It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ALERT Magnitude: 7.7 West Coast of Canada

page: 18
97
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 09:57 AM
link   
reply to post by detachedindividual
 


I agree with you.

Unless something else starts to happen,
this experience is over for the most part.


The possibilities are endless, however they are just possibilities.
edit on 28-10-2012 by Darkblade71 because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 09:58 AM
link   
reply to post by detachedindividual
 


While I agree with the sentiment of your post, please go to the link I provided in my earlier post (maybe 6 above yours urbansurvival.com...) and look at the trending of 7+ earthquake frequencies in the chart a lttle ways down the page. That IS historical data (going back to 1973) and there is no question that stronger quakes are trending up. Tony posts a second chart (not on the page linked) that shows a correlated trend of smaller quakes tredning in the opposite direction. Not fear-mongering but there is absolutely no question that something is changing.



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 09:59 AM
link   
G'day The Plejaren say a big one off the Oregon coast will be devastating, i know people will dought this but if your in a location near the coast there please consider getting to high ground as far from the coast if a big one hits off the Oregon coast , it cant hurt to take a drive in the right direction if it happens and listen to the radio, until a warning can be given 15-20 mins

Have a plan

I can sense big energy build-up in that location from the tectonic activity

Also San Fransisco will fall its just when

The tectonic plates are all messed up from ocean rise, dambs, big cities, nuke tests, floods, ice melt lifts pressure in other places etc..

edit on 28-10-2012 by hdonn because: (no reason given)

edit on 28-10-2012 by hdonn because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 10:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by whatnext21
Does anyone remember what happened prior to the 9.0 in Japan on March 11, 2011?

Magnitude 7.9 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN March 11, 2011
Magnitude 9.0 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN March 11, 2011
Magnitude 7.3 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN March 09, 2011

There was a mag 7.3 two days prior, not saying this will happen but you never know.


Ya good chance of a bigger one in the next day or so.
But I hope I'm wrong.



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:03 AM
link   
reply to post by whatnext21
 

Yes, sometimes there are precursors to a larger event. And quakes usually swarm. Subduction zones are typically the most intense. Heres a bit about Japans monster quake(s) last year...

The show begins about 1:40



Comparatively speaking this one off Canada was a non event... thank goodness. Hi tides, sun activity, rain, the moon, rain fall, etc., all theses things are related to earthquakes. Who knows what perfect chain of events sets off a trembler. However, there is nothing like an earthquake to rattle the nearby geology enough to trigger any others. Usually though the first one is the big one and the rest are a resettling of nearby strata that got rocked by it.

Plates move as fast as your fingernails grow so it takes a while to build enough tension to release in a quake we can feel. That is some powerful tension. Even though this was a series of 7's and lesser, it is a good thing that the ring of fire is moving. Moving plates are happy plates. As long as we are quaking on the western rim of the ring of Fire, everything is "okay".



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by itsallamile
I messaged my aunt who lives in Kelowna, British Colombia, luckily they didn't feel a thing and are ok.

Hope everyone is safe elsewhere.

I'm about 500 miles north of the Okanagan in a city called Prince George. There were some slight tremors reported here. I didn't feel them though. There hasn't been an earthquake here since around 1981 I think.



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:14 AM
link   
ok just got a 1.8 & 2.2 & 3.8 for Greater Los Angles area
maybe it moving south.
edit on 28-10-2012 by Trillium because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:28 AM
link   
Perhaps, some of you would like to jump into this thread: Is HAARP feeding SANDY? (The Conspiracy Side)



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:29 AM
link   
Another 5.1 and 4.9

quakes.globalincidentmap.com...



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:34 AM
link   
Looks like the Mayans were off on there prediction scale a little bit
None the less i am interested to see what this Frankenstorm will do and what other events occur in the future. Something big seemsto be brewing, i hope nothing to BIG.



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:37 AM
link   
So I'm a little concerned that we are starting to see exactly what I was afraid of: The after-shocks migrating down into the subduction zone.

There was a 4.2 quake off-shore Northern Vancouver. Same depth as all the after-shocks, following right down the line:


Magnitude 4.2 - WEST OF VANCOUVER ISLAND
This webpage is being phased out and is no longer maintained. Please use the new Real-time Earthquake Map instead and update your bookmark. See Quick Tips & User Guide.
2012 October 28 08:47:38 UTC
DetailsSummaryMapsScientific & TechnicalAdditional InfoEarthquake Details
This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
Magnitude 4.2
Date-Time Sunday, October 28, 2012 at 08:47:38 UTC
Sunday, October 28, 2012 at 01:47:38 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 51.634°N, 133.314°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region WEST OF VANCOUVER ISLAND
Distances 208 km (129 miles) SW of Masset, Canada
325 km (201 miles) WSW of Prince Rupert, Canada
436 km (270 miles) WSW of Terrace, Canada
601 km (373 miles) S of Juneau, Alaska

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 13.8 km (8.6 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST= 37, Nph= 37, Dmin=427.9 km, Rmss=1.31 sec, Gp=187°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=5
Source Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID


source with map

Can't really say for sure, ofcourse....but we need to pay close attention to this!



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:40 AM
link   
Well hopefully they will understand, the group that populates those regions are LIGHT, natives and in Bella Coola, many Norwegians settled there. They look after their own, and are the equality, except for the Government Council parts. Those regions are beautiful, and I would have lived there if it wasn't for that horrible road out that is pure terror, to drive on. But on the other hand, that road saves that valley from being destroyed. Crystal turquois creeks, hummingbirds, lush vegeatation and tall swiss like mountains. Big Foot sitings alot. Ancient hyroglyphs only like Hawaiin, polynesian looking natives, lemurian actually. A written language.

I think if they were planing on a sacrifice for their eclipse next month, they were chosing the wrong group. Dark cannot overcome LIGHT. And those people are LIGHT.



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Darkblade71
 


DarkBlade, can you concede that perhaps the fireballs were warnings of things to come?



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:46 AM
link   
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I made this prediction on a previous earthquake thread on October 6th. No one really listened to me or took me seriously. I saw this coming and I'm telling you this is not the end. This is just the initial jolt. I will predict here now that a much bigger event is going to occur very soon in this same general region or farther south closer to Vancouver Island.
edit on 28-10-2012 by mark1167 because: typo



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by prophetboy12
 


What fireballs are you talking about?
Did I miss something?



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Darkblade71
 


Meteors, shot over the bow. Your response Bugs.



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Darkblade71
 


I know the term "Major" is kind of defined by the person saying it. But When I hear of a "Major" Earthquake, I think along the lines of 9.0 or larger. 7.7 isn't really a major quake in my opinion.



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by mark1167
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I made this prediction on a previous earthquake thread on October 6th. No one really listened to me or took me seriously. I saw this coming and I'm telling you this is not the end. This is just the initial jolt. I will predict here now that a much bigger event is going to occur very soon in this same general region or farther south closer to Vancouver Island.
edit on 28-10-2012 by mark1167 because: typo


Can you quote your prediction here please:
The That is a Hit! Thread

I believe it is important to have as many sources as possible who have predicted this post it there.
Another thing that worries me about this EQ, a lot of people seem to have predicted it, which means there will be more. If it was no big deal, there wouldn't be so many people knowing it was coming in one form or another, or so I believe.



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 11:58 AM
link   
reply to post by swoopaloop
 


I see.

so a 7.7 is not a major EQ?

Watching all of the news last night, they were calling it a MAJOR eq.....using those EXACT words...



posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 12:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Darkblade71
reply to post by swoopaloop
 


I see.

so a 7.7 is not a major EQ?

Watching all of the news last night, they were calling it a MAJOR eq.....using those EXACT words...


Oh look!

7.0 - 7.9 is Major



new topics

top topics



 
97
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join