It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by schuyler
I agree that it might be a built-in quality that makes this impossible. That's where I have to come clean myself and say I have faith that it is explainable.
You said that "cosmologists have to infer the existence of dark matter to account for their observations." The key point is that they have "observations" they feel must be accounted for. Their observations are very careful, and the pieces appear to be falling together like a jig saw puzzle waiting to be solved. The math is working.
We have observations of the 'other side,' too, but because they are personal and anecdotal, despite their remarkable similarity, they aren't accepted as valid. These observations are unacceptable first because they are personal and anecdotal, and second, because they fall outside the beliefs of reductionist scientists who believe such a place cannot exist. So they never get to the stage of trying to account for these observations.
Originally posted by schuyler
I put this statement into the dogmatic religious category. No proof whatsoever coupled with an intolerant inflexible attitude. That's kind of religion in a nutshell and precisely why science wants nothing to do with religion. And it's exactly the opposite of what I feel needs to happen if we are to make any progress forward on understanding Reality.
Originally posted by daskakik
I think the real limiting factor to proving the existence of the other side is equipment which can measure whatever the other side has to measure. Without it there will never be anything but anecdotal evidence.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by schuyler
I put this statement into the dogmatic religious category. No proof whatsoever coupled with an intolerant inflexible attitude. That's kind of religion in a nutshell and precisely why science wants nothing to do with religion. And it's exactly the opposite of what I feel needs to happen if we are to make any progress forward on understanding Reality.
Alright then try the opposite: Cultivate negative thoughts and deeds and see what happens.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
reply to post by schuyler
Sounds like what you're looking for is occultism or esotericism. Have you ever looked into theosophy, anthoposophy, that sort of stuff?
Originally posted by GBP/JPY
reply to post by schuyler
dude....when you said you want "nuts and bolts"....the mechanics of it.....you did err
now go and actually read a good part of the bible...it knocks....your move. it'll be like supernatural magic!!
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by schuyler
The 'other side' cannot be measured because nothing cannot be measured.
This side there appears to be something but the 'other side' of something is nothing.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by schuyler
The 'other side' cannot be measured because nothing cannot be measured.
This side there appears to be something but the 'other side' of something is nothing.
That statement is completely nonsensical to me. It has no meaning at all. I believe that "the other side" CAN be measured, if it's there.
edit on 10/31/2012 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TWhatever
You know those that end posts with: light and love
This were shallow words to me, empty and meaninless till to those personal experiences.
Originally posted by schuyler
If we could learn how to freely communicate between these two realms, it would have profound implications for our world. In order to do that we must have a theoretical foundation, and that’s what I’m interested in pursuing.