It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by adjensen
It's one thing to send the Archbishop of Canterbury round, but who do you send to "represent" atheists? Dawkins? A lot of atheists I know really dislike him.
The chances of each of us coming into existence are infinitesimally small, and even though we shall all die some day, we should count ourselves fantastically lucky to get our decades in the sun.
-Dawkins
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Originally posted by adjensen
It's one thing to send the Archbishop of Canterbury round, but who do you send to "represent" atheists? Dawkins? A lot of atheists I know really dislike him.
LOL. Dawkins is the most rational atheist there is. If you can't find beauty or belief in his view of the universe then your a duck. So unless your a duck, go read what he actually believes.
I support the presence of religious figure-heads at these services and think that room should be made for the humanists too. It's just about respecting the dead in terms the dead would have appreciated.
What beliefs? Every time I try to bring up beliefs around an atheist, there is a resounding shout of "it's a lack of belief" and every time I try to suggest that there is something more than that, there is a resounding shout of "there is nothing more to atheism than a lack of belief".
It's one thing to send the Archbishop of Canterbury round, but who do you send to "represent" atheists? Dawkins? A lot of atheists I know really dislike him.
Williams: “You I think, Richard, believe you have a disproof of god.”
Dawkins: No, I don’t! you were wrong when you said that. I constructed in The God Delusion a 7-point scale, of which ’1′ was, ‘I know god exists’, ’7′ was ‘I know god doesn’t exist’ and I called myself a ’6′.
Williams: “Why don’t you call yourself an agnostic then?”
Dawkins: “I do. But I think it’s-”
Williams: “You are described as the world’s most famous atheist-”
Dawkins, “Well not by me. Um..
[laughter]
Williams: “Can I ask you to spell out your argument, your Boeing-”
Dawkins: “I’m a 6.9.”
[laughter]
Williams: “But you have your Boeing 747 argument-”
Dawkins: “Yes, I mean-”
Williams: “-to show that this tiny probability-”
Dawkins: “I believe that when you talk about agnosticism, It’s very important to make a distinction between ‘I don’t know whether X is true or not, therefore it’s 50-50 likely or unlikely’ and that’s the kind of agnostic which I don’t-which I’m definitely not. I think one can place estimates of probability on these things and I think the probability of any supernatural creator existing is very very low. So I’m-let’s say I’m a 6.9.
They are not equal. They are not faiths. Besides, who would represent the atheists? It’s a silly notion is just another attempt to erode religious faith.
Originally posted by Cuervo
reply to post by Kandinsky
What I find ironic is that Christians will often say that Atheism is a faith in itself and Atheists will say it's absolutely not a faith. Yet now religious people are saying that Atheism can't be represented as a faith and the Atheists are crying foul.
It seems that religious people and atheists all like to define "faith" as a transient concept to fit their current goals.
They, of course, should have representation but I just thought I should point out the inconsistency of the arguments.
Originally posted by wildtimes
I don't know if there's a similar org in the USA, but it's absolutely true.
If a person chooses atheism for that reason, or similar ones, then I cannot see how representation at a remembrance service is going to honour them! Surely it would be a travesty to them?
But his sentiment must be shared amongst some of those who have given their lives. It concerns me that those views might not be honoured, and all out of some effort to be politically correct! I imagine you must have a closer connection to the atheist view point, and therefore must be better informed about general opinion on the matter.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by TrueBrit
Thanks for your post, it was well-expressed.
If a person chooses atheism for that reason, or similar ones, then I cannot see how representation at a remembrance service is going to honour them! Surely it would be a travesty to them?
According to the article and links, they prefer the term of humanist rather than atheist. I do too as atheism (deserved or not) has garnered a reputation of being opposed to religion.