It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

MUST WATCH: Retired Lt. Col. and Special Operations Planner for 15 years, Obama ordered no response.

page: 12
49
<< 9  10  11    13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 02:13 PM
link   
The right has attempted to hype up any and everything that has (and at times hasnt) happened during the Obama admin.. Death panel's, birthers, UN action anywhere in the world, hes a muslim, turning the nation into an socialist nation, etc etc etc... I dont doubt this more right wing hype.. And the fact that few care? They should consider themselves the political equivalent of the boy who cried wolf at this point.




posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 02:15 PM
link   
reply to post by macman
 


no worries, they do indeed still use STU III's, or did back in '05. If aint broke don't fix it!



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 02:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Resurected
 


What does that post have to do with Lt. Col. Doug? Whether you're blinded by the Right/Left views or not the fact remains Washington DC did not aid the consulate at all that night.

Don't worry, Bush and his 8 regime was just as bad as Obama's 4 year regime, & no matter who wins this November America,& the world, clearly lose again.



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 02:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by macman
 


no worries, they do indeed still use STU III's, or did back in '05. If aint broke don't fix it!


I am sure that they are now not the latest and greatest and I do believe have been phased out.
But, the idea remains the same and the process is basically the same as well.
I loved working on them and doing the Crypto Comm stuff. Very fun.



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 02:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Resurected
The right has attempted to hype up any and everything that has (and at times hasnt) happened during the Obama admin.. Death panel's, birthers, UN action anywhere in the world, hes a muslim, turning the nation into an socialist nation, etc etc etc... I dont doubt this more right wing hype.. And the fact that few care? They should consider themselves the political equivalent of the boy who cried wolf at this point.


So, let me paraphrase.
"I love 0bama and he can do no wrong. If you criticize him you are racist and should just shut your dumb face hole".

There you go. Just use that as a reply and it will save you and everyone else time and effort.



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by macman

Originally posted by Resurected
The right has attempted to hype up any and everything that has (and at times hasnt) happened during the Obama admin.. Death panel's, birthers, UN action anywhere in the world, hes a muslim, turning the nation into an socialist nation, etc etc etc... I dont doubt this more right wing hype.. And the fact that few care? They should consider themselves the political equivalent of the boy who cried wolf at this point.


So, let me paraphrase.
"I love 0bama and he can do no wrong. If you criticize him you are racist and should just shut your dumb face hole".

There you go. Just use that as a reply and it will save you and everyone else time and effort.




I had to give you a star for that one as you made me laugh out loud. Good on you!



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 05:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by Grimpachi
 

Wait a minute, my claims of my naval career are unsubstantiated but yours aren't?'
.
.
.
So if keep on posting in this thread stating Doug is full of crap then you can expect me.
edit on 30-10-2012 by Swills because: (no reason given)


There's a big difference. Throughout this thread you have been asserting that you have special knowledge and experience, and claiming that this "verifies" Col. Doug's claims. We're just supposed to take your word for it. No thanks; the word of some pseudonymous internet commenter is not worth a hill of beans. If you want people to respect your opinion based on experience, it needs to be verifiable, or it counts squat.

Grimpachi only brought up his millitary background when YOU ASKED. And he never asked anyone to take his word for anything.



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 05:04 PM
link   
reply to post by MsAphrodite
 


So I take it the videos don't directly bear on the statements of Col. Doug.
Thats no surprise.



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 05:18 PM
link   
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer
 


When you work in the intelligence field you do have access to special knowledge, that's just how it works. My rate, job, in the USN was working directly with message traffic so I know exactly what the Lt. Col is talking about and I've also been saying the same thing right here on ATS, as seen in my first post in this thread. So Doug is just re enforcing what I've been saying all along, and anyone else who understands how message traffic works.

I've even posted my rates job description to help folks like you understand why I've been so vocal against you all. None of you have any clue how message traffic works and its delivery system, I do, & I'm trying to explain to you all how it works but yet you won't listen cuz you all are hell bent on not believing any of it for whatever silly reason. It's getting to the point where I'm going to post an censored pic of my DD 214 which confirms my rate, job, CTO, but even the I imagine it won't be good enough. So believe whatever you want, you're definitely on the side of ignorance I can tell you that.



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 05:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by Grimpachi
 


Actually I was chiding you for not finding the transcripts yourself. It took me about 30 seconds.



Your contempt came through crystal clear. Grimpachi showed a little class by not trying to turn it into some kind of side argument.


Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by Grimpachi
 

Did you not understand the amount of obvious insider information he had? Anyone who listens to the call will see clearly that he does know information none of us could know unless we had been involved with the military in that specific part of the world. Many other sources I have read confirm exactly what he said.


Your first argument is essentially that we should believe Col. Doug's claims because "Anyone who listens to the call will see clearly that he does know information" Essentially, we're supposed to think it "obvious' that Col. Doug is telling the truth. That's not an argument at all, I don't think.

Your second argument is that we should believe this story because "many other sources say the same". Presumably these sources are verifiable? In that case we should be discussing those sources, and not the unverifiable claims of Col. Doug. If none of the sources making these claims are verifiable, they're all worthless, probably just quoting each other.
edit on 10/30/2012 by DrEugeneFixer because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer
 


When you work in the intelligence field you do have access to special knowledge, that's just how it works. My rate, job, in the USN was working directly with message traffic so I know exactly what the Lt. Col is talking about and I've also been saying the same thing right here on ATS, as seen in my first post in this thread. So Doug is just re enforcing what I've been saying all along, and anyone else who understands how message traffic works.

I've even posted my rates job description to help folks like you understand why I've been so vocal against you all. None of you have any clue how message traffic works and its delivery system, I do, & I'm trying to explain to you all how it works but yet you won't listen cuz you all are hell bent on not believing any of it for whatever silly reason. It's getting to the point where I'm going to post an censored pic of my DD 214 which confirms my rate, job, CTO, but even the I imagine it won't be good enough. So believe whatever you want, you're definitely on the side of ignorance I can tell you that.


Well, if you expect people to just take your word for everything, I think you're destined to be disappointed.Maybe you could link to some verifiable information instead of repeating your unverifiable claims. Just a suggestion.



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 06:51 PM
link   
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer
 


I get the skepticism, I really do & it is what makes the ATS world go round but unless you're calling me a flat out liar what is it that you don't believe and why don't you believe it? What is it exactly about this whole Libyan mess you don't buy & why don't you buy it? Is it because you're an Obama supporter? Or do you just the love the US Govt & could not believe they would allow this attack too occur?

And far as reputable sources what exactly do you want? I did post a link that goes into great detail what my job in the USN was so what else would float your boat? I dunno, as I've said, I could provide all the proof your little heart would desire but I suspect you would cry foul.
edit on 30-10-2012 by Swills because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 07:10 PM
link   
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer
 


No they have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with what went down in Benghazi. They will in no way provide you with a clearer picture of the events and the sequence of events. Also forget about learning anything about who does what behind the scenes, their names etc.

Also you are welcome for the time I spent summarizing all of that for you.

Now put your fingers in your ears and say lalalalalalala...



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 07:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer
I could provide all the proof your little heart would desire but I suspect you would cry foul.


I guess we'll never know.



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 07:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Propulsion
The Obama folk will never accept the TRUTH, even if it were “smack” right in front of their faces!


[cough] birth certificate.. [/cough]



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 07:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Swills
 


Thank you so much for your posts. I really appreciate what you have contributed to this and other threads and your expertise really comes through.

I wonder what ever became of Out Kast Searcher? Have you seen him post lately?



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 07:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swills
You're telling me how a FLASH message works?


yes.


What nonsense?


That FLASH messages always go straight to the POTUS


Have you worked with such message traffic?


Yes


FLASH is a priority yes, the top priority, as in you stop whatever it is you're doing and give this message your complete attention. That is the only way to deal with a FLASH message, doesn't matter what part of the world you receive it in that is the protocol.


that is exactly what I said!!



Have you heard of a place called the Situation Room? It has computers that are connected to the DOD classified networks. These computers are most definitely manned by a watch team who monitor and send message traffic. But lets go off into fantasy land where the Situation Room doesn't exist and for some stupid reason the White House isn't connected to the DOD networks, there are still plenty of other places in Washington DC that are connected, like the Pentagon just to name one.


where did I say a situation room does not exist?

that's another not-so-little LIE invented.....


And just to point out, the FLASH message that went out would most likely never have been downgraded to an IMMEDIATE priority. Attack on a US Ambassador by terrorists does not get downgraded


And again - never said it did ....


So the bottom line is, when word got out there was an attack at the Benghazi compound a message went out and Washington DC was fully aware of it.


Washington DC is not a situation room - it is a city - the bottom line is you have no evidence whatsoever where the message went other than to the CIA - is is pure presumption that it made it to the Oval office immediately


What is it exactly that you keep arguing against?


The invention of so-called facts by you and others.


You don't think POTUS, the White House, or DC knew the attack was going down in real time? That they gave no order to stand down?


I see no evidence the the POTUS gave any such order or was aware of the attack in real time. as for "DC" - what is "DC" - where in the chain of command is this "DC" entity"??

SOMEONE in teh chain of comamnd gave ordders, SOMEONE knew what was happening in real time (more or less) - perhaps you should find some actual evidence WHO, rather than leaping to assumptions that you cannot support.


edit on 30-10-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 07:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Swills
 


I didn’t ask you to substantiate your claims but I am also not the one saying he can verify an Unknown callers claims.

Can you see the difference here?

I am saying I do not trust anonymous callers. (My military career shouldn’t matter with my doubts)

You are saying but it’s true I am military. (Where is the burden of proof in this matter?)

Do you still not see the difference? If not then I do not get your logic.

One un-vetted person indorsing another is not what I call reliable. You were in intelligence right? You should know this.



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 07:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


Did you watch the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearings entitled, "The Security Failures of Benghazi?" The videos are posted here on page 11.

Ms. Lamb from the DoS testifies that she was watching in real time. What more evidence do you need? If you can't be bothered to read what is here and do a bit of your own research you really shouldn't spout off uneducated opinions.

Editing to add that DC is where the CIC (read Obama) lives.
edit on 30-10-2012 by MsAphrodite because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2012 @ 08:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer

Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer
I could provide all the proof your little heart would desire but I suspect you would cry foul.


I guess we'll never know.


How disappointing, you ignore my entire post except for the last sentence. So I'll ask again, what is your motivation for being soooo skeptical? Are you voting for Obama next week? Do you believe everything the Govt tells you? Or do you just enjoy arguing with others no matter what?



new topics

top topics



 
49
<< 9  10  11    13 >>

log in

join