It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by alfa1
What about shut the hell up?
The noPhoto isn't available just yet!
Contribute to our indiegogo campaign to secure yourself the first spot in line and to help us get the noPhoto in your hands as soon as possible.
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by SpearMint
Well, its a bit more complicated than that.
First, the government is claiming that the cameras are there for safety, yet some studies have shown that they have actually increased accidents.
People are of the opinion that they are there to simply generate revenue, which is clearly NOT the purpose of the police.
Lastly, a person receives a fine in the mail, so there is no presumption of innocence. This notion that the camera is infallible. There is a presumption of guilt, which contradicts our justice system.
edit on 21-10-2012 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by alfa1
What about the old fashioned option of NOT running red lights?
Originally posted by SilentKoala
And intentionally endangering the lives of others in those situations where it's less safe to come to a screeching stop when the light turns yellow 100 meters in front of you and the roads are wet. You either slam the brakes and risk spinning out
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by SilentKoala
And intentionally endangering the lives of others in those situations where it's less safe to come to a screeching stop when the light turns yellow 100 meters in front of you and the roads are wet. You either slam the brakes and risk spinning out
If you have to risk "spinning out" or "screeching" to a stop on a wet road, then its clear that you are not driving safely according to the weather conditions.
In all my years of driving I have NEVER seen a yellow light set up in such a way that it doesnt give an alert driver a safe opportunity to stop.
There is no presumption of innocence in motor vehicle violations; that "innocent until proven guilty" only counts in criminal cases. Have you ever noticed that if/when you get a speeding ticket you have to pay the fine unless you can prove you are innocent?
Jonathan Dandrow has developed noPhoto, which renders the pix snapped by those revenue-generating robo-cams useless. The technology behind noPhoto is fairly simple. At the top of the gadget, which doubles as a license plate frame, there’s an optical flash trigger that detects the flash of the traffic-light camera. That trigger sets off one or both xenon flashes in the sides of the noPhoto, so when the traffic-light camera opens its shutter, there’s too much light and the picture of your license plate is overexposed. Big Brother can’t read your plate.
Originally posted by deadeyedick
I think it will be hard to get this idea operational.
Were talking milliseconds to counter a pic being taken.
It is pretty much instant once a flash goes off until the pic is taken
It would work if the plate holder was tied into your gps that has know camera locations in it.
Then send a signal to a series of 3 counter flash bulbs in the plate holder that can rotate flashes to create a solid 2 or 3 second flash.
Jonathan Dandrow has developed noPhoto, which renders the pix snapped by those revenue-generating robo-cams useless. The technology behind noPhoto is fairly simple. At the top of the gadget, which doubles as a license plate frame, there’s an optical flash trigger that detects the flash of the traffic-light camera. That trigger sets off one or both xenon flashes in the sides of the noPhoto, so when the traffic-light camera opens its shutter, there’s too much light and the picture of your license plate is overexposed. Big Brother can’t read your plate.