It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


FukuGate: We've been conned

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

+97 more 
posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 01:05 PM

We’ve Been Conned

[color=chartreuse]Secret documents prove
global cover-up of continued
Fukushima radiation pollution

A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by





has unearthed a shocking series of new evidence proving

a deliberate,
global cover-up
of the true severity of the
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster.

The executive branch and multiple federal agencies, agencies tasked with keeping the American public safe, did their best to hide and to cover-up information about a deadly radioactive plume and ensuing fallout that was headed for the West Coast of the United States from Japan.

And the unfortunate reality is that the mainstream media continues to blatantly ignore this colossal scandal.

We calls it as we sees it.

con·spir·a·cy noun kən-ˈspir-ə-sē
plural con·spir·a·cies

Definition of CONSPIRACY
1 : the act of conspiring together
2 a : an agreement among conspirators
b : a group of conspirators

Private emails, meeting transcripts and other key documents reveal that both the Obama White House and the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) were well aware of just how bad things really were with Fukushima from the early days of the disaster,

“...but did nothing to warn the public about it.”

[color=aqua]“In fact, NRC and the White House purposely did not warn Americans about a massive radiation plume that struck the West Coast just days after the massive earthquake and tsunami hit Japan's eastern coast.”

Once in the jet stream, the radioactive particles travel across the Northern Hemisphere, coming back down to earth with rain, snow, or other precipitation.

Five days after the Fukushima meltdowns began, radioactive fallout from the disaster reached the West Coast of the United States.

Approximately a week later, Fukushima fallout was measured as far away as France.

Simulation Map of Cesium-137 Deposition Across the Pacific by CEREA Shows Contamination in US Greater Than That of Western Japan

France's CEREA has the simulation map of ground deposition of Cesium-137 from the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant accident on its "Fukushima" page. It not only shows Japan, but also the entire northern Pacific Rim, from Russian Siberia to Alaska to the West Coast of the US to the entire US.

According to the map, the US, particularly the West Coast and particularly California, may be more contaminated with radioactive cesium than the western half of Japan or Hokkaido.

It looks more contaminated than South Korea or China. Canada doesn't look too well either, particularly along the border with US on the western half.

Before the self-serving unethical removal of all tracking systems from public view by those with a vested interest, the Fukushima IRSN (France) site published this cesium dispersion map clearly indicating worldwide saturation of not only Iodine-131, but also Cesium-137.

[font=times new roman][color=fuchsia]Gee whiz, Wally, haven’t we been sounding the alarm since that fateful day?[/font]

Will America's Nuclear Power Plants Fail in an 8.0 Earthquake?

According to information gathered from hundreds of pages worth of private NRC emails, conference calls and secret meetings, key players in the Fukushima whitewashing campaign, including the NRC's David McIntyre and Elliot Brenner, were hard at work in the days following the disaster distracting public attention away from it.

David McIntyre also works in the NRC on public affairs, and spent much of his time creating carefully crafted e-mails that constantly downplayed the disaster, and any relationship that might be made to the safety status of US nuclear stations.”

The above map depicts the locations of the 104 Commercial Nuclear Reactors in America.

Information pertaining to radiation monitoring worldwide from a variety of sources was suppressed and subsequently scrubbed from the Internet.

This was from CTBT Science and Technology in Vienna, Austria.

Just in case one might want to contact these unethical, slimy reptoid-lizard 'public servant’ inept individuals who supposedly work for we, the people and who are actually engaged in the ongoing conspiracy to distract the America people from the inescapable truth:
America's Being Nuked: Can Together We Stop the Madness?

Here is the contact information:

Office of Public Affairs
Washington, DC 20555-0001
Director: Eliot Brenner
Senior Level Advisor: Holly Harrington
Public Affairs Officers: Scott Burnell, David McIntyre, Ivonne Couret
Telephone: 301-415-8200?
Website: NRC: Home Page

By pretending that a radioactive plume did not exist while simultaneously sending out misinformation to the media, these two, in conjunction with White House officials,

actively participated
in a criminal cover-up
of the truth.

as a distraction to divert public attention away from Fukushima, and away from the dozens of commercial nuclear reactors in America that are of a similar age and vulnerability as Fukushima.

A total of 111,592,997 people (36% of the total population of the US) live within 50 miles of a nuclear plant.

The USGOV/NRC is quick to bandy about the ‘104’ reactors number to instill in the American psyche that the above map of those reactors is the end of it.

This is hardly all of the ill-fated truth.

One of these nukes may be in a neighborhood near you.

How much do you really know about the number and locations of these death-dealing monstrosities?

How many people live near a nuclear power plant in the USA?

Sixty-five (65) commercial nuclear power plants (with 104 reactors) are currently in operation in the United States. After radioactive material escaped from Japan’s Fukushima power plant, everyone within 30 kilometres (18 miles) of the doomed plant was evacuated.

Our map shows how many people live close to US nuclear power plants who would have to be evacuated in a similar situation. We have also included three Canadian nuclear power plants that are dangerously close on our Northern border.

Click here for interactive map of U.S. Nuclear Power Reactor Locations and Population within 10 and 50 miles.

Another gigantic elephant in the American room is the veritable plethora of nuclear facilities that are not included in the much bandied about ‘104 commercial reactors’ number - which is designed to lull some of the less-informed (yes, LeDave, you people on Rio Linda), to ignore these not-so-nice neighbors whom may be quietly polluting your neighborhood - forever - with the nuclear waste shell game.

Here is the Construction and Operating License Status for the US as of this writing:

Just for grins, let’s see how many of these other nukes might be near you?

Plutonium production reactors (14)
Hanford Site, Washington
> B-Reactor (Pile) - Preserved as a Museum
> F-Reactor (Pile) - Cocooned
> D-Reactor (Pile) - Cocooned
> H-Reactor (Pile) - Being Cocooned
> DR-Reactor (Pile) - Cocooned
> C-Reactor (Pile) - Cocooned
> KE-Reactor (Pile) - Being Cocooned
> KW-Reactor (Pile) - Being Cocooned
> N-Reactor - Being Cocooned

Savannah River Site, South Carolina
> R-Reactor (Heavy Water) - S&M (Surveillance and Maintenance) Mode
> P-Reactor (Heavy Water) - S&M Mode
> L-Reactor (Heavy Water) - S&M Mode
> K-Reactor (Heavy Water) - S&M Mode
> C-Reactor (Heavy Water) - S&M Mode

Army Nuclear Power Program
Main article: Army Nuclear Power Program
> SM-1: 2 MWe. Fort Belvoir, VA.
> SM-1A: 2 MWe, plus heating. Fort Greely, Alaska.
> PM-2A: 2 MWe, plus heating. Camp Century, Greenland.
> PM-1: 1.25 MWe, plus heating. Sundance, Wyoming.
> PM-3A: 1.75 MWe, plus heating and desalinization. McMurdo Station, Antarctica.
> MH-1A: 10 MWe, plus fresh water supply to the adjacent base.
Mounted on the Sturgis, a barge (no propulsion systems)
converted from a Liberty ship, and moored in the Panama
Canal Zone.
> SL-1: Boiling water reactor, 300kWe, National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho.
> ML-1: first closed cycle gas turbine

ML-1, first closed cycle gas turbine. Initial criticality March 30, 1961. Designed for 300 kW, but only achieved 140 kW. Operated for only a few hundred hours of testing. The ML-1 was designed by Aerojet General Corporation to test an integrated reactor package that was transportable by military semi-trailers, railroad flatcars, and barges. This reactor was shut down in 1965.

Key to the codes:
= First letter: S - stationary, M - mobile, P - portable.
= Second letter: H - high power, M - medium power, L - low power.
= Digit: Sequence number.
= Third letter: A indicates field installation.

It might be worth noting here that just the US Nuclear Fleet generates in excess of 10,000 tons of high-level radioactive spent fuel per year.

Do the math and then ask this: how is this deadly material transported to where it’s being stored - which brings us to the next logical conclusion:

[color=chartreuse]It is sheer insanity to keep generating this deadly radioactive waste with no long-term safe storage plan.

United States Naval Reactors

Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory

Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) is a research and development facility dedicated to the support of the US Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program. KAPL is a government-owned, contractor operated laboratory run by Bechtel Marine Propulsion Corporation for the United States Department of Energy. KAPL is responsible for the research, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of U.S. nuclear-powered warships.

KAPL operates two sites in the Schenectady, New York area: the Knolls site in Niskayuna and the Kenneth A. Kesselring site in West Milton. Niskayuna is the primary site for the KAPL, focusing on the design and development of naval propulsion plants and reactor cores. The West Milton site operates land-based prototypes of shipboard reactor plants.

This site is also used to train officers and enlisted personnel for the U.S. Navy's fleet of nuclear powered vessels. KAPL employs more than 2,600 people at these sites and others, mostly shipyards in the states of California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Virginia, and Washington.

Main article: List of United States Naval Reactors

Research reactors
Arkansas-Southwest Experimental Fast Oxide Reactor, Arkansas
> SEFOR - Shut Down
Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois (and Idaho)
> CP-1 - Chicago Pile 1 (Relocated and renamed as
Chicago Pile 2 in 1943) - Shut Down
> CP-3 - Chicago Pile 3 - Shut Down
> CP-5 - Chicago Pile 5 - Shut Down (1979)
> EBWR - Experimental Boiling Water Reactor - Shut Down
> LMFBR - Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor - Shut Down
> Janus reactor - Shut Down (1992)
> JUGGERNAUT - Shut Down
> IFR - Integral Fast Reactor - Never Operated [citation needed]

Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
> High Flux Beam Reactor - Shut Down (1999)
> Medical Research Reactor - Shut Down (2000)
> Brookhaven Graphite Research Reactor - Shut Down (1968)

Hanford Site, Washington
> Fast Flux Test Facility - currently in cold standby Core drilled

Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho
> ARMF-I - Shut Down
> AMRF-II - Shut Down
> ATR - Operating
> ATRC - Operating
> AFSR - Shut Down
> BORAX-I - Shut Down
> BORAX-II - Shut Down
> BORAX-III - Shut Down
> BORAX-IV - Shut Down
> BORAX-V - Shut Down (1964)
> CRCE - Shut Down
> CFRMF - Shut Down
> CET - Shut Down
> Experimental Test Reactor - Shut Down
> ETRC - Shut Down
> EBOR - Never Operated
> EBR-I - Experimental Breeder Reactor I (originally CP-4) - Shut Down
> EBR-II - Experimental Breeder Reactor II - Shut Down
> ECOR - Never Operated
> 710 - Shut Down
> GCRE - Gas Cooled Reactor Experiment - Shut Down
> HTRE-1 - Heat Transfer Reactor Experiment 1 - Shut Down
> HTRE-2 - Heat Transfer Reactor Experiment 2 - Shut Down
> HTRE-3 - Heat Transfer Reactor Experiment 3 - Shut Down
> 603-A - Shut Down
> HOTCE - Shut Down
> A1W-A - Shut Down
> A1W-B - Shut Down
> LOFT - Shut Down
> MTR - Shut Down
> ML-1 - Mobil Low Power Plant - Shut Down
> S5G - Shut Down
> NRAD - Operating
> FRAN - Shut Down
> OMRE - Shut Down
> PBF - Shut Down
> RMF - Shut Down
> SUSIE - Operational
> SPERT-I - Shut Down
> SPERT-II - Shut Down
> SPERT-III - Shut Down
> SPERT-IV - Shut Down
> SCRCE - Shut Down
> SL-1/ALPR - Stationary Low Power Plant - Shut Down
> S1W/STR - Shut Down
> SNAPTRAN-1 - Shut Down
> SNAPTRAN-2 - Shut Down
> SNAPTRAN-3 - Shut Down
> THRITS - Shut Down
> TREAT - Shut Down
> ZPPR - Zero Power Physics Reactor (formerly Zero Power Plutonium Reactor) - Standby
> ZPR-III - Shut Down

Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico
> UHTREX - Shut Down
> Omega West - Shut Down
> Clementine - Shut Down

Nevada Test Site, Nevada
> BREN Tower

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee
> X-10 Graphite Reactor - Shut Down, Operated 1943-1963
> Homogeneous Reactor Experiment (HRE) - Shut down, Operated 1952-1954
> Homogeneous Reactor Test (HRT) - Shut down, Operated 1957-1961
> Aircraft Reactor Experiment (ARE) - Shutdown, Operated 1954-1955
> Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) - Shut Down, Operated 1965-1969
> Health Physics Research Reactor (HPRR) - Shut down, Operated 1963-1987
> Low-Intensity Test Reactor (LITR)- Shut down, Operated 1950-1968
> Bulk Shielding Reactor (BSR) - Shut Down, Operated 1950-1987
> Geneva Conference Reactor - Shutdown, Operated 1955
> Tower Shielding Reactor-I (TSR-I) - Shut Down, Operated 1954-1958
> Tower Shielding Reactor-II (TSR-II) - Shutdown, Operated 1958-1982
> Oak Ridge Research Reactor (ORR) - Shut Down, Operated 1958-1987
> High Flux Isotope Reactor - Operational, Started 1965
> Pool Critical Assembly - Shutdown, Operated 1958 - 1987
> Experimental Gas Cooled Reactor (EGCR) - Constructed, but never operated (project canceled in 1966)

Savannah River Site, South Carolina
> HWCTR - Heavy Water Components Test Reactor - Partial Decommissioning

Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Simi Hills California
> Sodium Reactor Experiment (Accident 1959, Closed 1964)

This one is especially interesting, if only in its implications for splash-down - like in Las Vegas ...
> SNAP-10A - Shut Down 1965, presently orbiting

Here's 32 more 'Civilian Research and Test Reactors' to add to the ever-growing list of 'Covert Nukes."

Under Decommission Orders or License Amendments
(These research and test reactors are authorized to decontaminate and dismantle their facility to prepare for final survey and license termination.)
* General Atomics, San Diego, California (two reactors)
* National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Sandusky, Ohio (two reactors)
* University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois
* University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

With Possession-Only Licenses
(These research and test reactors are not authorized to operate the reactor, only to possess the nuclear material on-hand. They are permanently shut down.)
* General Electric Company, Sunol, California (two research and test reactors, one power reactor)
* Nuclear Ship Savannah, James River Reserve Fleet, Virginia (one power reactor)
* University at Buffalo
* U.S. Veterans Administration, Omaha, NE
* Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA

External links
* DoE list
* ICJT list - includes the defunct

Has anyone been counting? How many does that add up to?

Whatever the total number of these ‘deadly neighbor forever’ nuclear facilities adds up to, it’s way too many.

Our friend, Ken, ModernSurvivalBlog, nails the ‘what if’ scenario quite succinctly less than two weeks after the (ongoing) Fukushima disaster/fiasco changed the world forever.

March 24, 2011

"What if a Carrington Event solar flare were to occur, like what had happened in 1859?

Astrophysicists know that it WILL happen again, it’s just a matter of when. If an extreme solar event like that were to take down the electrical power grid, and-or damage electronic systems from its EMP effects, how long would it be before any, some, most, or all of these nuclear power plants would runaway to meltdown?

What if a true EMP weapon, or weapons, were to detonate and take down all electrical systems of a region, or wider, what then?

Are the backup generators and their associated electrical control systems impervious to EMP-type effects for example?

What about the control systems of the reactors themselves, are they EMP-proof?

What if the New Madrid fault zone were to unleash a magnitude 9+ earthquake, which geologists agree is possible, then how would the nuclear plants avoid catastrophe at the reactors in northern Arkansas, eastern Missouri, or others nearby?

What if the San Andreas tears loose in California, how will Diablo Canyon and San Onofre handle it?

What if there is an unforeseen ‘physical’ attack on one of these reactors?

What can the containment vessels withstand with regards to missiles of various strengths?

What if there is a cyber ‘virus’ attack along the lines of the Stuxnet computer virus that attacked the Iranian nuclear development facilities?

These simple questions led me to create a map of all U.S. nuclear reactors, both operational and decommissioned, so to have a look see where the danger zones ‘might’ be, should a worst-case-scenario occur.

It is difficult to impossible to answer the question, “How far away is a safe distance from a nuclear reactor?”, so I’ve created 100 mile radius zones (200 mile diameter) around each nuclear plant to provide some visual perspective. Yellow zones are around decommissioned plants.

Remember, it’s all about the wind direction too. The prevailing winds in the US are typically from west to east while normally dipping down into the south-central U.S. before bending back up the east coast.

Looking at the map density of the circle zones, I’m glad I’m out West."

The federal government recently sponsored a detailed scientific study to better understand how much critical components of our national electrical power grid might be affected by either a naturally occurring GMD or a man-made EMP."

"Under the auspices of the EMP Commission and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and reviewed in depth by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the National Academy of Sciences, Metatech Corporation undertook extensive modeling and analysis of the potential effects of extreme geomagnetic storms on the US electrical power grid.

Based upon a storm as intense as the 1921 storm, Metatech estimated that within the United States, induced voltage and current spikes, combined with harmonic anomalies, would severely damage or destroy over 350 EHV power transformers critical to the functioning of the US grid and possibly impact well over 2000 EHV transformers worldwide.

EHV transformers are made-to-order and custom-designed for each installation, each weighing as much as 300 tons and costing well over $1 million.

"Given that there is currently a three-year waiting list for a single EHV transformer (due to recent demand from China and India, lead times grew from one to three years), and that the total global manufacturing capacity is roughly 100 EHV transformers per year when the world's manufacturing centers are functioning properly, you can begin to grasp the implications of widespread transformer losses."

Report of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack

[color=aqua]What do extended grid blackouts have to do with potential nuclear catastrophes?

Nuclear power plants are designed to disconnect automatically from the grid in the event of a local power failure or major grid anomaly; once disconnected, they begin the process of shutting down the reactor's core.

In the event of the loss of coolant flow to an active nuclear reactor's core, the reactor will start to melt down and fail catastrophically within a matter of a few hours, at most.

In an extreme GMD,
nearly every reactor in the world
could be affected.

How many people live near a nuclear power plant in the USA?

It is true that the NRC has worked hard against the burden of purchasing, storing, and maintaining a fresh supply of KI (potassium iodide) for those populations closest to nuclear reactors.

In 2009, the NRC actually canceled its policy on KI distribution, stating that it was unnecessary, as it did not protect against all radionuclides that could be potentially released, would cause undue stress on the community, and would delay critical response time by adding more duties to local, state and federal staff.

Does “undue stress on the community” trump the invisible, slow death by fallout?

One might surmise that amongst a host of other government travesties, RICO statutes were also violated, so now would be the time for the US Attorney General to step in and protect us - we, the people, of the United States of America.

However, Eric H. Holder is probably in on it.

Unfortunately, it is painfully obvious that ‘Fast-N-Furious Slippery Eric’ will not take any action against his cohorts here.

Starting at the top, the most prestigious office in the land, the President of the United States, we are continuing to witness corruption at the highest level - government agencies hiding the truth and deliberately deceiving the public - designed to disenfranchise American citizens of the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness - not to mention the implementation of mass genocide here in the homeland and worldwide.

This fish stinks from head to tail!

Interestingly enough, and surely by co-inkydink, the Qur’an burnings in Afghanistan were taking place and hogging the MSM headlines and ‘face time’ just as these documents were being made public.

It should be no surprise that the corporate controlled mainstream media is ignoring this blockbuster revelation even now instead of exposing it and demanding an investigation.

Issa calls Obama admin. ‘the most corrupt government in history’

“If they reported to the White House and the White House did nothing, shame on the White House,” he said. “But even if they didn’t report to the White House, we still have to say,

"Why weren’t they doing their job of protecting the American people?"

Fukushima now radiating everyone: 'Unspeakable' reality

Just as Australia's SBS exposed in depth the reality of the 2010 BP Gulf of Mexico catastrophe unlike any U.S. mainstream news station, Sunday, Australia's CBS has now exposed in depth the Fukushima catastrophe.

The Fukushima crisis is far from over. The crippled nuclear power plant is still leaking; and, judging from Chernobyl, recovery will not be measured in years, more like centuries," reported the Australian presenter Liz Hayes.

Australia's CBS exposed the "unspeakable" realities of the Japanese catastrophe in its 60 Minutes program Sunday night during which leading nuclear scientist Dr. Michio Kaku said

radiation from Fukushima will impact of all of humanity.

The nuclear energy power industry violation of the right to health is apparent throughout the new Australian report.

"In fact, the whole world will be exposed from the radiation from Fukushima,"
Dr. Kaku told CBS reporter Liz Hayes.

Dr. Kaku told Hayes,

"If you've been exposed to Cesium because you're a nuclear power worker, even after your long dead and buried, your grave site will be radioactive."

"Your great grand kids can come to your grave site with a Geiger counter and see that great granddaddy still has radiation at his grave site."

Intrepid reporter Hayes continues,

“The human face of this dreadful situation can be seen in shelters in public buildings. It’s where you’ll find families, old and young, struggling to retrieve their lives - a near impossibility when all you have is a cardboard box to mark out your spot, your home.

I don’t know how Japan will recover, and how these refugees will survive.

Like Chernobyl,
Fukushima could well
become a dead zone,
where no one will
ever be able to return.”

edit on 25/10/2012 by thorfourwinds because: color
do not circumvent character limits in posts!!!
edit on Fri Oct 26 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)

+10 more 
posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 01:18 PM

Originally posted by thorfourwinds
continued Fukushima radiation pollution
deadly radioactive plume
a massive radiation plume that struck the West Coast

According to the map, the US, particularly the West Coast and particularly California may be more contaminated with radioactive cesium than the western half of Japan or Hokkaido.

Puzzled by the argument going on here.

Why is that one needs to refer to "secret documents" to determine the amount of radiation exposure.
Given that all sorts of radiation detection equipment is perfectly legal and easy to purchase if you've got a small number of dollars (eg, build your own for $30), how could one assert any kind of cover up?

Why not just walk outside and do a measurement yourself?

Is it ...
a. Too lazy, surfing the net is easier
b. Actual real measurenments simply dont show a doomsday occuring

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 01:27 PM
When Radiation Hit in that great of a concentration and numbers there was no where to hid for anybody.The entire Northern Hemisphere was hit with it and continues to be hit with it. Nothing could of been done because of the speed in which it hit the atmosphere and spread. The only thing that can be done is to move everybody to Antartica. Southern Hemisphere is the only place where a person would avoid the Radiation. That being said how do the World Governments move over 8 Billion people to Antartica. Antartica's temperatures fall to -60 in the Winter. They still can't move everybody to Antartica. I guess you could voluntarily move there. Good luck to you. There's no way of avoiding this problem and its too late for the blame game.Its just like everything else that can potentially destroy us. If there's nothing that can be done why tell everybody. There would be anarchy and I myself would rather not know than have anarchy. It happened so take your Lugol's Iodine and make the best of it. Live each day like its your last and enjoy it.

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 02:12 PM
reply to post by thorfourwinds


it's a con alright
brought to you by the fracking industry
dont be fooled

Here is a link to a Tokyo radiation monitoring site located in the Shinjuku area. Note that the highest reading occurred briefly on March 15, but quickly returned to near- normal levels for every day since. This chart covers up to March 19, but you can access the latest chart by visiting the link.

Fukushima Radiation Fear Mongering: An Orchestrated Scare Campaign Exceeding the Fraud of 9/11

probable increase in radiation
which will of course be blamed on fukushima

Spy Satellite Fell From Orbit October 17, 2012 from ZS Livingstone (Oct. 22, 2012)

[Editor's Note: The military doesn't want us to know that they use spy satellites with nuclear power reactors, so when they decay and break up while coming down to earth, they get the media and their BS artists in officialdom to spin yarns about falling meteors. While the Illuminati manufactures radiation hysteria about Fukushima which doesn't actually exist (in order to scare people away from nuclear power and into the arms of natural gas producers), they never tell you about these hidden sources of ionizing radiation. ZS says that while it's possible that plutonium was involved with this satellite, it's more likely a less dangerous isotope like thorium . ..Ken]

edit on Fri Oct 26 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: quote edit per poster request

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 02:15 PM
reply to post by alfa1


for once we agree

did you know ben fullford agrees with us and is dishing out the same advice?

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 09:02 PM
If you go to you can find pictures of workers fixing up the Fukushima reactors, including reactor 4

Here are some links. You can see workers on reactor 4... It leads mee to believe the extent of the damage is exaggerated.

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 09:31 PM
Man is subconsciously bent on self destruction..

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 10:03 PM
So, let me get this straight...

We're screwed, right?

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 10:11 PM
This is one of the most informative and well put together threads I have seen on ATS. I have had my own concerns about how I have thought that something was being deliberately understated and hidden about the true radiation aftermath of the Fukishima disaster in 2011. I have read articles on how milk had been tested at 2000% higher than EPA maximum allowable limits. Star and flag. Very telling and interesting.

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 10:13 PM
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 10:23 PM
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 10:24 PM
I'm going to suggest that besides the health issues, the weather has been permanently altered as a result of the plume.

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 11:06 PM
Thank you for your post, however, here's the real question.

What is your purpose?
Just what answer do you have for the government?
How would YOU supply the nation's energy needs?

These reactors can not just be "shut down." They are there, and will remain just so, long into the future until such time comes that a new means of safety measure is set in place where we may do these types of things you're loudly demanding. Scaring people serves no purpose. Some of what you've said is true, a larger portion of it, however again, is very exaggerated.

You put down the way we are doing things but offer no real solution yourself. I never endorse these types of threads. All they do is cause fear, anger, and uncertainty. No matter how many graphical portrayals you present of the situation at hand, it doesn't change things one bit.
edit on 25-10-2012 by SoulVisions because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 11:13 PM
Thanks for the info.

It all seems pretty plausable to me. Makes a lot of sense really.

S + F for you

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 11:45 PM
I love the title! (it is catchy.

Thank you for taking the time and effort to create such an amazing thread.

You know I expected as much about the fuk-u-shima thing.

The first thing that caught my attention was how quickly the lame stream media dropped the story. For days it was virtually all you could find on CNN or Foxnews then one day nothing - nada.

I can't remember the last time I've heard anything from the LSM about this not even an update telling people how everything is going to be okay.

So who gave the order to keep this quiet?

Who or what on our planet has the ability to silence the world leaders and the mass media?

edit on 25-10-2012 by cavalryscout because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 11:46 PM
I spare most of my time between Japan and LA, and there`s nothing wrong with the radiation levels here.

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 11:47 PM
Not sure what to make of your assessment, but I will definitely give you an A for effort!

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 11:49 PM
Nice thread layout.

Although I am a bit skeptical on the severity of the situation.

I am not doudting that we got a little Japan is a long ways away. Just like Chernobyl. Did Russia evacuate everybody thousands of miles away?

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 11:53 PM

Originally posted by liejunkie01
Although I am a bit skeptical on the severity of the situation

Me too since I live in Vancouver and haven't heard a word about the radiation here.

part of the coverup I would assume, but what are the short-term effects?

I imagine being where I am, that they would start soon if at all?

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 11:55 PM
reply to post by thorfourwinds

Hey thorfourwinds... long time no hear. Good work as usual. Must to keep this in the light of day. Everyone is so Fuku'd out and the media tells us nothing. I thought I would bring some data about pollution that already regularly arrives on the West Coast of the US. This includes dust from sandstorms in China, coal dust from smokestacks and even Lead particles. Here are a couple links for people to read about "ordinary" pollution travelling all that ways.

Thanks for putting in the work to make everyone more aware.

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in