Vatican Library, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 13-3-2005 @ 04:12 PM by Nygdan
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
Only if you think all of Italy is supposed to be holy

Since the statues under consideration are not thought to be holy then it is an apt analogy. Christianity and Judaism doesn't require that another cultures icons and idols be destroyed. It merely requires that they not be worshipped as icons and idols.
But we can be sure they were erected to commemorate the gods of Egypt.

Its probable that some of those statues were infact worshipped as idols, but certainly not every statue of a god is worshipped as such. But yes, for the purposes of discussion, these things are indeed 'idols'yes, I see the point. Regardless, they are not worshipped as idols and the vatican doesn't have to destroy them any more than a christian can't go to a museum that has other idols.
has not defended the first commandment of this faith.

It worships no other god but god. The commandment is held.
And for your information, they are artifacts that were removed from Egypt by Roman conquerors which had nothing to do with preservation

And they came into the posession of the vatican and the vatican has preserved them thru time.
Does your government keep secrets from you, secrets that you will never learn?

Undoubtedly. But that hardly means that I can make up what those secrets are and be rationally justified.

bobdylan
Lest we forget that it is within a religions interest to hide and supress anything that disagrees with their version of history

Its in their interests to destroy it, not to diligently preserve it for millenia.


reply posted on 15-3-2005 @ 02:49 PM by 0951
Ok, try this one - I'm far from a theologian (indeed, I am entirely, and happily bereft of faith), so it might be complete rubbish. I should also say at the start, that the whole thing relies entirely upon two assumptions, and a failure of either throws the whole idea into the bin. Anyway, here goes. ...

(Assumption one).
That it actually exists - but if so, then:

It contains the fifth seal referred to in Revelations 6:9, and that once opened, it begins the final stage, of The End of Days.

Revelations says:

"6:9 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been killed for the Word of God, and for the testimony of the Lamb which they had.

6:10 They cried with a loud voice, saying, "How long, Master, the holy and true, until you judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?"

6:11 A long white robe was given to each of them. They were told that they should rest yet for a while, until their fellow servants and their brothers, who would also be killed even as they were, should complete their course."

(Assumption two).
If we accept the interpretation that the first four seals are describing a time when man is in a state before the rapture, where we have already been too long beset by tyranny, war, famine and death (as signified by the 'four horsemen'), and that time is 'now', then the fifth seal is the one where we ask for intercession and judgement, in effect we commission the rapture at this point, and so doing bring about the apocalypse.

2010 was chosen as the phrase "rest for a while" in 6:11 relates to a period of two years, which would tie in rather nicely with the "Mayan 2012 - end of the world" theorists too (or is that err, just a bit too glib ? ).

Random theory aside and if it's even partly true: By going on the period in which it was said to have been sealed, and the mention of the Cathars I'd suggest it contains something that would have caused significant controversy and diplomatic damage to the Catholic Church: the impact of which would only have been risk managed down to an acceptable level, by the simple expedient of the passing of time - maybe something unwelcome that brought about the end of the Cathars and began the end of the Templar movement ? Something related to the Cult of the Black Madonna maybe ?

It is intriguing nevertheless ...


reply posted on 15-3-2005 @ 03:30 PM by SomewhereinBetween
Originally posted by Nygdan
Its probable that some of those statues were infact worshipped as idols, but certainly not every statue of a god is worshipped as such. But yes, for the purposes of discussion, these things are indeed 'idols'yes, I see the point. Regardless, they are not worshipped as idols and the vatican doesn't have to destroy them any more than a christian can't go to a museum that has other idols.

has not defended the first commandment of this faith.

It worships no other god but god. The commandment is held.
The RCC declared all religious teachings, doctrines or writings not in accordance with their Canon to be heresies, and strictly forbade their dissemination in any fashion. Hence, since they are blasphemous, so too would everything else relating to them, including idols. But these Egyptian icons are being displayed in what the RCC considers to be their holy city.

Obviously, the RCC itself upholds the religious aspect of artistic renderings of its icons to drive the point home to the following that those depicted in same are real, otherwise they would have no reason to sanction and promulgate the saints, angels, Jesus, Mary and God as evidence of the religion. If you agree with that statement, Nygdan, then you must also agree that the iconography of other religions is because they are real, and for the RCC to display these other deities in any of its properties, is to assign the reality of those deities as well. Do you agree with all of this, Nygdan?

Now if you respond , I would like you to focus on the points I have stated, particularly the above paragraph, and not go off on a tangent.



[edit on 3/15/05 by SomewhereinBetween]


reply posted on 5-4-2005 @ 12:31 AM by kalki
Originally posted by FallenFromTheTree

Just in case you'd like to pay them a visit.........

www.vatican.va...

From what I understand, qualified scholars may view certain texts as long as they have
pre arranged which text they are looking for.

Browsing is not permitted and there are books and artifacts that are strictly forbidden
for anyone to view.

Why on earth would any "library" deny a qualified scholar access to a book?

This is inexcusable!


thanks for the link
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why are these 10 figures just like Jesus Christ??
  Posted 7 days ago with 14 member flags
I am an imposter in Church
  Posted 6 days ago with 11 member flags
What Kind of Christianity Is This?
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Great Flood Was Caused By A Comet?
  Posted 13 days ago with 7 member flags
Advert claiming cure through prayer is banned
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
The real Jewish people. Torah Jews Against ZIONISM
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
The World Is in Desperate Need of Heretics!
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags