It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rolfharriss
Building one for yourself is no problem
Anyone who admits to having one running in their own home puts themselves in grave danger. Catch 22.
If you even said you knew someone who had one running you put them in danger too.
You fully understand that the next bubble is wireless energy. Free energy is scheduled in for 20 years time.
People who want to build one themselves should, but selling them on is a problem so I suggest selling them at cost to get enough out there for word to get out.
The claims of these "designs" violate the laws of physics so bringing up the laws of physics is very much appropriate, especially in the science forum.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Explain how this thread is science.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Again none of the designs violate any current understood laws of physics so yes it is off topic.
If you want to pick one of the designs study it and give an analysis of it that would be on topic.
But just coming on here and making a blanket statement that they all won't work or violates physics laws without having even examined them is not helpful and off topic.
Can we have one thread that is not derailed by rehashing the same old arguments that really are not relevant to this thread? Thanks.
I don't know how many times this needs to be explained to you but getting more energy out to do work than is put in in a perpetually sustained manner is a violation of the laws of physics, so if anything your thread is not appropriate for the SciTech forum considering a) your thread contains no science or objective evidence to counter contemporary scientific understandings and b) you are adamant about not discussing or learning science in any shape or form.
Originally posted by rolfharriss
Lighten up John it was just a joke.
We don't need to argue on here, if we were sat having a cup of tea it would be a polite chat..
It does look a little suspect as why it would offend you so much to even discuss the exploration of exploiting the properties of magnets to produce energy in new and inventive ways. This is a positive thing, we should all become scientists and get experimenting. It is a cheap trick to break off any discussion of the possibilities of free energy.. by twisting it into a conflict and stifling open free exchange of ideas and possibilities.
We all respect that you do not want to discuss anything outside the narrow parameters of mainstream science.
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by hawkiye
Perpeptual motion violates the laws of physics. The site in your op makes specific claims about perpeptual motion. This is not a tough concept to grasp.