Urgent Information Regarding 2012

Originally posted by OlafMiacov
reply to post by MyParadoxicalSelf

 

Sorry, aside from a loosely interpreted pseudoexistential diatribe about 'love' w/pics, I don't get what your post has to do with the "2012" title.

I also don't understand why you would quote Carl Rogers in your signature (i.e., “The curious paradox is that when I accept myself just as I am, then I can change.”) as a reference link to Schrödinger's cat, which is a quantum physics thought experiment, that although linguistically paradoxical, deviates from the Rogerian thesis of individual authenticity.

I will play along.

Please do not get upset with my words. I am not calling you dumb or anything

From what "you" see is TPTB that control us and do HORRID things

from this perspective it looks like fear

if you contact your SOURCE (hence the link to the HUMAN HEART) you can see from a "higher" perspective

As for the cat thing I guess you could say I opened the "box" so to speak

now i have an opportunity to change "in my eyes"

check out some of my other threads about the true nature of reality if you wish

Pay attention to the "quotes"

again do not get mad i am not attacking or calling names

i am not claiming to hold any super information or to be "better" than anyone

check out the "source" for yourself

Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by MyParadoxicalSelf

 

Dear MyParadoxicalSelf,

No need to apologize, I've known I'm not that smart for years and years. Recognizing that fact, I don't feel too badly about missing your message. Your message didn't imply that.

I don't understand what source you got in touch with, what you want us to do about it, frankly, I don't get the point. Perhaps if you reworded it for those of us who are a little slow?

With respect,
Charles1952

P.s. I'm getting the feeling that, just maybe, you're telling us to love each other. Still don't know about this "source" business, though. Maybe we're supposed to love the "source?" - C -

The "source" is your heart

The three I's is a "play" on words

We always look outward and forget we all have our very own source within our "self"

When I said three words it depends on how YOU view those words

Hence your initial reaction to claiming "I" called you stupid

It is a mirror back to how you view yourself

Ask yourself who was the "I" that said that

with respect

again i don't care about stars in the least

but its how many that comment got

and how many felt the same way as you did

we do not "know" our "self"

so we continue to play the game

i have just grown tired of it

my "self" questioning style is in hopes to make you question something or maybe for a new awareness to become availible

not trying to make people feel dumb

i have to SLEEP now now

take care and much love to you

This feels like you JUST got done watching a video about the Ascended Masters from the Galactic Federation and St. Germain, Angel Michael and Lord Ashtar (notice how they demote ALL of the characters of Bible to roles that are under their titles, lol. Sounds like the Ascended Masters don't want anyone to know they're the opposite of what they claim they are and are really: Fallen Angels.

So which Ascended Master video did you just watch --out of curiosity?

reply to post by OneNationUnder


I do not learn by watching i learn by doing

how do you learn?

reply to post by MyParadoxicalSelf


While I appreciate your respect for my feelings, I'm not easily upset & I do not have a short fuse. I have read some of your other posts, but am not interested in revisiting them at this time; however, that's not meant as disparaging.

As far as "playing along"--or answering my questions, w/o sounding curt, it's on you if you choose not to credit Rogers with your signature phrase & I gather that your "urgent 2012 information" is referring to a type of spiritual/metaphysical synthesis that you came upon from reading doomsday related material?

reply to post by OlafMiacov

Sorry, aside from a loosely interpreted pseudoexistential diatribe about 'love' w/pics, I don't get what your post has to do with the "2012" title. I also don't understand why you would quote Carl Rogers in your signature (i.e., “The curious paradox is that when I accept myself just as I am, then I can change.”) as a reference link to Schrödinger's cat, which is a quantum physics thought experiment, that although linguistically paradoxical, deviates from the Rogerian thesis of individual authenticity.

who is it that likes to use those big words?

the three words is a mirror that shows you how you view your "self" whether you accept it or not

did you happen to click the star for the gentleman that missed the "play" on words too?

who in your mirror is calling you dumb? maybe trying to use big words to sound "smart"

i pose that question as humbly and respectfully as "i" am able

Originally posted by OlafMiacov
reply to post by MyParadoxicalSelf

 

While I appreciate your respect for my feelings, I'm not easily upset & I do not have a short fuse. I have read some of your other posts, but am not interested in revisiting them at this time; however, that's not meant as disparaging.

As far as "playing along"--or answering my questions, w/o sounding curt, it's on you if you choose not to credit Rogers with your signature phrase & I gather that your "urgent 2012 information" is referring to a type of spiritual/metaphysical synthesis that you came upon from reading doomsday related material?

i am sorry you have totally missed the message

but I feel your frustration

i wish you the best

it's on you if you choose not to credit Rogers with your signature phrase

i attempted a few times but it was messing with the spaces

i figured people have Google and could easily see I did not "create" it?

so i just let it go

why would that bug you if you truly do not have a short fuse?

did you feel the need to make it sound like you knew who the quote was from?

Originally posted by MyParadoxicalSelf
reply to post by OlafMiacov

 

Sorry, aside from a loosely interpreted pseudoexistential diatribe about 'love' w/pics, I don't get what your post has to do with the "2012" title. I also don't understand why you would quote Carl Rogers in your signature (i.e., “The curious paradox is that when I accept myself just as I am, then I can change.”) as a reference link to Schrödinger's cat, which is a quantum physics thought experiment, that although linguistically paradoxical, deviates from the Rogerian thesis of individual authenticity.

who is it that likes to use those big words?

the three words is a mirror that shows you how you view your "self" whether you accept it or not

did you happen to click the star for the gentleman that missed the "play" on words too?

who in your mirror is calling you dumb? maybe trying to use big words to sound "smart"

i pose that question as humbly and respectfully as "i" am able

I'll interpret this as a decline to answer &/or that the "urgent 2012 information" is your special information. Thank you for sharing your 'special thoughts' with us. S&F for your time & candor.

Oh & you betcha, stars for everyone!

Originally posted by MyParadoxicalSelf

it's on you if you choose not to credit Rogers with your signature phrase

i attempted a few times but it was messing with the spaces

i figured people have Google and could easily see I did not "create" it?

so i just let it go

why would that bug you if you truly do not have a short fuse?

did you feel the need to make it sound like you knew who the quote was from?

edit on 28-10-2012 by MyParadoxicalSelf because: (no reason given)

Nothing to do with short-fuses, I respect Rogers & his work, so it coincided with my values to point out to you what I perceived as a plagiaristic slight.

reply to post by OlafMiacov

Namaste.

Thank you for the lessons, seriously.

these exchanges help me grow and I thank you kindly my friend

reply to post by OlafMiacov

I'll interpret this as a decline to answer

and I'll interpret that as you not looking in the mirror

that is the point

whether you choose to look in it or not is none of my businessmen

i was simply and humbly as possible trying to provide a catalyst

i was hoping our discourse would make you look in the mirror so to speak

best wishes and the flags are not necessary but i do appreciate the gesture

take care!

Originally posted by MyParadoxicalSelf
reply to post by OlafMiacov

 

I'll interpret this as a decline to answer

the thing is there is no answer...

that is the point

the mirror is you whether you choose to look at it or not is none of my businessmen

i was simply and humbly as possible trying to provide a catalyst

because when you get upset I feel it too

i was hoping our discourse would make you look in the mirror so to speak

best wishes and the flags are not necessary but i do appreciate the gesture

edit on 28-10-2012 by MyParadoxicalSelf because: (no reason given)

Although our thoughts & feelings differ, I appreciate yours. I apologize if you perceived my questioning as contributing to discourse, I was only seeking succinct clarity & did not mean to be perceived as crass. Thanks again for your time & efforts. All the best to you.

double post

reply to post by OlafMiacov

understood

again you have helped me realize something i needed to about myself

those mirrors can be a pain

thank you for the lesson

reply to post by MyParadoxicalSelf

Fear is not something I have ever felt about 2012 and feelings of doom are not a realistic expectation. However, what I have felt is inexplicable excitement and tremendous optimism for some of us.

reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread894184/pg

Fallen Angels.

Why did the angels fall?

Why are you really here?

What is an "angel" in you humble opinion?