It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Druid42
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Ok, let's not get our panties in a bunch quite yet. The UN has no authority over your ISP. Your ISP is a business just like any other business, and pays it's taxes just like anyone else.
The US Congress would have to pass a bill to regulate ISPs. Ok, we watch for those, like SOPA, and fight tooth and nail at the local level to make sure those bills don't get passed.
I'm one of those from the pre-interweb days. I'm 44. All we had back then were BBSs to dial-up into at 300 bytes per second. So calm down.
Technology evolves, and so does the software. Remember Kazaa? It was file sharing software, and they took it down, but 20 other file sharing systems took it's place. Open source software tends to change to meet the need, unlike commercial software which changes to meet the demand.
The point?
We are going to see an evolution in our web browsers, and in the ways we surf the internet, brought about by open source products, made by the people, for the people, who care not to be monitored.
This monitoring crap wasn't an issue in the early days, heck, they were just trying to make a set of RFCs that everyone could comply with, and standardize everything. Well, that's done, and now we are faced with considerations that weren't present at the beginning, and now, our computers and broadbands are fast enough to step up to the next level. We'll see software that gives us our privacy become standard.
Unless, of course, they pass a law that makes, for example, "Firefox 23 with encryption" illegal.
And they simply can't go that far.
Originally posted by GaiusMarius
I guess there is no sense on focusing on the American Government. It would be more constructive and more inviting if we went after the UN.
We can all agree that the UN is an enemy of the people of the world. Those that are not aware can be convinced and nobody should be offended because most western nations throw a fair amount in so we all have responsibilty.
I think we are all sick of living in Bizarro World where good is bad and bad is good.
edit on 30-10-2012 by GaiusMarius because: (no reason given)
49. There is currently no comprehensive United Nations treaty on terrorism that is
applicable to an exhaustive list of the manifestations of terrorism. Similarly, the international
community has yet to agree on an internationally binding definition of the
term “terrorism”, owing largely to the difficulty of devising a universally acceptable
legal categorization for acts of violence committed by States, by armed groups such as
liberation or self-determination movements or by individuals.
~ THE USE OF THE INTERNET FOR TERRORIST PURPOSES, pg 18
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Originally posted by XLR8R
I will not compromise my freedom for safety...phuk the UN.
And thehorsehorus they rode in on...
The UN claims that terrorists are utilizing social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to spread what they call “propaganda.”
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
No American cares what the UN thinks. That's like me saying I want world internet surveillance - not going to happen.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
No American cares what the UN thinks. That's like me saying I want world internet surveillance - not going to happen.
I understand that most Americans don't care what the UN thinks, but they should care that the UN and the US are actively pursuing similar agendas on internet issues and this is a global concern, not just American.
I believe the fact that all these nations and organizations are working together towards a common goal of controlling the internet under the disguise of protecting us from terrorists should concern Americans and everyone throughout the world.