ?



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 03:00 PM
link   
The lack of remains is a legitimate question. I'll have to go back through Pye's talk to see if he addresses that as I don't recall it being talked about. One thing I HAVE heard, however, is that in the event of a BF "family member" dying they tend to bury their dead often under large rocks. You can imagine what a couple of 800lb males and a few 600lb females could move to cover a body. While we humans have been making considerable inroads into their back country areas those areas such as the PNW are still pretty much impenatrable to most of us. Given the few examples of each species of BF out there that leaves remains, that obviously HAVE to exist, scattered very widely and well hidden. This country still harbors quite a few mysteries out there that aren't just going to fall into your lap!

There was an account that Pye talked about regarding a juvenile BF that was shot back in the late 60's and the guy kept it in a freezer for years. He trotted it around to fares and sold tickets to see it and did, I believe, allow samples to be taken for analysis. What happened to that "specimen" I don't know and neither did Pye but everyone from the Smithsonian to big universities to the military have been known to hide things that have the potential to upset their apple cart. In this case, however, I'd have to say this is a highly sensitive population that probably does deserve the protection of denial of its existance. I don't think they would assemilate very well into our society. Talk about Planet of the Apes on steroids!

As far as the bilge that takes up time on the History channel I don't waste my time with it at all. Ghosts, monsters and UFOs simply don't appear when you say "lights, camera, action!" Those guys belong on the various channels trying to sell you all the cheap widgets. I'll give the T.A.P.S. people a pass, though. Unless they outright faked some things those lighthouse gigs have turned up some truly hair raising experiences.
edit on 31-10-2012 by Ollie769 because: added more info.



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 03:16 PM
link   
It would be silly to conclude that Bigfoot could not possibly exist because no animal fitting its description has yet been discovered, displayed in zoos or museums or featured in National Geographic specials.

The annals of science are rife with examples of the discovery of species thought to either be extinct or mythical. An obvious example is the discovery of gorillas, which were thought to be purely the product of native lore and superstition.

There ARE fossilized remains of animals that could actually be Bigfoot. A likely suspect is Gigantopithecus, thought to be long extinct.

The fact that no remains have been stumbled upon by hunters means little. You never find remains of bears, for example, largely because of predation.

At the same time, some of the eyewitness testimony has been pretty compelling, particularly among people who live in the Pacific Northwest and in Alaska.

The dense forests of the northern United States, Canada and Alaska are huge and vast and largely unexplored.

I agree that Finding Bigfoot is a goofy program. This, however, has little bearing on whether Bigfoot exists.

I suspect that most of the cynics giving voice here have neglected to read anything about this subject, nor have they spent any time thinking objectively about it.



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 03:32 PM
link   
reply to post by BigFrigginAl
 


you know what! check this video i uploaded quite a while ago!

It's from a video game, but it has to make you wonder sometimes!

Area-51 from Midway in 2005 starring David Duchovny and Marlyn Manson.

they mention in the secret files about the bigfoot being a Phase 2 Muttated infected human the escaped from the labs and was recaptured a while later, he was seen meanwhile and the legend,myth started from there.

A phase 4 muttated human end up like the Theta!

just look at the first parts of the video it starts with the bigfoot related files.

put it in 720p Full screen and hit spacebar to pause/resume video. (you need to click in the screen at least once before.)

youtu.be...
edit on 31-10-2012 by fight back because: syntax



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 03:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by SheopleNation
All the Dinosaur fossils that have been found and not one bone from Sasquatch? = Doesn't exist.


Because of their natural habbitat, the unlikelyhood that chimp fossils would be found is really low. So low, that we didn't find the first one till 2005.



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 03:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Rockpuck
 


grammar is a tool of deception! Even the DARPA use grammar errors in their official classified documents to make it easier to debunk them if they ever get leaked!

" oh you have grammar error, then it must be a hoax!!! Oh and your date stamp is wrong!!! Think beyond the Apex!"



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by BrianG
I just wonder how many are left

They are running out of places to hide


Just as many as 25 years ago... zero. Bwaha j/k.

Accept my apology gift:

Paranormal Witness is on Netflix Instant at the moment, FYI. The best stories I've seen on it (the show is well done):

From Season 1:

1 1-01 07/Sep/11 The Lost Girl
2 1-02 14/Sep/11 Kentucky UFO Chase
5 1-05 05/Oct/11 Trumbull County UFO



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 03:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by BigFrigginAl

Bigfoot does exist, claim scientists




(NEWS.com.au) — DNA tests on hair found supposedly found in a Siberian may actually prove the existence of the Abominable Snowman.

Three separate DNA tests of the hair reported it “came from a human-like creature which is not a Homosapien yet is more closely related to man than a monkey”.



Is this Loyd Pye's Hominid? It's not just Loyd Pye but LOTS of people believe these creatures are in fact Hominids.

Hominids are exactly described as more human like distant relatives of apes.

Lets see if these people try to win that 10 million dollar prize someone is offering.. ( i forget who)



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by ubeenhad

Originally posted by SheopleNation
All the Dinosaur fossils that have been found and not one bone from Sasquatch? = Doesn't exist.


Because of their natural habbitat, the unlikelyhood that chimp fossils would be found is really low. So low, that we didn't find the first one till 2005.


Saw a video once about why we don't find remains of creatures all over the woods. It was a time lapse for two weeks. The animal i believe was a deer. In two weeks all traces of the animal was gone. Decomposed, eaten by animals and insects, and the bones were either eaten or carried away.

If Bigfoot are indeed hominids, as many believe we do have tons of fossils from those. but you cant make the connection that this hominid was walking on the earth as a bigfoot from a fossil.
edit on 31-10-2012 by JohnPhoenix because: sp



posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 04:30 PM
link   
Thhink the first gorilla bones were found in 1902 and first actuall sighting much later. The Darwin moth was first caught on film in 2008 I believe.

www.cryptomundo.com...

I think the tv show deCoded touched on the fact that many people disappear in some part of Alaska, maybe there is a wormhole that big foots , cave men wonder into.. If it was true and known i think it would be attempted to keep it in control and silent.






top topics



 
88
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join