reply to post by DestroyDestroyDestroy
So if put in the same situation you would simply lay down a die? would you want help?
i suppose you would stand bravely at the muzzle of that AK and die for the actions of others?
this isn't about blowing up the entire area, its about why with FAST action teams and
the modern military communications more wasn't done with troops in a more timely
i can tell you flat out that having been there myself, i sure as hell didn't think anything
of the problems the US gov had with the gov of Nicaragua at the time, also i had
no blood on my hands from that situation either, i was doing charity work, with dentists
and doctors, free medical care. i was a translator for these people who gave and
expected nothing in return and did not receive anything in return.
but do you honestly think those who will harm others over their political views or
some sense of revenge are justified simply because others made poor choices?
its always wrong to murder people, no matter who is doing it. if we cannot stand
up against that then why even bother? i don't support war mongering but i sure
as H E double Hokey sticks don't support allowing U.S. ambassadors being murdered
because of something someone else did.
most ambassadors are innocent people working hard to keep relations with the
countries they are assigned to peaceful. it sickens me to see someone saying this
could somehow be OK because of other issues with a country. does that mean
that since say the EU has also been involved in some of these wars i could
mosey on down to any of their embassy's and just kill some workers?