Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Meteor? Or...

page: 3
12
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:31 PM
link   
reply to post by CLPrime
 


The individual spikes are something right?



When it spikes up to white?
edit on 23-10-2012 by timetothink because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:33 PM
link   
Another one.




posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:35 PM
link   
reply to post by CLPrime
 


weather are you sure? no storm in england bro..
www.bbc.co.uk...

So What??????



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:35 PM
link   
reply to post by CLPrime
 


weather are you sure? no storm in england bro..
Weather Warning
Wednesday 24th October
There are no weather warnings currently in force across the UK.
Valid until further notice.
Flood Warning
Wednesday 24th October
There are no flood warnings currently in force anywhere in the United Kingdom.
Further updates will appear here.

www.bbc.co.uk...

So What??????


edit on 23-10-2012 by cheesy because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:39 PM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 


As I've already said, the level at which the Troposphere is reflecting Meteorscan's source signal can't be expected to stay constant. It's going to spike at times, while subsiding at other times. These spikes just means higher Troposphere reflectivity.

Though, there may very well be the occasional meteor mixed in there, though they will always spike perpendicular to the false return we're seeing (meaning they cover a broader range of frequencies).



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:40 PM
link   
reply to post by cheesy
 


Not weather weather. Tropospheric weather. Greater temperature differential, things of that nature.



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:40 PM
link   
reply to post by CLPrime
 




though they will always spike perpendicular to the false return we're seeing (meaning they cover a broader range of frequencies).

A couple of which have occurred while this thread has been in progress.



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Yes sir. Which is why I added that in there. I noticed them between fits of hysteria.



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:48 PM
link   
reply to post by JrDavis
 


is quite so far right now, they said this event was an aftershock of the main event on past september, but the weird thing is that we have had like 80 aftershock or more, also OVSICORI downgrade the earthquake to 5.6 but USGS still showing up as 6.5...



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:50 PM
link   
I went ahead and "star and flagged" this. I think it's important for people who look at raw data to know what it is they are looking at (yes I know raw data looks a lot different, but still)

This information looks like something BIG is happening, but in truth it's a common signal.



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:53 PM
link   
I am not being hysterical, I am trying to learn something new and its exciting to me.

I just want to know if all these spikes are false positives.



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:55 PM
link   
There's another one all the way to white.

Some of them have to be something.



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:55 PM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 


Not your hysteria, my hysteria. It comes and goes with the spikes on that graph.



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:55 PM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 

Spikes which show no change in frequency are false returns.
Spikes which show a change in frequency are not.



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:56 PM
link   
reply to post by CLPrime
 


Sorry, thought you meant me.




posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Is the change in frequency when it appears to move left to right on the graph?


I'm not sure how to explain it....it appears on graph as a spike, then appears a couple seconds later in a different spot on graph.

edit on 23-10-2012 by timetothink because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 11:58 PM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 

Yes.
It's too bad we can't select different or clearer representations (can we?). A simple frequency/time display might be easier to read.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I think I get it, a couple of them did that.

I am better at seeing than hearing when learning.

Wish I could post the screen grabs...



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:08 AM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 
If I'm understanding this correctly, (...and please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here), what they are saying is that that outbound signal is being reflected back into the receiver by the atmospheric weather. That is why its showing up so strongly only on the frequency that they are sending out, with nothing appearing on the other frequencies. If it was hitting an actual object, which caused the frequency to “Doppler shift”, then you would see it show up on the other frequency bands as well. As there is no object, its only an “atmospheric bounce” or “reflection”, there is no speed, thus no shift, so it's returning only on the one frequency that was sent out by the transmitter.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:10 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Phage how can you tell what is a meteor and what is a false reading.

Are the false readings the ones that are identical. The blip or sudden increase could be a meteor?

Side Note - Also would you mind looking at the seismic activity?
earthquake.usgs.gov...
Id also like to be able to read this and know if it's normal or not normal for the readings to be the way they are.

Thanks.






top topics



 
12
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join


Help ATS Recover with your Donation.
read more: Help ATS Recover With Your Contribution