It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ok...after walking away for a moment...I am truly TRYING to understand the issue here...if I pay into a system as well as you...what makes your choice of not having the option of BC and abortion
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by rockhndr
Ok...after walking away for a moment...I am truly TRYING to understand the issue here...if I pay into a system as well as you...what makes your choice of not having the option of BC and abortion
This issue arose out of Sandra Fluke as a Democrat operative wanting a Catholic Institution (Georgetown University) to pay for her contraception. She chose this University knowing full well it did not provide for contraception, and further tried to force policy changes. Then the Obama admin invited her to testify before Congress and invited her to support their party platform of encouraging abortions and contraception. Sandra knew what she was doing when she entered Georgetown. The issue is one of forcing religious institutions, particularly Catholic to change their policy.edit on 26-10-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: typo
thinkprogress.org...
ky on Apr 27, 2012 at 10:10 am
Since the Obama administration promulgated a new rule requiring employers and insurers to provide preventive health care services — including contraception coverage — some Catholic institutions have taken great offense to the regulation and accused the White House of waging a war against their religious objection to birth control. The rule exempts religious institutions and affiliated organizations from providing the benefit and offers employers a year-long grace period to implement the measure.
And while some Catholic colleges have responded to the controversy by stripping contraception from their plans, Georgetown University — the nation’s first Catholic institution of higher learning — has announced that it will not adopt any changes to its health insurance policies and will continue to provide birth control coverage to its employees. In a letter obtained by ThinkProgress dated April 26, 2012, President John J. DeGioia informs the Georgetown community that the University will offer contraception “for students who require them for health reasons unrelated to birth control,” and will institute “no change to the University’s approach to contraceptive coverage for employees”:
After thoughtful and careful consideration, we will continue our current practice for contraceptive coverage in our student health insurance for the coming year, as allowed for under the current rules issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
There will also be no change to the University’s approach to contraceptive coverage for employees for 2013.
We will be monitoring further regulatory and judicial developments related to the Affordable Care Act. I hope this is helpful in clarifying a matter of concern to many of you.
In 2007, it received about $14.8 million in federal funds for research, with 64% from the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, the United States Department of Energy, and the Department of Defense.[66] In 2010, the school received $5.6 million from the Department of Education to fund fellowships in several international studies fields.[67] Georgetown University Medical Center received an additional $118.4 million from these and other government sources.[66] Georgetown's Vincent Lombardi Cancer Center is one of 41 research-intensive comprehensive cancer centers in the United States, and developed the breakthrough HPV vaccine for cervical cancer in 2006.[68]
Originally posted by rockhndr
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Alright, I am seeing a different picture here and understanding now that the reasoning is on the wall...and on THAT issue I fully agree...the religious institution should not be infringed upon in its established beliefs as a religion...and an AHHH moment just occured!! I see now how PEOPLE in that religion could not want the option in healthcare...with that said though, don't we have a seperation of church and government? Meaning, what is paid into taxes, or even government healthcare should not have to abide by the few in the religious sect? (regardless of what religion)
Originally posted by 3chainz
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
Um people pay for their insurance plan, nothing is being provided for free. You fail to understand how insurance works.
edit on 26-10-2012 by 3chainz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dawnstar
reply to post by rockhndr
those religious institutions are made up of religious individuals though, some of them own their own businesses, have their own employees that they insure...others are employees of various businesses, ect....
so, why should the institution itself be protected, but not the individuals that make up that insutution...
if catholic charities should be protected, why shouldn't it be just as appropriate to protect the catholic individual is what I am asking...
or the jahova witness?? maybe my insurance shouldn't cover blood transfusion, just so it doesn't offend a follower of that religion???
I always thought the constitutional protections were more for individuals rights and not for institutions rights???
Yes, exactly. If religious people don't believe in abortions, then they shouldn't get them
There are plenty of good reasons to be annoyed. From the conservative point of view, Fluke is on the wrong side of a battle over religious freedom. Back in March, she testified in favor of a proposed Obama administration rule that would require Catholic institutions, like her own Georgetown University law school, to reject the teaching of their church and cover contraception in their university health plans -- plans not funded by taxpayers, by the way, but by tuition and other university revenues.
The rule exempts religious institutions and affiliated organizations from providing the benefit and offers employers a year-long grace period to implement the measure.
President John J. DeGioia informs the Georgetown community that the University will offer contraception “for students who require them for health reasons unrelated to birth control,” and will institute “no change to the University’s approach to contraceptive coverage for employees”:
After thoughtful and careful consideration, we will continue our current practice for contraceptive coverage in our student health insurance for the coming year, as allowed for under the current rules issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services. thinkprogress.org...