Originally posted by maxella1
You are replying to a thread with a title "Are Our Leaders Really Incompetent … Or Just Pretending?" arguing that the Government is really so incompetent that it is simply impossible that they conspired to attack on 9/11. So forgive me for assuming that you believe the terrorists used the incompetence to their advantage...
I already gave my opinion about this earlier in this thread. You don't need to assume, you just need to read.
You also talk about evidence that support the OS all the time, some of the evidence that we are expected to accept are the ground zero passport, the red bandana and the suitcase that was left behind. So common sense suggests that you accept these as evidence...
Maybe you should rely less on your common sense then, and stick with the facts instead.
Why do you reply to a thread and expect me to ask you what you believe? I don't care what you believe but I care why you disagree with what I believe, so far you did not even try to explain it with anything other than repeating that what I think happened is unrealistic and impossible.
I don't expect you to ask what I believe, but you are complaining that I am not sharing what I believe. You wrote "Well that's the thing... I'm not sure what you claim except that everybody is wrong and you are right.". I gave you advice of how to solve this "thing", but if you don't care what I believe anyhow, there isn't even a thing to begin with.
Dealing with you is like dealing with a vending machine, nothing comes out until you press a friggin button... So I would appreciate it if you finally decide to state what exactly you think happened.
Huh? You don't care what I believe but at the same time you do appreciate it when I state what I think happened exactly?
I am not shy to share what I think, but please be more specific what you want to know.
LOL that's nonsense... FEMA's Center for Domestic Preparedness scheduled a drill and sent people to NYC to set it up but plans changed on 9/11. Why would they need to know anything other than that they were getting ready for 9/12 drill? Is it really so difficult for you to understand or is the "_____ had to be in on it" all that you have left?
I can't help that you ignore the consequences of your conspiracy theory. Yes, people at OEM had to be aware of the conspiracy, else they would not have a reason to plan that drill on that day. Its not all that I have left, but it is on extreme large hole in your conspiracy theory.
First I would never knowingly be a part of an inside job. But if I was investigating the crime of the century I would definitely research similar events in history and the character of people of interest. Known and proven liars have zero credibility with me and giving them the benefit of a doubt is not an option in this case. If you had been caught lying to save your ass in the past you wouldn't get the benefit of a doubt from anybody who wanted to talk to you regarding a crime.
So you decided not to give an honest answer to my question but instead ignore it.
So you believe that this piece of evidence from United 93 proves that one of the terrorists was on the plane?
And with a straight face you're telling me that what I believe is unrealistic and impossible? Or are you laughing your ass off like I am?
See my previous post to see what I think about the evidence. It seems to me you already read it as you replied to it. But read it again, and you probably would not need to ask this question.
I agree it wouldn't change anything except that it raises a red flag that the evidence might be fake and if that's true we have a big problem don't you think so? And just a few posts back you stated that it is possible that the FBI would try to cover up their incompetence.. So is the FBI in on it too?
According to your theory, yes, FBI is in on it. And you agree they didn't have any significant function. They were just in on it for the fun of it. The more people in your conspiracy the merrier.
You smell red flag I smell bs.
edit on 10-11-2012 by -PLB- because: (no reason given)