It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Otts
Grady - your contemplating severing relationships with members of your family who would have voted for Kerry shows exactly what I fear - that the next President, be it Bush or Kerry, will have an incredibly tough time, because a portion of the population won't recognize him as their legitimate leader.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I have no qualms about limiting the interaction with others who have voted for Kerry to the most minimal manner as possible.
However, if Bush wins, I think then you will see what real national division is really all about.
And that's a prediction.
Originally posted by edsinger
Originally posted by GradyPhilpottI would have to reconsider all personal relationships, including those of my family.
You are going to get hammered for that one so I will share the load m8, I would also feel that way...I posted the jist of the conversation with my mother....Even she understands what is at stake here.
Actually, we really don't need a teenage foreinger to glibly comment of the internal affairs of our nation or the personal decisions of our citizenry. My suggestion is infinitely more complex than you understand, but those who read my words and do understand, will instictively know how to conduct their lives and relationships.
Originally posted by Otts
while the same number of Democrats will not recognize Bush as their President -
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
As for all this infantile garbage about Kerry being a traitor? LMAO!
[edit on 20-10-2004 by sminkeypinkey]
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
I think GradyPhilpott, edsinger, and intelearthling emphasized it the best:
Either you agree with them, or you suck # and are worthless.
And that is no joke.
Originally posted by Intelearthling
Liberals=Traitors=Communists=Pacifists=Cowards=Anti-Americans=The Enemy=Al-Quada=French=Yellow-backs=Cry-babies=Low-lifes=Criminals
Originally posted by Intelearthling
Liberals=Traitors=Communists=Pacifists=Cowards=Anti-Americans=The Enemy=Al-Quada=French=Yellow-backs=Cry-babies=Low-lifes=Criminals
Originally posted by Intelearthling
Liberals=Traitors=Communists=Pacifists=Cowards=Anti-Americans=The Enemy=Al-Quada=French=Yellow-backs=Cry-babies=Low-lifes=Criminals
Originally posted by edsinger
Originally posted by Intelearthling
Liberals=Traitors=Communists=Pacifists=Cowards=Anti-Americans=The Enemy=Al-Quada=French=Yellow-backs=Cry-babies=Low-lifes=Criminals
Forgot some:
Treehuggers=politicians=lawyers=Democrats
Originally posted by Durden
Treehuggers=politicians=lawyers=Democrats
Well since you agree with him, why don't you answer my question, edsinger?
Originally posted by edsinger
Originally posted by Durden
Treehuggers=politicians=lawyers=Democrats
Well since you agree with him, why don't you answer my question, edsinger?
Because it is obvious from the other thread you need to be repeated to a lot...waste of time really.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
It is inevitable that a very large segment of the American population will vote for a traitor and avowed war criminal on November 2nd, 2004. What we are to call those who will do so would probably be best addressed on a case by case basis. It would be unfair to lump the merely stupid in with the traitors.