It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


What the Human race could look like in 3012 OMG!!

page: 6
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 04:22 PM

Originally posted by Putyournamehere
Sounds like we are evolving into grays.

The link and content within portrayed quite the opposite.

I don't subscribe to the belief that we are the "Greys" in the future. I think they are either:

a) E.T.

b) E.T. created androids for scouting and maitenance purposes

c) A form of multi dimensional being, possibly a form of incarnation of human beings after death.

I'd also like to add that some times the phenotype (outward appearance) of species remains the same for thousands, if not millions of years, due to a plateau or "achieved perfection" state.

For example, sharks have changed over the last 400 million years, but there are plenty of specie of shark that have looked remarkably similar to modern day sharks, but from hundreds of millions of years ago.

Besides, our understanding of evolution, and especially where we're going, is very mysterious. We still think we evolved from "Homo Erectus" from some 1.5 million to 300,000 years ago. Do you realize how incredible of a change that is, in such a short amount of time??
edit on 25-10-2012 by Soloro because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 04:28 PM
we will not have the same eyes then. how do we know no what we will look like to people a thousand years ago, now...we might see in infrared, and perceive in a 3d construct.

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 04:31 PM
I'm sorry but that picture looks more like Uncle Fester evolved into a Z-tardet beast...not a human being.

edit on 25-10-2012 by PurpleVortex because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 05:57 PM
reply to post by FeelingPure

indeed, that's what "humans" will look like in 200 yrs
if GMO's, flouride and the other poisons they try to shove in to us aren't banned NOW!!!

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 06:11 PM

Small brains - Check!

Saggy Necks - Check!

Small Balls - Check!

In the year 3012......we'll all be French!

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 06:13 PM
Looks like my cousin Fred in Alabama!

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 06:14 PM
Pic looks like my ex wife's father.

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 06:16 PM
Idiocracy anyone?


posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 06:41 PM
you do realise the sun publication is the source with the most elvis sightings right?

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 07:08 PM
reply to post by FeelingPure

Our most used extremities will change dramatically. ARMS AND FINGERS get longer to reduce the need to reach too far and nerve endings in hands and fingers will increase because of the greater use of devices such as iPhones that need complex eye-hand coordination.

Read more:

yes because i-phones will be around 1000 years from now lol this article is complete trash evolution of hands because of gadgets. I guess the hammer caused an evolution as well lol. NO it didn't huh wow

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 09:54 PM
We are self evolving..what we will look like in 1k years won't be up to natural evolution by then. Outside of catastrophic events (meteor slamming us all back into the stone age or worse), then it is almost as likely we will exist closer to a cybernetic organism that is ageless and pretty much any form we choose...when we decide to take physical form anyhow.


posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 09:57 PM
reply to post by FeelingPure

It's The Sun.

Bueller? Bueller? Did you even look at the source?

posted on Oct, 25 2012 @ 10:12 PM
Hah! The way things are going I could see this happening, and honestly, that disturbs me.

edit on 25-10-2012 by Doomcake because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 26 2012 @ 12:17 AM
That article has to be satire right? If not, they are grossly misunderstanding evolution. Modern humans go back 30,000 years or so, and you could even argue 200,000 although there are slight differences between modern and archaic. There's no way a human will change that much in just 1000 years. It would take hundreds of thousands of years and drastic environmental changes.

posted on Oct, 26 2012 @ 12:17 AM
double post. sorry.
edit on 26-10-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 26 2012 @ 01:46 PM

Originally posted by zonetripper2065
More proof Mr H>P Lovecraft was a time traveler, this poor soul suffers the "Innsmouth look"

GASP please do not insult my people like that. the deep ones are a proud inteligent and NOT dependent on technology like your human race is.

posted on Oct, 26 2012 @ 01:55 PM
Screw ya all I'm gonna evolve into this!

posted on Oct, 26 2012 @ 04:31 PM
reply to post by Upthepunx

As you type away on your keyboard

posted on Oct, 26 2012 @ 04:52 PM

Originally posted by antar
reply to post by TheLaughingGod

If I am correct in that they were human time travelers, they dressed in black military uniforms. They were both male and female, looked just like we do. Healthy, trim, normal.

Interesting stuff, makes me think of Stargate SG1, have you written about this more extensively here on ATS before? Knowledge gleaned from the experience?

Originally posted by john_bmth

Originally posted by TheLaughingGod
reply to post by antar

Could you describe how those time travellers looked then?

Only on ATS could this question be posed earnestly

I know a lot of things to be true, things that are viewed as crazy and impossible by conventional wisdom and science, so while I haven't had any direct experiences relating to time travel I wouldn't be arrogant enough to proclaim what is or isn't true or possible in that regard, I can't dictate the reality of Antar's experience.

What can I say, weird things happen, and to suppose that you know something to not be true just because you think it's 'far out' or impossible is narrow minded in my opinion, who's to say what's far out anyway, our knowledge and our subjective experience in relation to the universe and the nature of reality is so limited it's laughable.

I don't take the information at face value, it's interesting information, something to ponder, might be true, could be false.

posted on Oct, 26 2012 @ 05:26 PM
reply to post by TheLaughingGod

In the distant past I may have dropped a line or two about it but with no real interest I just kept it more private. Seems many of the real reasons I came to find ATS in the first place and to learn more about, are subjects that either get ignored or freak people out to much to discuss.

Life is much different for me now and yet I feel as if perhaps others would have an advantage if they encounter similar occurrences through what I have to teach. The debunkers just keep reality at bay when they shouldn't.

top topics

<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in