It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by CLPrime
If photons have momentum, does that mean they accelerate?
PS, thanks for the answer.
Photons do not accelerate. They have a set speed and they begin and start at that speed (only the medium they travel through alters it). Their behavior is counterintuitive in fact. Imagine for a minute you are on a train going 30mph and throw a baseball 10mph. The ball will be going 40mph correct? So what happens when you shine your flashlight? It should go the speed of light + 30mph like the ball right? Seems like we just found a way to break the speed of light! Only it doesn't. The speed of the train does not impact the speed the light goes. So if you had a train going 5 mph less than the speed of light and you turned the flashlight on, the light coming out would appear to only be going 5mph! Kind of mindblowing.
As others have pointed out, photons have no rest mass.edit on 31-10-2012 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)
Now THAT is a brilliant concept!
Originally posted by CLPrime
reply to post by chr0naut
It depends what's meant by "collects." Any material "collects" photons to some extent when electrons in the material absorb them. When this happens, the material does gain mass. That's the exact opposite of what happens when a flashlight converts electricity to photons that are then released, causing a reduction in the mass of the flashlight.
Originally posted by Moduli
Originally posted by CLPrimeMy implication was that "relativistic mass" is illusory.
It's not "illusory" it's false. It's like trying to "simplify" an explanation of a disease by describing it as an imbalance of humors. It's indefensibly wrong.
Originally posted by CLPrime
reply to post by chr0naut
Apparently, I need to remove "relativistic mass" from my vocabulary. Am I the only only who understands that this "mass" is not truly mass but a colloquial way of referring to the momentum gained by a photon (and any other object at or approaching the speed of light)? I even said so in my original post in this thread.
Need I mention again that I was leading to the complete form of "E=mc^2"? My mistake was I didn't anticipate being hijacked. In my second post, I wrote out the process of getting from standard momentum to photon momentum through E=mc^2, giving p = E/c. This is the second half of the equation, rearranged. Had I been allowed to follow this through, I was fully intending to put the two together and make it clear that photons have momentum but no mass.
So yes, you're right, photons have no mass, ever. I never said they did.
The post of mine that you're quoting is dealing with the absorption of photons by a material. When that happens, the material does gain mass, as the photons have added energy to electrons in the material.
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Has anyone seen those little rotating thingys inside what looks like a lightbulb? They have 4 little...reflecters?...that spin around when they are hit by light. One side of each reflecter is white and the other side is black. I always assumed it was light that caused them to spin but the fluffy ones question now causes me to doubt that, so what dDOES make them spin?