It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say

page: 9
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 05:53 AM

Originally posted by WhySoBlinded

Originally posted by Vitruvian

Originally posted by OneisOne
reply to post by JacKatMtn

Thanks for posting and I agree with you. If this holds to be true it is enraging.
The 2 guys calling for help ended up getting killed because they just didn't want to stand down and let the ambassador and staff die.
A friend and I were talking about this this other day and she thinks the government wanted Stevens dead. Which if he was involved with running guns to militants, that very well could be the case. And it could explain why the CIA operators were told to stand down. Just this administration covering up another Iran–Contra.

Please see my posts here on the truth of the MURDER OF CHRIS STEVENS - you will find it very enlightening because it allows you to see Obama's personal hand in it all.

Then you might want to read this also

And remember who is keen on blaming Obama from the start on !
Its Romney with his scumbag liars club

I'm assuming you know is run by a Socialist.
Edit #1

I just read the Global Research article you linked and it's definitely worth reading.

It doesn't explain why Amb. Stevens was allowed to die.

Jazkaat may be right -- this was Obama's "October Surprise" that went terribly wrong.
Edit #2

WhySoBlinded, did you even read the article you linked?

Obama KNEW. You must mean Obama, Head of the "Scumbag Liars Club."

Romney knew Obama was responsible for the screw-up -- Romney was right about this from the beginning.

edit on 27-10-2012 by AuranVector because: to add more info

edit on 27-10-2012 by AuranVector because: to add a question

edit on 27-10-2012 by AuranVector because: to clarify

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 06:56 AM
the MSM along with Congressional Investigation are dragging their feet

the fact that the CIA was ordered to stand down,,,, along with the time stamped E-Mails of the militant attack being executed & underway within 2 hours of the start (when the Pres, VP, and other high echelon leaders were at a closed WH meeting) and could have begun reinforcement action but the Prez chose to wave the BS flag that the 'protest' was the result of a bad YT video...and that 'he' was friends & held in high esteem by the whole Islasmic world

None of this is to be "Officially" released to the public until after the early voting and the scheduled election day vote tally is complete.

What kind of democracy is that.... truth is ---that ain't democracy thats a tolatarian state of propaganda and insanity directing the USAs geo-political posture...
it's a top down situation of lies, deception, obfuscation, misdirection...and whatever else the CIC decides he wants to do
edit on 27-10-2012 by St Udio because: (no reason given)

edit on 27-10-2012 by St Udio because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 07:15 AM
i culd give you my interpetations as to why, but most would think i was crazy.
has to do with pedophiles, operation dormouse and torture going back 3 decades

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 07:20 AM
reply to post by Wrabbit2000

They were watching it in real time. They knew what was going on. Of all the tech. that the govt has, things we cannot even begin to understand, they saw it in real time. That has been said. The President knew. That is part of the standing orders that are in place. If the President didn't know about this, how can we trust him when it comes to our own security at home. This is dangerous, very dangerous for us here in the United States.

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 07:26 AM
reply to post by GhostLancer

There are things that cannot even happen without the Presidents ok, or that he be made aware of. You are kidding I hope. He is the Commander in Chief isn't he? He is in charge. Don't think for a moment that he didn't know. The Ambassader is a very important person. He is like a 4 start Colonel or General. And the fact that he was under attack, they knew immediately, that is proven by the cables that was sent. Its a horrible situation when an Ambassader is in trouble or his life is threatened even worse when he is missing. And for quite a while they didn't know where he was at. This whole thing stinks. Really bad.

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 07:38 AM
Please check out this link and listen to a former or current military man explain how this was handled.

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 07:42 AM
Well if you were on the top tier of decision making you might want to just make sure that you and you teamates boat floats no matter what happens either in your control or otherwise.

part of the beauty of being a well protected public figure of sorts.
edit on 27-10-2012 by tekeen because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:06 AM
I would to go further and say this is looking like a hit job, and the drones overhead were there to make sure the job got done. Such an operation would have little in the way of repercussions, you get immediate outrage from the right / support from the left - the only downside would be if it gets out that this was planned.

I am becoming more and more disgusted with the power elite, disgusted how people are scammed into the two party system - all the while the industrial military complex, the global elite are laughing it up and controlling everything (they are going to start nation building in Libya now)

and don't know if it has been posted but:

AC-130U Gunship was On-Scene in Benghazi, Obama Admin Refused to Let It Fire


Yes, I know I am no supporter of Obama, but I have to ask this question - why hasn't Romney and the Republicans demand an accounting of the president. I think it is because they are just as bad as the Democrats, and if Romney wins, he would be more then willing to do what Obama did.
edit on 27-10-2012 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:07 AM

not every report gets to the potus, and he doesn not make every decision

and that goes for a GOP pres or a dem pres, btw

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:20 AM
reply to post by MidnightTide

Some links to show that there is a lot of money to be made in Libya and stuff like this only sweetens the pot:

GE could make $10bn revenue from Libya

Libya asks for help to restructure oil facilities

(wonder who is going to be footing that bill, the same ones who are footing the bill for Iraqi and Afghanistan)

This is like the motto: you break it, you bought it approach.....and who are the winners of that?

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:20 AM
reply to post by syrinx high priest

The coded flash messages went out from the consulate at the very beginning of the SEVEN hour long attack.
These were the messages that have extremely high priority, the kind that they awake the President from his sleep when they come through. The thing here is, the President wasn't sleeping.

In fact, he was in a meeting one hour and twenty minutes after the attack began. A meeting with the Secretary of Defense and his national security advisor. At that point, there was real time video available to watch of the attack in progress. You know, the kind of video that the President was proud to proclaim that he watched when Osama bin Laden was killed.

You are going to try to get people to swallow the premise that the President was not informed of what was happening..... Even though he was fully awake and sitting in a meeting at the White House? A meeting concerning Defense and NationalSecurity?

If you are correct, then this President has been the most inept one that we have ever had.

The Obama apologists can try, but I am not buying it.

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:27 AM
reply to post by JacKatMtn
Why is it that with all the info on this incident and Obama's back ground and his life long associations, all the radical Muslims visiting the Whitehouse that they will not comment on does no one consider the fact there may be an radical Muslim in the Whitehouse??

I did not read all the post so if someone has hit on this already I am sorry for repeating it.

edit on 27-10-2012 by Battleline because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:32 AM
reply to post by syrinx high priest

BTW This went to POTUS. Listen to the link from the Retired Lt. Colonel. There are times when you have to look at the facts.

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:36 AM
Bad judgement from the people we would look to for information on where is relatively safe to travel.

Africa is the kind of place you roll with all you 1rst world toys and hard pipe hitting nukkas you know what I am saying.

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:46 AM
For christ sakes, stop being such mindless lemmings and exercise some analytical thought.

The ONLY sources listed in ANY of these Benghazi stories are "unnamed". Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty are dead, so they can't confirm or deny these reports.

This story 100% unconfirmed by anyone willing to be named, and therefore 100% unreliable - especially during campaign season. There is a reason that no networks other than Fox are crowing about it - it's because the story is most likely a lie to discredit Obama and make his administration look bad.

Remember, this is the network that sued in Florida FOR THE RIGHT TO LIE IN THEIR NEWS BROADCASTS

If anything, people should be pissed off at some campaign hack using dead seals as campaign tools.

Until NAMES OF LIVING PEOPLE are released that can confirm this story - it is bulls&(t
edit on 10/27/2012 by atlguy because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:47 AM
reply to post by butcherguy

We may never get the true story of exactly what happened and why the Executive branch made the decision to do nothing as Americans who dedicated their life to foreign service had their cries for help fall on deaf ears.

With the current information that has been leaked (by brave Americans who understand the truth needs to be shared with the public and individuals like General Petraeus whose public statements are a clear example that loyalty to his country's values trump loyalty to a president) one might ascertain that the Executive branch found it more important to create a scapegoat to explain the attacks. So while Americans were being savagely attacked and killed the White House was creating a fable about an offensive video, an out of control spontaneous protest and a storyline explaining photos of the murderers posing with the corpse of an American Ambassador by claiming that they were good-natured people trying to get the Ambassador to a hospital.

What hasn't been touched on in any report is how the Executive branch's lies about the video caused the video to go viral throughout the region only following the attacks and that the view counts for any version of the video on the internet prior to the attack were so incredibly small that it would be impossible to be a catalyst for a protest. Sure the video aired on an Egyptian TV show three days before the attack but the total potential audience for that program is small and that show does not air in Libya. Essentially I am trying to make it clear that the Administration's lies about the video and using the media to make it go viral are the clear cause of the subsequent attacks and protests throughout the world which have been the catalyst for the new wave of anti-American sentiment and further unrest.

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:50 AM
Wow bro you sure got it out for those who wonder about this event.

Thats some might fine politcal lingo there hoss.

All the same they were overpowered and Africa is as hot as it gets in terms of potential for fights.

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:51 AM
reply to post by atlguy

Just wait. Be careful for what you ask for. This hasen't reached the peak yet. We will know more and then you can have your questions satisfied.

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 08:57 AM
It could be possible that some people are afraid to say anything for fear of their life. But not to worry the people that were alive at the time of the fight had sent messages, and that is how we know that they were told to stand down 3 times. But they didn't. A couple went into try and save the ambassader and those that were with them. And they lost their lives becasue of it. Where is our mighty power and tech. We have it. Why wasent it deployed. There are soldiers that can tell you that they were ready to go but were told to strand down. Why?

posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 09:00 AM
I also think someone will resign over this and it wont be POTUS! Others will take the fall. As the father of one that lost his life, he is hoping that our gov. has the moral fiber that his son had. Also, he forgives all involved and just wants the people responsible to own up to it. This is about Honor. We don't hear much about that anymore.

top topics

<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in