Yesterdays 7.7 Earthquake Occurred Where The Worlds Largest Geoengineering Experiment Took Place, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 29-10-2012 @ 01:17 AM by Hydrawolf
reply to post by alfa1



I should have looked further into the story before posting.
Thanks for the speedy debunk!

Case closed.


reply posted on 29-10-2012 @ 01:26 AM by Skywatcher2011
reply to post by Hydrawolf



So you are saying that the iron dumped into the ocean off BC's west coast caused this earthquake?


reply posted on 29-10-2012 @ 02:34 AM by tj1980h
reply to post by jaxnmarko

The term "artificial plankton" has been thrown around a lot... Here is just one example www.cbc.ca...


reply posted on 29-10-2012 @ 02:49 AM by Mandrakerealmz
reply to post by Hydrawolf



I wonder if the mass quantity of iron present within the water helps with using HAARP or other such devices. Mass amounts of suspended iron. Even if its in plankton now.



reply posted on 29-10-2012 @ 03:16 AM by maryhinge
reply to post by Hydrawolf



A scrap yard would of been my choice to dump 100 tons of iron £££££

What would be the point of this experiment anyway ?

this is from one of the links in OP


100 tons of iron…. so basically, the equivalent of a ship sinking. A large cargo ship can have a deadweight of over 200,000 tons all by itself. And what are “artificial plankton”? 100 tons of iron is just not that much. Just ONE cubic meter of iron weighs nearly 8000 kilos!
edit on 29/10/2012 by maryhinge because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 29-10-2012 @ 04:18 AM by waynos
reply to post by JesusChristwins



Earthquakes aren't caused by weather, they are geological events. You can predict an earthquake anywhere in the word and be right if the timing doesn't matter


reply posted on 29-10-2012 @ 04:38 AM by JesusChristwins
reply to post by waynos



Did i predicted it through weather? I predicted it through HAARP's actions.

If you find it so easy to predict earthquakes then tell me where one it will happen and tell me the season it will happen.


reply posted on 29-10-2012 @ 04:45 AM by waynos
reply to post by JesusChristwins



You say that like it makes a difference. You had a lucky guess, that's all, and I'm taking your word for it by the way. If your system works do it again, publicly on this board. If you are right I will believe you.

I'm not pretending to have a system or that HAARP has anything to do with it. Its the fact that you don't see why your claim is funny that's the real point here. You are just another mug that ascribes HAARP with powers it doesn't have, until you show otherwise.


reply posted on 29-10-2012 @ 10:27 AM by Uncinus
Originally posted by tj1980h
reply to
post by jaxnmarko

The term "artificial plankton" has been thrown around a lot... Here is just one example www.cbc.ca...



It's a journalist comprehension problem. What's being talked about is an "artificial plankton bloom", i.e. a artificial bloom of plankton, not a bloom of artificial plankton.

www.google.com..."artificial+plankton+bloom"
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



NOAA Doc Strong Evidence They Are and Have Been Spraying Us
  Posted 15 days ago with 36 member flags
Chemtrail Programs Only Cost Us $5 Billion a Year
  Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
Cost analysis of aerosol solar radiation management published
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
How do elites escape chemtrails?
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
ChemTrails over Michigan
  Posted 11 days ago with 3 member flags
Geo-engineering (Chemtrails) and Bible Prophecy
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags