It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by renegadeloser
reply to post by spy66
The force acting on the mass in the vacuum, is the gravity from the mass of the earth around the vacuum. Just like in the picture.
If the tube were not there it would work like this. Each piece of the earth pulls directly towards it, with the net effect of all the pieces pulling directly down.
Maybe a thought experiment will help you.
Imagine a block with two ropes tied to it. One man is holding the rope, standing in front of the block and to the right. Another man is holding the other rope, and standing in front of the block and to the left. Now suppose both men pull the block directly towards themselves. Will not the block move directly forward, between the two men? The Block moves directly forward, despite the fact that there is no man standing directly in front of the block pulling it forward.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by PurpleChiten
NOW WHO IS RAISING THE WHITE FLAG!?
You state Gravity is a FORCE. You state that I am wrong and what is being discussed here is a simple question answered by Physics and Math yet you cannot PROVE what you state. Instead you DEFLECT by answering that to PROVE what you post would take a lengthy dissertation?
Sounds like a COP OUT! The REALITY is that it is you who have ignored Maxwell's statement. How unfortunate for you that you used it. Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Moduli
Although Gravity has been defined as the Weak Force...and you have provided a definition as to what constitutes a Force...Gravity is described as such because we simply do not have the proper vocabulary for it's TRUE DESCRIPTION.
You state that Gravity is a Force because a Force is described as anything that provides a Change in Momentum. Well then by all means...explain what Momentum is being changed as LIGHT or PHOTONS travel the Space/Time Curvature into a Black Hole?
Where is your CHANGE IN MOMENTUM? Split Infinity
Originally posted by renegadeloser
"Faraday did not have a background in sophisticated mathematics consequently he does not articulate his discovery through a complex equation. Faraday describes his discovery to us as a visual image of "Lines of force" which create "an Electro magnetic field" or "fields of gravity". "
source
This is from columbia university. It would appear that you are the one who is wrong.
This is why none of the other scientists during Faraday's time took him serious. It wasn't until after his death, that James Maxwell was able to describe his findings mathematically. Only then were they taken seriously by academia.
It's is important to note, however, that Faraday was right before Maxwell convinced the world. Not only that, but his experiments proved that he was right. Maxwell didn't make Faraday right, he just convinced Academia.edit on 31-10-2012 by renegadeloser because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by renegadeloser
this demonstrates that there is in fact gravity acting on the ball despite the vacuum. Gravity propagates through space regardless of the medium. Gravity acts on a straight line between to objects. Thus, the mass of the earth does not have to be directly under the ball to act on it.
The Black circle is the weight. The large green circle is the earth. The little black boxes each represents a little piece of the earth. Each red line is the line of force between each little piece, and the weight. You can think of the whole earth as being made up of little pieces, each pulling along a similar line. The net effect due to all of the lines will result in a downward force.edit on 31-10-2012 by renegadeloser because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by spy66
There has to be a physical force pulling the mass down. What is that force exactly?
Originally posted by spy66
... because that dosent tell me anthing.
Maybe you can tell me what exact force that is pulling the 10kg mass down.
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by renegadeloser
this demonstrates that there is in fact gravity acting on the ball despite the vacuum. Gravity propagates through space regardless of the medium. Gravity acts on a straight line between to objects. Thus, the mass of the earth does not have to be directly under the ball to act on it.
The Black circle is the weight. The large green circle is the earth. The little black boxes each represents a little piece of the earth. Each red line is the line of force between each little piece, and the weight. You can think of the whole earth as being made up of little pieces, each pulling along a similar line. The net effect due to all of the lines will result in a downward force.edit on 31-10-2012 by renegadeloser because: (no reason given)
Which is the sin of the angle. You don't have to have a degree in trigonometry to use trigonometry. Just as you unknowingly used trig (correctly) in your explanation, so did others who you claimed had no ability in math.... only the other guy knew it was trig and even wrote it as such.
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Maybe you can tell me what exact force that is pulling the 10kg mass down.
It can not be the 10kg mass in it self. As you say its just a mass. There has to be a physical force pulling the mass down. What is that force exactly? Dont say gravity because that dosent tell me anthing.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by renegadeloser
reply to post by PurpleChiten
"Because he was self trained, however, he had no grasp of mathematics and could therefore not understand a word of Ampère's papers."
wolfram
You saying that he had no formal backround in math, but could still do it, is good and all. Except that it simply is not true. That Faraday had little ability in math is a well documented, and well known, fact of science history. You want to ignore the fact, because in your world view a man can't be good at science, or as a thinker, unless he has a grasp of mathematics. You're blinded by your bias.
Go read a biography or ask an expert in science history. That Faraday had little ability in math is a fact.
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Maybe you can tell me what exact force that is pulling the 10kg mass down.
It can not be the 10kg mass in it self. As you say its just a mass. There has to be a physical force pulling the mass down. What is that force exactly? Dont say gravity because that dosent tell me anthing.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
You may not like it, but it's gravity
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by spy66
Maybe you can tell me what exact force that is pulling the 10kg mass down.
Gravity. Remove the vacuum tunnel from the equation for a moment. Place the mass on the ground. Where does the mass go? It's not flying away just because the vacuum tunnel is gone, right? It stays on the ground, why? What is keeping it on the ground? If you think it's something other than gravity say so now. If you agree it's gravity holding it down then add the vacuum tunnel now. The same gravity is still there but the ground has been replaced by the vacuum tunnel enabling the mass to fall. This doesn't change the gravity pulling the mass down, you've only removed the earth that was supporting the mass. Are you with me so far?
Originally posted by spy66
What gravity force exactly is pooling the mass down to the other end?
Gravity can be a lot of things. And there is not a lot that can pull on the 10kg mass.
Well if we remove the vacuum tunnel. It is the atmosphere that keeps the 10kg to the ground. The atmosphere that keeps the 10kg mass down comes from particles/gasses produced from earths solids,water and plants. Earths mass in it self doesn't keep the 10kg mass on the ground.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by spy66
Well if we remove the vacuum tunnel. It is the atmosphere that keeps the 10kg to the ground. The atmosphere that keeps the 10kg mass down comes from particles/gasses produced from earths solids,water and plants. Earths mass in it self doesn't keep the 10kg mass on the ground.
Would this hold true if the Earth were no longer flat but say, spherical?
ETA: I believe we have the crux of OP's problem here. (To state the obvious.)edit on 31-10-2012 by DenyObfuscation because: (no reason given)