posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:11 PM
There are a few things that mark Savile out as extraordinary. He was not simply a paedophile, he was a hebophile and an ephebophile as well. If you
read up on it, rather call everyone by a single name, you will see that these are all different mindsets. Most paedophile lose interest in their
victims and do not seek out victims once they reach puberty. Gary Glitter, Savile's close friend, is a hebophile, he really only abuses girls who are
going through puberty, usually 12-14. Savile however, did the lot kids, pubescent and young under age young adults, ephebophile. Not only that, Savile
abused both sexes everyone was fair game to him.
Once you understand that normally, as far as it can ever be construed as anything like normal, an offender will fit one of these specific three
groups. With Savile it is almost unique as we are also pretty sure he went to the other end of the scale and was also a necrophiliac. In the end
though, the psychology of abuse of any sort is rooted in power. To that extent some, who indulge in deliberate under-age sexual liaisons do it as an
expression of their power. Others do it because their psychology means that they have feel the opposite, totally emasculated by adult life and then
resort to taking power over minors in order to assuage feelings of total inadequacy.
More often than not, the abusers were abused themselves and the American word " Fag" has it roots in the English Private and Public School system
where it stems from "Faggot". A Fag(got) was a younger male who was, in effect, an older boy's slave and that very often included sexual favours,
including sodomy. Ergo, for a couple of hundred years we have had, in Britain a succession of people in powerful positions of power who think, having
sex with minors is actually almost " A perk of the job" and is merely a continuation of the power structure they grew up with at school. In fact, in
one case in Jersey a teacher who was convicted actually told Police that very thing.
"Surely it's just a perk of the job?"
That means this sort of sexual behaviour has been almost endemic throughout whole strata of British society and just quietly ignored by the everyone
from the Church, a safe haven for them, to the justice system, often presided over by people who "understand" the crime and often personally, don't
see it as a "serious" offence. .
What really needs to be established now , with regards to Savile, is as follows. To what extent was his deliberate targeting of everyone r from
royalty through politicians to the pope was him simply engineering a situation that made him almost untouchable rather than, him acting as a procurer
for those who see themselves as above the law by dint of their position in society?
If you do your reading up on what's been happening at "The Groucho Club", On "Jersey", even the Mcanns kid vanishing you will see a definite
pattern. The moment under-age sex rears its' ugly head, then the following happens. records go missing , ala Peter Morrison, cautioned twice for
under-age cottaging, confirmed by the police, yet no documents anywhere to be found. The Dunblane massacre, shed loads of official documents put
under a 100 year rule that insiders have claimed, link the killer to a prominent Labour politician, later convicted of abusing children. The MP Tom
Watson has said that one of his most trusted source, who has been 100% accurate in everything they have ever tipped him off about, says the Met
Police in London have 100s if not 1000s of pages of evidence pertaining to the activities of Savile and yet, nothing was ever done, he was never even
interviewed about it all.
The excuse of, "It's the crime no-one wants to talk about or even contemplate could happen" has actually been used to hide what does seem to be
"an indulgence" that, a powerful elite and their friends wish to be able continue and no-one, including the police, are allowed to question it.
Lets be plain here, many of those who work in child protection think there's about the following chances, if you were a child before the turn of the
century. One in ten as a male that, you were inappropriately touched, abused or forced to take part in or watch, the abuse of others and 1 in 5 if
you were female.
I remember when , in the 1980s people began to openly talk about this sort of thing, between each other. I was in a room with 13 other people, 8 guys
6 girls and 8 of that 14 had been sexually abused as kids. One guy, who went to a private school, had been gang raped on a beach, during a school
trip, by older kids and a teacher to as he said "Put him in his place, as he was far too full of himself". The fact that six of us went to "single
sex middle class schools" probably skews the sample a bit, however it serves to show just how big a problem this really is and partly, why so many
are so reluctant to investigate.