It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spinalremain
The fact of this issue is that supply side is nothing more than a scam.
If supply side economics was a job creator, why are we suffering unemployment upward of 8% right now?
We tried it for decades. It doesn't work and now the public knows it doesn't work. Stop pushing the elite agenda and start using your brain, people.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by jibeho
Originally posted by Taiyed
reply to post by jibeho
OH, well if you say so, then I guess Ben Stein (a respected economic mind) is just wrong.
I'm sure you have credentials that match or exceed Mr Steins, right? Could we hear what those credentials are?
Too Funny!!
Just look up what I said. I study history...
So, its wrong to think that Stein may be on the wrong side of history....???
Whatever floats your boat buddy...edit on 26-10-2012 by jibeho because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Oouthere
Entitlements are the problem.
a. I was 10 years active duty and got paid $25k to leave when the iron curtain fell, a company can't afford to do that.
b. Paying someone 50% pay for the rest of their life after working 20 years? Impossible to sustain.
c. People making minimal wage or making nothing and living in $100k+ houses for free. Not sustainable.
d. Illegals flooding across the borders and taking our jobs, taking more jobs than our unemployment rate. Unsustainable.
e. Forcing hospitals to give medical care to anyone that walks in a door and having bankrupted over 80 hospitals because of illegals doing this. Unsustainable.
f. Over $5 billion in security and travel funds for a president's four years in office. Unsustainable.
g. Schools falling further behind in education levels because no child can be left behind and poorly performing teachers are protected by the unions. Unsustainable.
Entitlements are the problem.
Rich
Originally posted by Oannes
Reverse the Regan era tax code, problem solved. The people that can afford to pay, don't.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Well, it's just a wild thing to see who has what opinions these days, isn't it? Take this one for instance...
By the way....this, from their own reports:
How is it the Rich don't pay their fair share? The Federal Government simply SPENDS MORE than even this tax structure can support and that's going quite a distance.edit on 26-10-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Oannes
Reverse the Regan era tax code, problem solved. The people that can afford to pay, don't.
"The biggest growth and prosperity we've ever had in this country was from roughly 1941 to 1973. That was the best years we've ever had and those were years of much higher taxes than we have now." "Taxes were at 70, 80 percent then," said Steve Doocy. "And yet, we were very prosperous," Stein replied. "The highest rate was in the 90s during parts of the 50s, and yet we were very prosperous."
1. The 1950s was no Golden Age. The U.S. economy grew by an average of 3.4% a year between 1948 and 2007. How did the 1950s do in comparison? If you measure the 1950s from 1950 to 1959, it did a bit better than average, growing at an annual rate of 3.6%. If you measure the decade from 1951 to 1960, it grew at a below average 3.0% rate. The period also saw three recessions, July 1953-May 1954, August 1957-April 1958, and April 1960-February 1961. Now, overall, it was a strong period for the economy, especially for folks with still-fresh memories of the Great Depression. But recall that John F. Kennedy’s 1960 presidential campaign said he would “get this country moving again.” That’s a slogan a politician uses after a decade of stagnation, not hypergrowth. (Of course, JFK sharply cut taxes and the economy boomed.)
From 1950 to 1963, income tax revenue averaged 7.5 percent of GDP; that’s less than in the Reagan years when rates were being slashed. This could suggest that rates are right around the Laffer Curve equilibrium point in the current economy.
The post-war U.S. economy was in an incredibly strong international position. Did the the “91% or Bust” crowd forget about World War Two? A National Bureau of Economic Research study described the situation this way: “At the end of World War II, the United States was the dominant industrial producer in the world. With industrial capacity destroyed in Europe—except for Scandinavia—and in Japan and crippled in the United Kingdom, the United States produced approximately 60 percent of the world output of manufactures in 1950, and its GNP was 61 percent of the total of the present (1979) OECD countries. This was obviously a transitory situation.”
When you’re as dominant as the U.S. was, it papers over a lot of bad economic policy coming from Washington. Today, of course, America competes with a slew of strong, technologically advanced economies including the EU, China, and Japan.
The dishonesty or perhaps ignorance in the tax debate that is going on today is the complete misrepresentation of the pre-TRA86 [Tax Reform Act of 1986] higher marginal rates in the old ’53 code. Sure the marginal rates were insane, but the underlying tax code was rife with loopholes that a good tax planner (I was one) could exploit to get a person’s effective tax rate as low or lower then it is today. Those loopholes are no longer part of the tax code which is a good thing as they encouraged investors to invest in projects that had no economic viability other then the income sheltering effect they created.
What else is ignored in the conversation is the fact that there was a massive amount of tax fraud at all income levels under the old code. It was so bad and so common that most people took pride in telling others how they cheated on their taxes. When I was practicing it was quite common for us to pick up clients that had owned businesses that had grown into large enterprises that cheated extensively on their income taxes sometimes for decades. Usually the only reason this ever got exposed was due to the owners wanting to sell or go public.
The nation was not prosperous because of the High Taxes