It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ColonelSF
Originally posted by ManFromEurope
Next: Moondust and traces in the dust.
The dust of the moon will be caused to raise by walking on it.
It will not be blown away, as there is no atmosphere, therefore no wind on the moon.
Therefore it will settle around the steps of the walking person, the radius of its settlement depending on the force with which is was raised. The heavier parts will stay closer to the footstep, the lighter particles will be thrown away for a greater distance, leaving a smudged area around each footstep.
It is of no doubt for me that these dust-particles could cover the tracks of the moon-rover.
Then what do you say about this image? Where are the tire marks of the rover on the surface? But the footprints around are clearly visible? The rover is much heavier and therefore all the more reason for its tracks to be clearly etched on the surface. (Or was the rover lowered by crane? )
Hackaday.com
Originally posted by smurfy
Originally posted by ColonelSF
Originally posted by ManFromEurope
Next: Moondust and traces in the dust.
The dust of the moon will be caused to raise by walking on it.
It will not be blown away, as there is no atmosphere, therefore no wind on the moon.
Therefore it will settle around the steps of the walking person, the radius of its settlement depending on the force with which is was raised. The heavier parts will stay closer to the footstep, the lighter particles will be thrown away for a greater distance, leaving a smudged area around each footstep.
It is of no doubt for me that these dust-particles could cover the tracks of the moon-rover.
Then what do you say about this image? Where are the tire marks of the rover on the surface? But the footprints around are clearly visible? The rover is much heavier and therefore all the more reason for its tracks to be clearly etched on the surface. (Or was the rover lowered by crane? )
Hackaday.com
The fender repairs you can see indicates this as Apollo 17. Apollo 16 had similar damage but wasn't repaired.
Originally posted by r2d246
Look lets face it, we all have our points of view. We're just here to debat what we believe. No one can ever be 100% certain of what happend. All you can do is interpret the facts. And maybe one day the truth will come out beyond all this back and forth. My biggest challenge is I know TPTB are theives, liars, evil, and have proven that time and time again. But now we're to believe that they came threw for us? That they didn't fake this to steal the 100 billion it cost? You got to be kidding me. Just way too many obvious flaws in the filming and photos. I'm sorry but my wager is on the idea that it was a fake.
edit on 22-10-2012 by r2d246 because: (no reason given)edit on 22-10-2012 by r2d246 because: (no reason given)
What strikes me as odd, given this particular photograph, is the fact that the boot imprints appear to be much deeper than the rover tracks. Especially because the rover drove with an astronaut on top ...
Originally posted by rollsthepaul
You will have your answer, when you view Jay Wiedner's documentary "Kubrick's Odyssey". It can be obtained as a torrent. No need to guess.
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by r2d246
And my money is squarely on the truth, they landed, six times, and each of these six times men from earth walked, hopped and skipped on the the moon, and you are welcome to believe in a fantasy if you want, because you plainly don't believe in looking at facts.
edit on 22-10-2012 by seabhac-rua because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by zatara
Its my personal belief that something fishy had been going on during the Apollo project....Too many people got lethal "accidents", too many questionable photographs and hardware design.
The first landings were during an administration with a president who did cheat and had low moral and ethic standards. Nixon would without reserve lie and manipulate the US population for personal gain and satisfaction.
The masonic rituals and freemason members attached to the Apollo project. And not to forget the NAZI factor.
And then there is Kubrick....I am still asking myself why this man has the appearance of telling a second, hidden story underneat the movies he directed:
The latter does in my logic make the most sense....But if true it would raise many other questions...it would mean an uncertain voyage into a dark smelly rabbithole.
Originally posted by r2d246
- How did they keep the film from frying when it went threw the van allen belt?
- How did the keep the film from getting ruined in the extreme tempuratures?
- How did they go to the bathroom during the journey?
- How did a 2k CPU provide all the computing power to allow the lunar modual to complete every function in had to operate and do it timely enough to ensure pinpoint accuracy.
- How did these flimsy space suits keep them from freezing or burning up?
- how did they get the reverse thrusters to land the lander everytime like it was nothing, where on earth it was a complete failure.
- When the lander blasted off the moon why isn't there any dust or hardly any, when a thurst that powerful should raise a massive debree cloud?
The ones you've asked are trivial and have been answered many times.
I mean there's a million questions,
Originally posted by Phage
But why not exert some effort of your own and do some research before asking any more?